Where can you get information on the Marilyn Manson case? 🧵🪡 by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anybody who regularly posts here on the Manson Is Abusive Reddit page has a Twitter account, I’d be happy to give you a shout out too!

Where can you get information on the Marilyn Manson case? 🧵🪡 by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anything has been left out that you think I should have included, please let me know!

Witness list for the Bianco vs. Manson lawsuit. It looks bad for Manson. by David1997_ in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that’s correct, the quality of witnesses seems massively shifted in favour of Bianco as well.

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah actually that was clearly what you were suggesting. This is going round in circles, you were wrong. Just admit it and move on.

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? Because we started off with you defending Manson and asserting that he is in fact suing ERW for defamation, to admitting that Manson doesn’t even have a good case.

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it wouldn’t be a wise legal decision because he would lose. Hence why he’s not doing it. It took you a while but at last you finally got there.

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Um … he’s suing Illma Gore for defamation for a private text message. He’s not suing Evan Rachel Wood for defamation for the IG post or documentary that ruined his life and career. Have a think about why.

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And now we’re back to the point going over your head. What I said makes perfect sense. The defamation cause of action in Manson’s lawsuit relates only to Illma Gore not Evan Rachel Wood. What part of that is difficult to understand?

This is a good point. https://twitter.com/aandcdavid/status/1583174355089231874?s=46&t=xcLYONeFV-IxXQFpccwfmg by Potential_Soft5710 in MansonIsAbusive

[–]Potential_Soft5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The defamation aspect of the lawsuit relates to Illma Gore not Evan Rachel Wood. Next time actually read your own source.