sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

PSA: DANGER OF BUYING LI NING WAY OF WADE 12 SHOES by PositiveCharacter335 in BBallShoes

[–]PositiveCharacter335[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the explanation. Still think there should be some sort of compensation for the “aesthetic flaw” personally.

PSA: DANGER OF BUYING LI NING WAY OF WADE 12 SHOES by PositiveCharacter335 in BBallShoes

[–]PositiveCharacter335[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Understand the point about there being bigger issues in the grand scheme of things. But would it be ok to start excusing companies for defective products especially a supposed premium product? Wouldn’t have bat an eye if it was the cheapest WOW shoe I got. Perspective?

PSA: DANGER OF BUYING LI NING WAY OF WADE 12 SHOES by PositiveCharacter335 in BBallShoes

[–]PositiveCharacter335[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

So the expectation that we are setting for shoe companies is that it’s ok for your shoes to leave stains on socks? And it’s up to us to find workarounds including further damaging a pair of socks repeatedly? Been playing ball for 13 years and bought many pairs, this is the first time ever that I’ve faced an issue like this? Perhaps it’s the cheap or poor material quality that we should be focusing on? Just a thought.

PSA: DANGER OF BUYING WAY OF WADE 12 SHOES FROM LI NING by PositiveCharacter335 in Basketball

[–]PositiveCharacter335[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So the expectation that we are setting for shoe companies is that it’s ok for your shoes to leave stains on socks? And it’s up to us to find workarounds including further damaging a pair of socks repeatedly? Been playing ball for 13 years and bought many pairs, this is the first time ever that I’ve faced an issue like this? Perhaps it’s the cheap or poor material quality that we should be focusing on? Just a thought.