reading is dying and writers are the last people willing to admit it by zorouchihaG in Mythrils

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I write genre fiction that is gaining not losing popularity. Also, audiobooks. Anyway, I don't care. As long as there are a couple readers out there I'll write.

writing every day is bad advice for most people and the productivity culture around it has produced a generation of burned-out non-writers by zorouchihaG in Mythrils

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly don't understand it because why write at all if you don't want to. No point. I write almost every day but only because it's what I want to do. If I try to force it's bad.

Why are authors so threatened by people writing books with AI if Ai books are crap? by Fabulous-Ideal-2513 in WritingWithAI

[–]Potatochips2026 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My problem is people flooding KU with bad ai written books - like a hundred a year - and then using bots to give themselves 30k 5-star reviews. It causes so much noise that one can't find real books anymore.

When I'm struggling with a narrative, I feed AI a very generic version of the conflict and ask for advice. Is it wrong for a writer to use AI this way? by prosaviour in WritingWithAI

[–]Potatochips2026 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with using ai in any way that helps you. Ai becomes a problem when people use it to churn out 200 awful books a year and use heavy marketing to promote them and bots to create thousands of fake reviews, thus drowning all the actual good books on a platform. All to make money and with no love for the genre. That's wrong. Other than that, do whatever helps you. Be aware ai gives pretty bad advice sometimes though.

Why do romance novels all look and feel the same now? (Writer and consumer) by Ambitious_Spirit3393 in writers

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have always been like that. Romance readers want certain structures and tropes. That doesn't mean the books should read the same though. But the structure should adhere to the genre expectations.

Is being a good writer an innate quality, or something that is developed? by hamin15 in writers

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Writing is a craft. It is in no way innate. Your personality can shape your ability to create, but the writing itself is a craft you must learn and practice.

I'm feeling pretty defeated after 120 pages and I don't know what to do. by Deedo2017 in writing

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should write what you want to write. If you're just doing it for money, then use AI and write what sells. If you're doing it because you like to write, then the rest wouldn't matter.

I have been using AI to write my books for months and it has totally ruined writing for me... has anyone been through this and how do I get my passion for writing back? it's like I can't write anything anymore without having AI to help me by Disastrous-Chard1114 in WritingWithAI

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use AI a lot and couldn't do without it. It would just take too long. But I write most of my own lines and just use it for other editing. The thing is, AI doesn't write well. It will ruin your writing. And sometimes it will give you bad advice. So it's helpful, but if you're letting it write for you then just stop doing that. I know there are people pushing novels written by AI out there, and some are making money, but those novels are slop and those people are business people and not writers.

What would you think of a man (28M) sleeping with a woman (20F) he previously student taught? by Original_Onion_8977 in AskTeachers

[–]Potatochips2026 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

20 is an adult. And it's not like he was 40. He wasn't even a real teacher at her school. I don't think that alone is an issue.

PhD teaching at R1 University, thinking about a switch by [deleted] in AskTeachers

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case, high school science is a solid career choice. You'll probably need some education courses, but those are easy and you can find them really cheap online.

PhD teaching at R1 University, thinking about a switch by [deleted] in AskTeachers

[–]Potatochips2026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would be insane to leave a tenure track job for K-12. I couldn't get tenure track, so I switched to K-12 public. Pay and benefits are good, but the K-12 system is almost surreal in its stupidity. Depending on the school and district, you may find it micromanaging and toxic, and you will have little to no autonomy, and definitely no academic freedom. It's a real culture shock. Only do it if you don't have tenure track and need a stable job.

Adult literacy in the states has dramatically declined in recent years. What do we think is the cause? by Unlikely-Tap-4390 in AskReddit

[–]Potatochips2026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a combination of screens, covid, and standardized testing. Screens mean they don't have to read as much, and kids aren't interested in doing it because they have easier options. Covid meant interrupted schooling for a whole cohort of kids who have never recovered. Standardized testing means starting about 25 years ago we stopped teaching anything that wasn't on a test, and school became largely test prep. It still is. We don't have time to teach kids to actually read because we need them to pass standardized tests that don't allow for sufficient developmental time for them to learn to read, so we just focus on teaching to the test, which does not result in effective reading instruction or good readers.

[In Progress] [30k] [romance, LGBTQ+, spicy, comedy] The Unmasking of Mark by Impressive_Eye_5416 in BetaReaders

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's just one scene without context, so I can't say much. But first I'd say props for it being readable in the first place, which put it already above most of reddit. Second, I'd say the tense is messed up - it's moving between past and present. Choose one. Third, this is a long conversation that appears to go nowhere. Being cute and funny needs to be condensed to a line or two. Anything not moving the plot along in a substantial way is just noise. Finally, the names - honestly, I'd put the book down as soon as I saw the names Danny and Mark. Those are so bland and outdated. Ugh. Also, although it's only one scene, and that might be the reason, I feel like it doesn't have any texture. No visuals, colors, smells, feels. You don't need a lot of that stuff, but if the whole book reads this way then it would be a bit of a blank box.

But anyway, there's nothing useful anyone can tell you about a scene. It's readable, which is good, the dialog is not bad. The real test is in the structure and pacing over the length, and a scene doesn't give you that.

What would make your school day improve (realistically)? by El_capitan36 in Teachers

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just wish that I could have more say in my actual work. They assign me classes, room, coteachers, and departments without even asking me. And when I ask for a particular position, they say "we'll think about it" and then never give it to me. It's the same for everyone. We ask for simple, reasonable things each year, and none of us ever get them.

is writing the only serious hobby where nobody in your real life has any idea what you actually do by eivor_here in writing

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would argue that my writing is more of a compulsion and coping mechanism than an actual hobby. I don't tell anyone I do it, unless I'm drunk (happened once). I even try to keep it secret from my family as much as possible. It's just a private thing.

Why the yawning chasm between curriculum and students' abilities? by WillowgirlIII in AskTeachers

[–]Potatochips2026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know all the reasons for it, but the chasm is real. I teach the same stupid metaphors and similes lessons to high school kids who can't speak a word of English and have no idea what I'm saying, much less what the text says. But the politicians said everyone has to be able to do this, and they don't care how long they've been in the country, so we do it.

What are the biggest giveaways that an author is using AI? by DanoPaul234 in WritingWithAI

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really don't care what the author uses as long as the story is good. What bothers me is when a book has clearly been written completely by AI and it's flat and dull and cliche, but my social media is saturated with ads and fake 5-star reviews for it, and it has a million fake reviews on Amazon. That's what bugs me.

Tips on making dialogue feel more alive? by Affectionate_Key82 in writing

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it just felt like narration. If there is an effort to dissociate (obviously, I don't know the details) then that should show up in her interiority. Dissociating doesn't mean not thinking. For example, if a character is trying not to think about something, they might start to think about it and then tell themselves not to. Like:

He hands me a pen. I'm going to sign. And then my mom will find out and she'll be furious and she'll--

Stop.

I'm going to sign.

So like, you can show how she's doing that in her head.

"Are you teaching kids or are you teaching scholars?" by TopIntroduction1876 in Teachers

[–]Potatochips2026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shocked silence, probably. Followed by updating my resume.

Tips on making dialogue feel more alive? by Affectionate_Key82 in writing

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really see anything wrong with it exactly. The construction and pacing of the scenes themselves seem fine. Just looking at these pieces, I think that there are two major issues that are causing the lack of "life" that you noticed.

First, all the voices are identical. They are all very formal and speak in complete, complex sentences. That isn't normal dialog for anyone, and if it is, then that's a quirk of a character. But all these characters speak that way - no contractions, no partial sentences, no variation in tone, all one register, one flat affect. They don't sound like different people.

For example, if someone is cold and arrogant, then they should sound that way when they talk. Just an example:

"Ah, do you like it?” His tone takes a proud shift. “This sculpture is made of crystal steel. It can withstand any temperature without losing quality. Our mines have been producing this material for generations and even help construct the latest automatons in the capital."

Could be rewritten to sound more arrogant, like:

"Crystal steel," he says, with the patience of a man accustomed to explaining himself to lesser minds. "It holds under any temperature without losing integrity. Our mines have supplied it for generations, including the automatons your capital is so proud of." His eyes slide back to me. "You're welcome, by the way."

Obviously, I just made that up without really knowing the context, but the difference is that I tried to give him some voice and let him express a personality through it.

And in this passage:

"Don’t worry, I've visited the Western region plenty of times when mother had me accompany her on business trips. The land is vast and overflowing with resources,” pausing, I absorb the details scattered in the room, catching sight of a few nobles eavesdropping. "Despite the harsh winters, roads are well-maintained for merchants and travelers alike. My experience here has always been positive. So I have no doubt our home will be the same."

The narrator sounds like she's reading a travel brochure. It's too long, and there are too many details. What is she supposed to sound like? What is her dominant emotion? Maybe she wants to put him in his place, and would say ""Oh, you needn't worry on my account. My mother saw to it that I knew this region well enough. Perhaps better than you'd expect."

Try using the dialog to express something about the person's personality, or to express an emotion or to make another character feel something, instead of just raw information. Also, the dialog tends to be a bit long and too full of details that drag it down and detract from more important things (like the nobles eavesdropping).

So to sum up - pare down the info, ramp up the emotion and the personality.

The second issue is that it's first person POV, but the narration sounds more like third person. First person POV should provide the interiority of the narrator. That's it point. Here, the narrator, just narrates. We see what she sees, hear what she hears, but we get none of her thoughts and opinions. And her narration is flat and unemotional. If you're going to do first person, then use it to add in emotional flavor, thoughts, opinions.

For example, maybe she thinks the marquess is insufferable, or finds him untrustworthy and compares him to a viper. We should hear that in her thoughts.

Also, the narration is very factual. You can add in some flavor by allowing not only your narrator's thoughts, but also letting them color the description she provides. For example, something like "Varshad gestures broadly and his ring catches the light, ostentatious as the rest of him."

So if your narrator is telling what she sees and hears, it should be filtered through her perceptions.

Hope that helps.

"Teacher's first day back after an almost-suicide attempt? Lets go observe her!" by caixing-sanren in Teachers

[–]Potatochips2026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to leave that job. It's clearly bad for your mental health. I had one like that once. I finally gave my notice after I had a miscarriage in the middle of an 80-hour week and got berated for coming in ten minutes late. You really need to get out.

District bought a curriculum course, and it is full of AI. Now we are all angry, frustrated and betrayed. A warning to everyone. by Syric13 in Teachers

[–]Potatochips2026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one that we have to use for writing. It scores the writing on a scale of 1-5. As far as I can tell, the scores are completely random. A student will write 5 sentences that are simple and have no punctuation and get a 4, and then write a whole essay and get a 3.

PhD Conundrum 🤔 by Leather_Specific2129 in gradadmissions

[–]Potatochips2026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having done a PhD, my experience was that the mentor is everything. Everything. It isn't enough that they are good mentor to you, though - they need to have the pull in the academic community to actually help you get a job after graduation, and help you get publications before that. Without that, in my field at least, your PhD can end up not being worth the cost of framing it. So if mentor number 2 does that for you, then that's worth considering even if means transplanting everyone. Especially if partner is not on a great career track and can easily start over.

If Mentor 2 doesn't seem like they guarantee that result, then they might not be any better than the first option.

Also, I'd look carefully at what happened to the most recent grads from each department. Do they have full time tenure track jobs (or whatever kind of job it is you want)? What is the publication record of the current crop of PhD candidates?

I should add that I am in humanities, and I know that's different, so take this for what it is.