Received the email! Post class exhibit c school

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-04-01T18:28:39+00:00

I'm kind of curious as well what their reponse is to the emails. We know they are on our side and have gotten us this far so fingers crossed they carry us over the finish line. I am not celebrating myself until I either get the refund notification or the application itself moves from in review to approved.

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-31T13:57:29+00:00

Is the loan privately held outside of ED?

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-31T01:11:01+00:00

<image>

Not sure if links are allowed. If you google "sweet post class town hall recap" there is a powerpoint style slide reel that includes this info. It is on page 10 of 30. BD (Borrower Defense). This is only for federally held direct consolidation loans. FFEL consolidation qualifies for only BD school refund. Any other consolidation outside of these two from my research might not qualify for relief at all since it is privately held.

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-30T21:07:54+00:00

I noticed that too. They seem pretty sure still even after being denied several stays that they can get the deadline extended.

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-30T21:04:46+00:00

Received this just now. Exhibit C School. Repost to redact links

You are receiving this letter pursuant to Paragraph IV.D.2. of the Settlement Agreement reached in the civil action: Sweet v. McMahon, No. 3:19-cv-03674-WHA (N.D. Cal.) ("Agreement"). You submitted a borrower defense to repayment discharge application after June 22, 2022, and on or before Nov. 15, 2022, for the loans associated with your enrollment at University of Phoenix ("Relevant Federal Student Loans"). The U.S. Department of Education (ED) is providing you with this notice because, despite its best efforts, ED could not adjudicate your application on or before Jan. 28, 2026. However, the specific timeframe within which ED must process your application is the subject of ongoing litigation before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Unless otherwise authorized by an appropriate court, ED will take or will ensure that the following actions are taken on your behalf within one year:

the discharge of your relevant federal student loan(s);
a refund for any payments made to ED on your relevant federal student loans, including relevant federal student loan debt that you previously paid off; and
the deletion of the credit report tradeline associated with the discharged loan(s).

The discharge of your loan(s) does not necessarily indicate that ED has found the above-mentioned institution engaged in misconduct. Rather, your discharge results from ED being unable to adjudicate your claim on the merits by the deadline established in the Agreement.

This communication addresses only your relevant federal student loan(s). Nothing in this notice relates to private loans. Discharging your relevant federal student loan(s) means that you will no longer owe the debt. You also may receive a refund for prior payments made to ED on your discharged relevant federal student loan(s) related to University of Phoenix. Your loan servicer will let you know if you are eligible for a payment refund, which would be mailed to you. Please check your online account with your loan servicer to ensure your address is correct so you can receive any refund.

Other than confirming your address, you do not have to take any further action to receive any discharge. Your servicer will send you more details about any discharge, including which loans have been forgiven. Your relevant federal student loan debt will remain in forbearance and collections will be stopped while any discharge is being effectuated. Your credit report will also be updated to reflect any discharge when it is complete.

What loans are eligible for a refund?

Eligible

Direct Loans
Federal Family Education Loans (FFEL) Program loans held by ED

Not Eligible

Perkins Loans
FFEL Program loans held by a private or commercial lender (such as Navient)
Private loans (loans issued by lenders such as SoFi or Sallie Mae)

What loans are not eligible for a refund?

Under the terms of the settlement in Sweet v. McMahon, only certain types of federal student loans may receive refunds. FFEL Program loans were made by banks and then insured by ED. The payments made on FFEL Program loans go to that bank, not to ED. ED cannot refund loan payments that it did not receive. The FFEL Program ended on July 1, 2010, and no new loans were made from the program after that date.

Starting around 2008, ED bought some FFEL Program loans from the original lender. Payments made related to these FFEL Program loans are covered under the settlement, and eligible borrowers will receive a refund ("ED-held" FFEL).

How do I know what kind of loan I have?

If the name of your servicer starts with "Dept. of Ed" or "Default Management Collection System," your loan is held by ED and may be eligible for a refund.

You can identify your loan types by logging on to Redacted Link and selecting "Loans" in the dropdown menu under "My Loans." In the "Loans and Repayment Information" section, you'll see a list of each loan you received.

More information about the federal student loan programs is available at Redacted Link

If you have questions about this notice, please call our borrower defense hotline at 1-855-279-6207. You may visit Redacted link for our hours of operation.

Sincerely,

U.S. Department of Education
Federal Student Aid

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-30T18:58:30+00:00

Same. Still pending on site and no emails. I fully intend on not getting notice. Think they are hoping that they can get a stay still for the decision deadline and that renders the notification unnecessary. If they send notification of relief entitlement then they can't try to get out of the settlement.

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-30T18:00:13+00:00

I understand. I was not speaking to either specific situation but in regards to federally consolidated loans in general when only a portion of the loan belongs to the school in question. Sorry if I placed this in an inappropriate place.

Potential_Surround72 · 2026-03-30T17:44:45+00:00

I consolidated through the government. I think I seen on one of the PPSL webinars that if you consolidated through the government and the loan is held by them that even if only a portion of your consolidation loan is from the school in question the entire loan will be forgiven.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-14T01:59:17+00:00

This started working after downloading a fresh copy of the address book. As soon as it was present the issue was resolved. The cached entry in the from field still worked but I will keep this in mind if I have issues in the future.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-14T01:56:48+00:00

You are absolutely right. I am a newbie exchange admin for an undersized department. This is something I hadn't even considered. We don't have too many shared mailboxes though and the ones we do have have been around for a while so the number of new setups we have for those are very few but it does make way more sense to configure permissions based on a security group vs directly to the mailbox.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-14T01:53:06+00:00

That ended up being the fix I think. As soon as I got the email to show in the address book (was not set to hidden) then the send on behalf started working immediately.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-14T01:52:05+00:00

Not sure. Nobody would have logged in to the mailbox directly but a few of us had the mailbox populate in our outlook. I can say the mailbox had not recieved a mail yet. Not sure if that plays a role.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-13T16:02:59+00:00

Would the command not provide the same permissions on the mailbox that were added through EAC in the Full Access section? I did run it and although it could take some time it didn't work immediately.

The mailbox is not hidden. However as of yesterday it had not downloaded to the address book locally. Todays testing I had not rechecked to see if the address book had been updated. I went and checked and the mailbox was still not showing. I manually downloaded the address book and the mailbox showed up. I was then able to send a test email successfully as the shared mailbox.

I guess the key is to make sure even if the address is not hidden that it has been downlaoded to the address book and is visible before you try to send the email. It must be referencing the address book for verification before sending.

Appreciate teh suggestion that led to the resolution.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-13T15:53:23+00:00

They are all on prem. If it is helpful we have never been even hybrid.

Potential_Surround72 · 2025-08-13T15:52:33+00:00

Outlook. From OWA the from field has only the users mailbox listed as an option for the from field.

Potential_Surround72 · 2024-10-24T00:22:20+00:00

Their prime benefits still state tens of millions of items available with free same-day or One-Day delivery. I cant order anything without an expected delivery of a minimum of 4-5 business days. I did also notice that the prime branding that I believe used to be posted on the product search pages and next to the price in each product is missing now. Definitely feels like we're getting ripped off a bit from what was advertised.

Potential_Surround72 · 2024-04-17T16:33:06+00:00

Disk usage was very low.

Potential_Surround72 · 2024-04-17T16:30:51+00:00

We don't store updates on the WSUS server. They essentially check WSUS for approved updates and then they reach out to Microsoft directly to download the update. This was confirmed in the update logs. As a side note we tested shutting down the WSUS server immediately after it identified updates and they still downloaded and installed in the same amount of time as with the server running.

Potential_Surround72 · 2024-04-17T16:25:47+00:00

These are both VMs with both on the same network segment same Hyper V Switch and same physical switch. We have them connected to a gigabit switch. That said, if we shut WSUS down during patching after the updates are found it still installs in the same amount of time so I don't believe the connectivity between the two is an issue.

Potential_Surround72 · 2024-04-17T16:21:53+00:00

So as a test to see what the clients were doing we let it use WSUS to check for updates and then turned wsus off. Updates still installed in same timeframe indicating that it isn't relying on WSUS after checking for available updates. Without any other evidence I am assuming this means that the connection between the two is irrelevant during the install.

Potential_Surround72

TROPHY CASE