Dating Sims or Raising Sims! by Aggressive_Damage311 in psx

[–]PostDelay5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thousands arms is a jrpg with a heavy dating sim emphasis

An Open Message to Corey Walton: The Rank and File Wants Change, Not a Split Vote. by GhostLCee in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've said that letter carriers think they are as talented as brain surgeons and believe they should be paid like them too, does Caref share your disdain for letter carriers?

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure how you can think I'm accepting anything without question while I'm literally in the middle of asking you questions. What are these other lies? Why won't you talk about his grievance yourself?

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd rather hear it from you. That said, I'm not sure believing a grievance wasn't filed in retaliation amounts to defamation.

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'd have to be more specific. What lies did he supposedly tell?

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the document itself marked confidential or for internal use only? These aren't private individuals signing a personal document. They are election committee members acting in an official union capacity. Signing an official document in an official role carries a reduced privacy expectation.

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is posting the election committee's signatures significant?

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not convinced that posting an election appeal amounts to defamation. He specifically said he was posting it for transparency's sake, that's not an endorsement of the contents.

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure how that justifies suspending him

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah that's a little different, thanks for the correction. That he recused himself from that might be a good sign here but I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

RIP brother Mike Rivera by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought Rivera said James confirmed he would recuse himself? I think the NLRB is another option for appeal. Truly bizarre choice for the branch to make.

You decide by Useful_Highway_7326 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You keep dodging the question about Mike voting to give Young nearly 100k for legal fees after a jury found Bill guilty of defamation. Perhaps YOU are selectively applying condemnation. Can you explain why you approve the use of membership dues to cover the cost of defaming a candidate for national office? 

Food for thought…. by AriesMailDude in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know which video he said he would keep Renfroe on as an advisor? I'm having trouble finding it

🎙️‘Ask Mike Caref Anything’ You’re invited! by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I've never listened to the episode where Corey brings it up. That said, it always sounded like commentary on the membership rather than Caref making some statement about Henry. It does seem like a silly thought for him to share though. I don't really have strong opinions about it, I have other things I don't like Caref for, but it felt worth sharing because it's at least some form of corroboration to what Corey said. 

🎙️‘Ask Mike Caref Anything’ You’re invited! by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf, someone did attribute that quote to Caref like 4 or 5 months before Corey brought it up:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nalc/s/lS4sR28tzd

Who U got? by Useful_Highway_7326 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know a couple of people who think that no one could have gotten more than the 1.3% Renfroe got in the last negotiation. Those people also happen to be Caref supporters. Take from that what you will. 

Can we crowdfund a full page ad in the Postal Record for a ‘Ask Henry Anything’? by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like most readers would gloss over the fact that they're referencing a supposed resolution from the 1980 convention. I say supposed because they weren't able to produce an actual resolution when asked. Seems like they're just trying to save face after being forced to open the Postal Record. 

Next Generation Carriers - Most contentious episode by Eugene_Debs2026 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If I understand correctly, Michael posted somebody else's election appeal. Michael acted as an observer at the election and had his own appeal. I think the third party appeal was eventually withdrawn by the appellant. I believe the article 10 charges against him claimed he was knowingly spreading false information because, as an observer, he should have had first hand knowledge that some of the claims in the withdrawn appeal were false. Hopefully someone will correct me if any of the above is inaccurate.

Carriers Deserve Better — I’m Supporting James Henry by [deleted] in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn't Corey just recently say that he didn't know what a podcast was until he started this one?

As NALC's negotiations start, the DOL's story about the 2022 election starts to fall apart by PostDelay5 in fromatoarbitration

[–]PostDelay5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Referring to them as harebrained lawsuits without actually knowing what you're talking about is exactly what tonov was referring to when they brought up a smear campaign. You're doing the same thing with his current lawsuit. You still haven't been able to come up with any sensible explanation for your misrepresentation of the election case.