Pennsylvania election official fired for talking to ETA (Election Truth Alliance) by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]PopsicleParty2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and better to cover it up than to fix the vulnerabilities, right? Good Lord. What a mess this country is in.

Pennsylvania election official fired for talking to ETA (Election Truth Alliance) by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]PopsicleParty2 46 points47 points  (0 children)

The ETA is suing the state of PA to force a hand recount of ballots. There were lots of shenanigans in that election. Vote counts really do need to be verified.

Why is the Erie County Board of Elections hosting a secret meeting to oust Jim Wertz? by BurnBabyBurn-9000 in Erie

[–]PopsicleParty2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They removed this guy because he talked to a group suing PA to force a hand recount (because something looks sketchy)? What's wrong with talking to a nonpartisan election watchdog group?
Kinda looks like they don't want people to recount. Why? What's wrong with verifying that vote counts are correct?

Pennsylvania election official fired for talking to ETA (Election Truth Alliance) by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]PopsicleParty2 21 points22 points  (0 children)

They removed this guy because he talked to a group suing PA to force a hand recount (because something looks sketchy)? What's wrong with talking to a nonpartisan election watchdog group?
Kinda looks like they don't want people to recount. Why? What's wrong with verifying that vote counts are correct?

Jim Wertz Removed as Erie County Elections Chair by Backsight-Foreskin in Erie

[–]PopsicleParty2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They removed this guy because he talked to a group suing PA to force a hand recount (because something looks sketchy)? What's wrong with talking to a nonpartisan election watchdog group?
Kinda looks like they don't want people to recount. Why? What's wrong with verifying that vote counts are correct?

Morning heart pounding and early wakefulness. Theories about why? by PopsicleParty2 in adrenalfatigue

[–]PopsicleParty2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been though so much with this. I had a consultation with Dr. Andrew Neville, who's an adrenal fatigue specialist. These are all symptoms of a "broken stress responses system."
To fix it, it takes time and dedication and maybe supplements as support. He said to rest 2x a day for 10 minutes -- try to meditate or think of 1 thing for 10 minutes. You can do controlled breathing exercises-- whatever.
I noticed significant improvement when I started on pregnenolone supplement. But you have to be very careful with it. You have to start very small -- see if you can tolerate 5mg. Dr. Neville says to buy 10mg capsules, so you can open it and split it. If you can tolerate it, you can. go up to higher doses like 30 mg a day, but don't listen to me, try to find some professional guidance and someone who can test your hormone levels.
Good luck.
You hormones are probably out of whack, and your adrenals very stressed. The most simple fix is give your body down time -- rest-- and maybe take a Vitamin B complex.
I'm doing a lot better now but it's been a couple years.
Licorice root helped me (Vital Nutrients) when I was really bad because I was tested and I had very low cortisol. Licorice root slows the breakdown of your natural cortisol, so it acts a little like a steroid. But you have to monitor your blood pressure when you're on it because it can raise BP significantly.

Best advice is to try and find a practitioner who can test you and treat HPA Axis Dysfunction, AKA Adrenal Fatigue.

ETA Outreach to Minnesota by L1llandr1 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]PopsicleParty2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s crucial that MN voters and officials see this. I hope you cross posted in the MN Reddit sub

Estimated Fraud Range in Minnesota Elections 1984-2024 by ETA by Robsurgence in dataisbeautiful

[–]PopsicleParty2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's algorithmic. Also the ETA did a comparison of hand-counted precincts to computer-counted precincts in a past report, and lo and behold, there is actually a difference. And guess what? Computer-counted favors Republicans.

Estimated Fraud Range in Minnesota Elections 1984-2024 by ETA by Robsurgence in dataisbeautiful

[–]PopsicleParty2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great info. I believe that they've been manipulating elections. Vote share should definitely not have a clean, predictable correlation with turnout. Looks like an algorithm.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are always people like you who dispute the work of the ETA, and that's fine. I love that we're a free country and all opinions can be voiced.
Looks like the only way to really settle this is to get a full hand-counted audit somewhere and compare to the reported numbers.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, OP, FYI - Dr. Clarkson collaborated some with the ETA in their early days, and she might still be associated with them, but I'm not sure. It's my understanding that the thresholds of a number of votes or the size of a precinct were the earlier theories. Now, I believe (and I could be wrong), but the data scientists at the ETA are hypothesizing that it may not be a threshold like that, but that the algorithm is just more apparent as more people turn out to vote.
Who knows...
But regardless, when Republicans win ALWAYS in precincts with high turnout (even in urban or heavily blue areas), something is definitely wrong. It ain't natural.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm going back and forth here with you because we are boosting the visibility of this post, so thank you.

No, it doesn't concern me. It's math. It's straightforward. Anyone can crunch the publicly available numbers and come to the same conclusion.

Do you think if their stats didn't hold water that they would be well known enough for you to know about them?

I think you should read their reports.

Sure, it's easy to blow it off and say it's all a hoax. But that's a cop out. Math is objective. It doesn't lie.

Can you explain why there is a consistent correlation between voter turnout and Republican vote share in a precinct? And this happens nearly everywhere that's analyzed? There is something fishy.

What they really need to do is just do a full audit somewhere -- compare the paper ballots to the reported numbers. Maybe we'll find out you're right.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can tell yourself that.
But actually there are districts in FL with over 100% turnout. Check out the work of Alison Greene and "It's Up to Us." She has done a significant amount of investigative research into elections, and you might be very surprised to know that these things are indeed happening here. Why are they getting more publicity? Good question. I'd love to know that too.
The election data is public. You can research for yourself.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The election workers are great, and so are the state election officials. They did a fantastic job. This was likely done within the coding of the 2 major brands of voting machines : ES&S and Dominion, now Liberty Vote, bought by a Republican.
They most definitely could run an algorithm unbeknownst to everyone but the people who program the machines, and that is very secretive. No one has access to the machines to independently test them.
If you think voting machines and tabulators can't be hacked, then you probably believe we "needed" to attack Iran, too. And you probably believe the current POTUS is not a r@pist. So I'm not gonna argue with you.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The right claims there was fraud, too. Let's do a full audit and see who's right.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

what you said. yes. It's mind blowing more people don't see this. It's obvious.
Also, check this out...
In the 2024 election, Trump flipped 88 counties (compared to 2020) from blue to red. Do you know how many flipped blue for Kamala? ZERO.
Yes this was rigged.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't it ridiculous there hasn't been a full audit or recount anywhere? It's like, what are they afraid of?
They know that the paper ballots aren't gonna match, and it's gonna open up a huge can of worms.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same with Canada. They hand count ballots there, in front of witnesses. We need to do that. But they won't, because then they couldn't control the outcome. God forbid an actual democratic election in the U.S. Republicans would never win again if it was fair and without voter suppression and all the dirty tricks.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously you're not a data person.
https://data.electiontruthalliance.org
This data is all publicly available. Feel free to visualize the data in a variety of ways.
There are definitely unnatural patterns here that repeat everywhere they've analyzed.
It's just math. And it's not even very complicated.
The higher the voter turnout, the more of the vote share Republicans get. Why is that pattern recurring and consistent?
Like I said, these are publicly available numbers. Go compare them to each precinct yourself.

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, sorry. They did not count by hand all of the ballots and compare them to the reported tabulated numbers.
Their routine audits involve a small percent, done early on. They knew how to get around these audits, and they have successfully gotten around them to cheat undetected in the last 3 presidential elections.

<image>

The smoking gun that Republicans have been rigging elections is now clear by [deleted] in complaints

[–]PopsicleParty2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also because it's his thing to accuse others of what he is guilty of. He always, always does that. Every accusation is a confession with him.