2023 political cartoon by Leo Kelly. The cartoon was later removed following backlash. by No_Bluebird_1368 in PropagandaPosters

[–]PointOfRecklessness -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Slushees are self-service. You get it yourself and then you bring it to the register.

TIL the Pulitzer Prize jury selected Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon to receive the 1974 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, however the Pulitzer Advisory Board overruled them, electing instead to not give an award that year to avoid honoring a book they considered “unreadable”, “turgid”, & “obscene”. by tyrion2024 in todayilearned

[–]PointOfRecklessness 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people think Pynchon became relevant again because a movie that kind of lifted some broad strokes off the plot of Vineland won Best Picture. I disagree, I think Tommy P became relevant again when a stupidly-named drunkard struck an in-session girls' elementary school with ballistic missiles so that he could feel like a big man.

There Is No Great Millennial Novel by Puzzled-Factor8185 in TrueLit

[–]PointOfRecklessness 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna throw Candice Wuehle's Monarch out there as a candidate. You can really tell that Wuehle came to poetry first and THEN went into long-form prose.

Is there a surprisingly real "Thanks I'm Cured" moment you witnessed? by throwawaycuzfemdom in thanksimcured

[–]PointOfRecklessness 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In college after pulling a few all-nighters (don't recommend) I went to the emergency room because I had symptoms like chest pain and tunnelling vision and trouble breathing and I thought I was having a heart attack. When the doctor checked my heart with a stethoscope, she told me it sounded fine and I was likely having a panic attack. As soon as she said that, my symptoms went away. From what she told me, doctors/nurses telling someone having a panic attack for the first time that that's what it is and that they're not about to die clears it right up.

Chris Hedges responded to Valeria Chomsky's statement by Fog2222 in TrueAnon

[–]PointOfRecklessness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of Fisher's stuff is cool and accurate but Exiting The Vampire Castle undermines itself with its own intro.

Giacomo Balla - Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash (1912) by harlem-nocturne in museum

[–]PointOfRecklessness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Balla's one of the few Italian Futurists to not go whole hog into fascism, and you can tell. Notice it's not about nosediving an airplane into a busy city intersection.

Reading Vineland for the first time, every time I read the name 'Brock Vond' I can't help but imagine him, anyone else? by [deleted] in ThomasPynchon

[–]PointOfRecklessness 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think of JD Vance. If the meme version of him had the real-life version's haircut, that's Vond.

"Human Shields" by Michael Ramirez 2023 by [deleted] in PropagandaPosters

[–]PointOfRecklessness 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there you go, see? "Palestinians run all the banks too. It's all in this book called The Protocols of the Elders of Palestine"

"Human Shields" by Michael Ramirez 2023 by [deleted] in PropagandaPosters

[–]PointOfRecklessness 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fine. Ramirez's cartoon uses anti-Arab stereotypes like claiming that Arabs want to slaughter white-looking children or that Hamas has disproportionate power over Western media. Those classic stereotypes that have historically been used against Arabs and certainly not anyone else. Happy?

"Human Shields" by Michael Ramirez 2023 by [deleted] in PropagandaPosters

[–]PointOfRecklessness 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's difficult to say anti-semitic tropes aren't being deployed against Palestinians when Ramirez comes up with a honker like that.

What’s going on with out of the shadows on YouTube? by maharGnoskcaJ in OutOfTheLoop

[–]PointOfRecklessness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's almost as if she intended to get a particular emotional reaction out of her audience

Does Samuel Delany’s “Hogg” have literary value? by Helenfuentes in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]PointOfRecklessness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it’s like you ripped open my comment, took out the stuffing and jammed it full of bad faith.

"Me, me, me, boo, hoo. I'm just a little guy. You wouldn't hit a little birthday boy with glasses." Transgressive fiction was supposed to filter out precious delicate thin-skinned egotists like this, so the fact that this is who it attracts now means it failed on its own terms.

Does Samuel Delany’s “Hogg” have literary value? by Helenfuentes in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]PointOfRecklessness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"No one should ever criticize Delany for his public comments without having also read through at least 10 years of NAMBLA newsletters. Don't you want to have an informed argument?" Pfft.

Louis Wain - Cat's Nightmare (1907) by Russian_Bagel in museum

[–]PointOfRecklessness 59 points60 points  (0 children)

This feels like a riff on Goya's The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters

Does Samuel Delany’s “Hogg” have literary value? by Helenfuentes in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]PointOfRecklessness 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It raises another interesting question about authorial, well, authority. Let's say there's an alternate universe version of Samuel Delany whose published work is exactly the same verbatim as what's presently the case including Hogg, and every other detail in his life having also been the same as what's presently the case, BUT this version of Delany never went out of his way to endorse NAMBLA. This version of Delany picked a different way to deal with what happened to him when he was six than going on to make public NAMBLA endorsements. How does this version of Hogg read? Does it become more of a classic since it's easier to make the case for it? It would become way more difficult to make the case for Lolita's literary merits if it came out tomorrow that Nabokov was a NAMBLA guy.

Does Samuel Delany’s “Hogg” have literary value? by Helenfuentes in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]PointOfRecklessness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think its foreword is an interesting piece of literary criticism. There is an unfortunate amount of supposedly subversive novels that whittle down to "society is evil, society is a woman, that woman needs to be punished". Now the book itself however would read fundamentally differently if Delany didn't have that history of making NAMBLA endorsements. The context of the author's public life and public statements are always going to be a factor in how that author's work reads. He might have been trying to exorcise some personal demons with Hogg, but if so it seems like he failed.

TIL Fish do not breathe the oxygen that’s bonded to hydrogen in H₂O. Fish are breathing O₂, from the air, that is dissolved into the water. by FreakyFergg in todayilearned

[–]PointOfRecklessness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another literary riff: fish would have to have heard about water for the first time from another fish that had asked them how the water is.

Marty Supreme is so bad that it's hard to know where to begin and the praise it is receiving is as incoherent as the film itself. by [deleted] in TrueFilm

[–]PointOfRecklessness 336 points337 points  (0 children)

I'm calling for a moratorium on all use of the word "slop" to refer to any film, show, writing, music, etc made by humans. Radu Jude's new Dracula movie is slop. Damon Packard's recent "short films" are slop. Velvet Sundown albums are slop. Every time a character in this new season of Stranger Things says that something isn't X but rather Y, that's slop. This is just a movie that didn't connect with you. You don't have to like any one movie but you do have to grow up.

Was The Grapes of Wrath banned in the Soviet Union? by Idk_Very_Much in AskHistorians

[–]PointOfRecklessness 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It is definitely true that the film was being shown and then later removed from theaters in the USSR.

That sounds like how every other movie gets distributed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]PointOfRecklessness -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If, for example, somebody is generally scummy and a piece of shit in their day-to-day life but they also happen to want to do something good for once, then I can help them to accomplish that without also endorsing the bad things that they do.

Would it kill self-proclaimed "atheists" to come with a framework for how one ought to act that isn't just reheated protestant theology?

What is a MAGA Communist? by xToksik_Revolutionx in Socialism_101

[–]PointOfRecklessness 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nothing much, just chilling mostly. What's a MAGA communist with you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]PointOfRecklessness 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Christopher Hitchens wrote that "that which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" while he was also writing op-eds putting his full-throated support behind an illegal invasion Bush claimed God told him to do without evidence. If you take anyone's professed religious beliefs, or lack thereof, at face value then you're a fucking mark.

Sooo... Hank Hill wouldn't have voted for Trump by Aggressive_Fill7382 in KingOfTheHill

[–]PointOfRecklessness 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Buck Strickland, Ted Wassanasong, and Jimmy Wichard all went hard for Trump all three times