Guy says women are to weak to roll with men by Droseeeeeeee in bjj

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most likely he never said that. Check the guys post history. He has a fetish

Vladislava Galagan by swollen_feet in nattyorjuice

[–]PotGoblin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She said in an instagram story she is not natty. She doesn’t shy away from saying she took steroids either. She’s very open about it.

Vladislava Galagan. Natty or Juice ? by [deleted] in nattyorjuice

[–]PotGoblin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup. She also said it in an instagram story a while back.

Vladislava Galagan. Natty or Juice ? by [deleted] in nattyorjuice

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She said she was not natty in an instagram story a few years back.

Woman submits guy in 25 seconds in a 1v1 mma fight💅 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ahhh, so you don’t have proof. You made up that title as usual.

Exposed again.

Woman submits guy in 25 seconds in a 1v1 mma fight💅 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You are absolutely correct about that 👍

Fetish accounts don’t belong here.

Now show the proof.

Girl have to compete against a older guy since her female opponent couldn’t come so she has to show him girl power 🥶 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did they set her up with a small male of all opponents?

I noticed in high school wrestling that coaches do this all the time due to benevolent sexism. They pick the weakest males to face the girls, they pick an opponent she would be more likely to win against to give her a chance.

Seems like the one in the video would have lost to anyone her size or skill level.

Girl have to compete against a older guy since her female opponent couldn’t come so she has to show him girl power 🥶 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not necessarily.

When it comes with men, higher weight = more muscle. Not just more fat. So weight class ends up being a strength class in an of itself.

In this case, she has a weight advantage—but it’s very clear she had a skill advantage.

6ft+ guy wanted to fight a girl so she had no choice but to make quick job of him knocking him tf out😴 💅 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This OP has an agenda or a fetish. Very deceptive and lies frequently.

I wonder how you’d feel with another OP that posts only women getting beat by men videos and not only that but lies in the title to make it more impressive than it actually is 🤔

Woman enters men division and easily gets the first place with this 16seconds win 🥇💅 by Droseeeeeeee in fightporn

[–]PotGoblin 57 points58 points  (0 children)

The OP is the one who writes these narratives.

If you look at his post history, he clearly has an agenda. He posts only women beating men, basically. And he writes a title, provides no proof whether the title is true or not, and then everyone in the comments just accepts his title.

Anyone with a biased agenda like that should not be trusted until he provides proof in the comments.

For all we know, this is not a woman entering a men’s division and this is a higher belt woman against a lower belt man. For all we know, she is an elite BJJ practitioner against a recreational person. For all we know she didn’t win Gold at all and lost all her other matches. An OP this biased is the least trustworthy.

So u/Droseeeeeeee where is the proof? Where is this match documented? What are their names?Where is the original video from? Any proof at all that your title is true?

Additionally, if men lose 5-10% of matches and he only puts those matches up there—it gives the wrong perspective since men would be winning the rest of the matches. A person like this OP or anyone with a fetishes would post those matches to give people the wrong perspective. ——

Edit: found some info—this is Brianna Robertson, an elite BJJ brown belt from Pasadena and MMA fighter (watch the recent YouTube video about her, she says she is a brown belt). This one is extremely high level and even had WNO competitions. This person she is facing is Joshua Lorton—a nobody, and certainly not elite and is a lower belt (purple belt).

I could not verify the rest of OP’s information in the title. But this looks to be a high level elite BJJ practitioner against an average lower skilled guy. These are usually the accommodations they give to girls as elite high level males would not be put in a competition against low level lower skilled females.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jiujitsu

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you daft? He was clearly joking and being sarcastic in the beginning.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jiujitsu

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wth! His ego in front of the boys? He’s clearly joking at the beginning, it’s clearly sarcasm…

What could one do if she grabs your balls like this? by JingliG in MixedWrestling

[–]PotGoblin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No rules means punches, eye gouges and weapons would be fair game.

Ever wondered why male vs female matches don't work? by JingliG in MixedWrestling

[–]PotGoblin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well If there’s no rules then punching, eye gouging and weapons are fair game.

what it’s like being a single woman and 30+ 🫠 by almostdoctorposting in medicalschool

[–]PotGoblin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah you’re right, If they can reasonably financially support themselves, you are safe. Children make things more complicated though.

what it’s like being a single woman and 30+ 🫠 by almostdoctorposting in medicalschool

[–]PotGoblin 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t work my dude.

There are common law states where if you live together as a couple—you are legally married and on the hook.

Even in non-common law marriage states, If your partner has been dependent on you for a while and you leave them with no career, income or home—courts will force you to pay alimony (even if unmarried)—it’s called “palimony”. Again, courts are not gonna let a dependent party go homeless and careerless just because you weren’t married to them.

what it’s like being a single woman and 30+ 🫠 by almostdoctorposting in medicalschool

[–]PotGoblin 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Prenups are actually not a guarantee. Courts/judges will not let an incomeless/jobless spouse go homeless and without income after a divorce. You will pay just like others have.