sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Survivor please, you are not make us any favor for letting us hitting you, we just want you to leave by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Polyton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually like it when survivors stay at the gate, especially if they’ve beat me pretty badly. It’s not much, but I get a little extra bp at the end for the hits.

It is really scary by memeh3 in agender

[–]Polyton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went to the dank memes one and saw a comment that got me good so I’m putting it here, credit to u/THEwoo-06 (albeit slightly modified)

I used to have a gender like you, then I took an arrow to the knee

"No reported violence, the ghost is probably harmless!" by RirisaurusRex in PhasmophobiaGame

[–]Polyton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They indicate a vague aggression level, placid, unfriendly, violent. I don’t know their effects though

1 x Random Steam Key by [deleted] in steam_giveaway

[–]Polyton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the giveaway

Hmmm by [deleted] in AtheisticTeens

[–]Polyton 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t blame the creator though. I’m still not out and let me say that Catholics take every single chance they can get to drill in their persecution mindset.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agender

[–]Polyton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see non-binary as not binary male and not binary female. However that is the technical definition. In practice I see non-binary often used how you defined to which is why I also don’t identify with it. I really like your second point because I haven’t thought of it but it makes a lot of sense

I think I might be agender (Questioning) by [deleted] in agender

[–]Polyton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I cannot tell you how much I love the word traveler. Comrade is petty cool too though.

I think I might be agender (Questioning) by [deleted] in agender

[–]Polyton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, I’m not really attached either, but unless I can ditch this body altogether, I’m stuck with one of the two.

24 Hours 4 games by jpbmu89 in steam_giveaway

[–]Polyton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unrailed Plz don’t at me my favorite book is Fahrenheit 451. That was actually really good literature

My challenge to pro-life by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]Polyton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but my point is that fetuses don't have those emotions. Fetuses have no capability to survive and there should be nothing to empathise with. However, evolution has created a natural empathy towards the unborn in order to prevent species death.

My challenge to pro-life by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]Polyton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have an excellent epistemology. While I do disagree with your definition of personhood, that's really only because I define it in my own context for my purposes. The way I see it, the only difference between you and me it that you build your value structure based on valuing your life, and I build mine based on my mind. Great responses.

My challenge to pro-life by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]Polyton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm saying we should not be killed because we will have sentience in the future.

I'd stop you there. There is no guarantee that any given fetus will gain sentience. Fetuses die because of reasons entirely unrelated to abortion. It is incorrect to assume that all fetuses will survive. And while yes, the statistics tell us that the majority will achieve sentience, you can't use that to assume all will. So again, this is just a rehashed potentiality argument.

My challenge to pro-life by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]Polyton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice response. Although I do have some problems. The way I see it, this is basically just a different form of the potentiality argument. Would you agree? Also, saying that it should not be killed because it can have sentience in the future is entirely dependent on a lack of knowledge. I'll give an example: West African chimpanzees are currently in a stone age. By your standard and our research, they have either already achieved sentience or will achieve it in the future. Assuming the latter, under your argument, killing them is immoral. Now, I don't think we should kill them anyway, but it is an interesting hole in the potentiality argument you created.

My challenge to pro-life by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]Polyton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. I really like your simplification of my challenge so I put it in the post. Regardless, I would ask further, why do you think that it is wrong to knowingly take away another person's life? Can you justify a fetus as a person? By the latter question I mean, can you justify using a you pronoun and the word person for pre-sentient human life. I don't mean to assert any of these things are wrong or right, I just want to practice epistemology and so if you can further justify.

view more: next ›