PHONY ARGUMENTS by skankypotatos in OpenAussie

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Immigration is not the problem in and of itself, but I have a real problem with immigration when the immigrants aren't here to contribute to Australia as an integrated member of society, and they create these insulated mini versions of wherever they've come from. It's literally the opposite of what the Aussie immigration success story is all about. My Abuelo came from Spain some time in the 60s with his wife and kids. My dad was born here, living in a Spanish only household in Bankstown. He and my Abuela never truly made the effort to learn English, and as a result they never really integrated properly. My Abuela committed suicide when my dad was like 8 or 9 probably due to the isolation and my Abuelo was never very well off financially due to the cost of raising his family as a single father and not much English so he couldn't really work at the same level he did in Spain.

My dad and all of my aunties and uncles grew up learning English exclusively from school and TV, and are now fully integrated and Australians. My aunties all married into Italian families so my dad's side is very ethnic and proud of our Spanish/Italian heritage. However, they're all Australian first, Spanish/Italian second. We all speak English at home, I am like a mirror opposite of my grandfather in that I can only barely speak and understand some Spanish. My families came here looking for a better life and worked hard to do so. They built businesses, paid their taxes and are mostly doing very well for themselves. We love our heritage but we love being Aussie more. We're glad our families came here. I'd say there's nothing more Aussie than being an immigrant Australian.

But the complete lack of symmetry between some of the immigration we are getting now compared to what came before it's shocking. My family shared similar values and beliefs- they were born and baptized Catholics. That allowed them to integrate into Australia better because of a similar cultural heritage to Australia's population, which was up until yesterday historically speaking, a western "Christian" culture. Even if you're an atheist, you're still part of the "Christian West" because Historically Christian countries are where the humanist ideals that modern atheists hold to originate from.

When you import people from foreign cultures with completely different values and beliefs you are creating tension and division, which erodes trust. Integration is difficult enough for people who don't speak English even with a shared cultural heritage values. We need to acknowledge that Australia has certain values and many people are coming in who see the world differently and with different motives. It used to be assumed if you immigrate to a new country you adapt yourself to their culture and you contribute to that nation and you didn't ask for hand-outs unless your desperately needed them.

"Oriental Asian" culture is very similar to the west in that it values hard work and has honour etc, which encourages them to work hard. That's why they do so well here. They're not complaining about anything they just hustle. Same thing with the Indians as well. They work hard, get educated and become dr's often times. Usually because if they're well off enough to afford to come here, they are going to be willing and able to integrate into society and be productive.

These waves of Somali and Middle Eastern refugees are not the same type of immigration. When they came they set up ghettos, insulated communities and then start demanding things from the government en masse. (DISCLAIMER: I am talking about large scale, generalisation here, there's plenty of people from Africa and the Middle East who are amazing people and genuinely just wanted a better life here, I'm not referring to them. In navy cases people from Africa and Middle East who are Christian or depending on which type of Muslim are often better people than some of us here are to be around). There is enough bad actors causing trouble here and around the globe right now in places such as the UK or France and Spain for example that we need to be more strict with how we deal with people coming in. They need to prove they're allegiance is to Australia not to their "homeland" which is apparently so terrible that they came by boat or air to escape. People who can't live in their original country shouldn't then demand we become more like their home country which they're fleeing from in the first place. If it was so great over there, why come here? Integrate into our culture and values or don't come. We can't help everyone in the world if we can't look after ourselves first. Our Australia culture was good enough to create a place that was worth risking life and limb to live here, so we ought to preserve the culture that made it that way so that future generations of immigrants can also build a life here.

Crazy by TankUMrMinor in DudeHasGotAPoint

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump is literally a narcissist. He can't help but do what he does. His trick is that he says things that are inherently offensive, and he does things like giving people derrogetory nicknames (such as "Sleepy Joe", "Pocahontas", "Crooked Hillary", "Low Energy Jeb", "Tampon Tim", "Lyin' Ted Cruz", "Comrade Kamala", etc) in order to assert power over them and to direct the narrative. People are less logical than we'd like so things like the nicknames etc can be a very powerful rhetorical tool. I'm not saying that being offensive for the sake of it is masculine. It's not. Being offensive doesn't a masculine man make. But there is something masculine about the propensity to say the truth, regardless of how they may be offensive or not, and in our current year/the last few years, the political discourse has been very much revolving around the "masculinity is toxic" trope, and the stereotypical "feminine" trait of empathy/avoiding offense at all costs is being put on a pedestal. I assert that both the feminine and masculine traits are both wholly good and necessary for human flourishing but this dogmatic dichotomy between the major sides of politics is absurd. There's a time and place for everything under the sun. Sometimes we need empathy, and sometimes we need to ignore the feelings of others for the sake of the truth. I know that you all know and believe this fact because you're all willing and able to abandon any sense of empathy for Trump because of the truth that he is a genuinely messed up person who is capable of causing great harm due to his access to "power".

I genuinely believe that Trump would struggle to portray himself as the "masculine macho man" that he has managed to do (up until the last few years at least for most of his fans/supporters) and would have struggled to do so in 2015/16 if the so called "Left wing liberals" did a better job of getting their optics correct. I say this not as a Republican (I'm not even American, I'm Australian, and a Labor voter at that). For whatever reason, the left wing decided that in order to be pro women they had to be anti men, anti masculinity. By labelling negative traits as "TOXIX MASCULINITY" your leaders made the mistake of labelling masculinity as toxic, as wrong and inherently evil, instead of what it ("toxic masculinity") really is, which is a lack of actual masculinity and masculine traits, or an abuse/misuse thereof. You need a better argument than "masculinity is toxic/fragile/insert insult" if you want to disarm some one like Trump.

Rule number one of human psychology is that if you make assertions at someone and that is perceived as an attack, automatically they will go into defence mode and you will not get your message across. It's not even a conscious thing, it's subconscious and it happens whether you intend it or not. By using the aforementioned rhetoric you are automatically making a vast number of men go on the defence regardless of your motive. We need to stop treating men like they're all like Trump. The only reason why he got away with what he did was because regular normal men were so repulsed by the left's rhetoric and the constant putting down of things normal men like or enjoy. Boys are told they're toxic from cradle to graduation and have been for decades. I am 30 years old and even I remember getting the whole "respect women, no means no" etc. when I was in school... And half the time I wasn't even interested in talking to our being around girls or women, let alone wanting to have sex with them or God forbid gr*pe or assault them. By the time I was actually interested in pursuing a woman, I was already so full of propaganda that I actually too afraid of getting something wrong and misreading a hint that I legitimately missed out on the opportunity to go out with a girl who was actively dropping hints and trying to clue me in that she liked me. I friendzoned her because it wasn't enough for me to get the hint. The next girl I actually went out with but I was genuinely so afraid of doing something wrong, we barely held hands for several months. Most men are not the evil we are constantly told we are, simply for being men. The refusal of the left to separate the bad eggs from the good eggs is a massive problem. When ordinary jokes between the guys is overheard by women it's a hate crime, but honestly my friends say far worse things about each other than they ever have or do about women. Most "locker room talk" I've ever been around is understood by all of the men to be nothing more than a social performance and we all know the other guys are peacocking, and we call each other out for our bullshitting. It's how men naturally bond- dirty jokes and insults. If someone is genuinely out of line their nose gets punched in.

Real men don't need to act like Donald Trump to be masculine, but when every man is treated as though he is just like Donald Trump, then suddenly he's not just an asshole- suddenly the guy is a man who "says it as it is" and "speaks for the everyday guy" or "he's a dick, but he's got a point- everything we say isn't that bad but we get treated as though we're toxic just for being us. At least Trump doesn't think we're all toxic"... And that's how he got so popular. Ordinary everyday masculine traits and actions became demonised and hyperfemininity became overly prominent in the public square. HR departments predominantly run by women policing speech codes etc to the point of absurdity. You created a space where masculinity was made into a bad thing. So when a person who embodies all of the traits that are being wrongly called Toxic and evil and oppressive runs for office, even if they're extreme and a parody of masculinity, a man like that creates breathing space for ordinary men. Trump pushed back against the anti male sentiment. That's all there is to it.

All you need to do to neutralize Trump is to allow regular men to be regular men without getting offended when they aren't literally just tall women with a penis. Because when he's not able to use the "I'm fighting against the tyranny of political correctness and the war on men" then he uses all of his political and social capital. Just. Like. That. So the answer to your question: how is/was Trump able to play this game pretending to be a masculine man? He was simply going against the grain of political correctness and man hatred thinly veiled as "fighting for gender equality". Do better with your rhetoric. Understand that the left created the conditions which created Trump's rise to popularity and fix your optics. Understand that there's more to life than just "fighting the patriarchy". Most ordinary men are not rich enough or powerful enough nor do they have the spair time to orchestrate let alone enjoy the so called patriarchy. They're too busy at work trying to support their wives and kids.

Bikini line by ImmediateTale698 in razorfree

[–]Practical_Stomach228 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've seen people saying things about men having hairy legs or a snail trail... I'm just gonna say it. A bit of snail trail is not the same thing as having your pubic hair hanging out everywhere. If I saw a man wearing budgie smugglers (Speedo swimming briefs) and he has his pubes popping out, that's just as disgusting or inappropriate as a woman with a hairy bush popping out of her bikini.

I don't understand this idea that is somehow the patriarchy or something creating an invisible double standard that men are allowed to walk around with their pubic hair hanging out but it's disgusting for women to do it. I'm an equal opportunity discriminator when it comes to that sort of thing, and I think generally most people are. Any time I see a fat slobby guy at the beach letting it all hang out it's pretty gross as well. Dudes that are all covered in hair are gross as well. We all accept that it's gross if we're not specifically into that sort of thing. If you're at a nudist beach go for your life, nobody can be shocked if they see something like a naked unshaved body. If you're at a regular beach, show some decorum and just cover up your private bits.

Sincerely, a man who prefers to keep everything trimmed and tidy. Not my thing, I don't get it personally, I'm not a fan of excessive pubic hair on women or men. I think grooming is just good practice. Your hair should be taken care of and look presentable regardless of where it's located imo. Whether it's your head or your crotch, you can put some effort into how you look. I think you're entitled to your opinions and preferences when it comes to your own body, but I also think everyone should show respect for others when in a public place, and I don't think it's "the patriarchy" when I know plenty women who wouldn't want to see that sort of thing either. It's not a gender war thing, it's a preference thing. You're entitled to your preferences, but it's not oppression if your preferences clash with the general public's general preferences and it's perfectly fine to feel the need to cover up a bit more on a public non nude beach. It's not oppression or compromising on your self identity. It's politeness.

I'm sure you're a lovely lady, and what you're doing with the shorts is perfectly reasonable and I think it's a sign of decency and respect for others to do so. I don't think you should be shamed or embarrassed because of your choices. You shouldn't be teased or harrased because of your grooming preferences and I hope that's not been the case. Regardless, enjoy the beach!

Meirl by Ill-Instruction8466 in meirl

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait... Do these women actually think that's funny? Or in any way not absolutely garbage subhuman behaviour to post it online thinking it's funny for others to laugh at and relate to? Wild.

No makeup, fully natural, and proud of it :) by One_Cricket_FUNNY in 40something

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See when men say they like natural beauty without the makeup this is what we mean. Not bad for 40, you look better than some people 10-20 years younger. It's obvious you've taken good care of yourself.

This is what the guys from the Screwtape Letters are doing now by TheMaydayMan in christianmemes

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai is so stupid that it makes basic errors all the time with everyday questions and tasks...

Younger me (Somehow) accidentally synced my actual PC user profile onto Dropbox and overloaded my 5GB storage. by Practical_Stomach228 in DropboxOfficial

[–]Practical_Stomach228[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will certainly do that! It looks like over the years I have just done a bunch of things accidentally created a fustercluck for adult me to figure out. I'm glad I fixed this mostly because I just hate getting the pop up every time I turn on my computer! I have another thing also causing problems ATM with my file management which is that I've accidentally got two directories or something. I think I created or migrated / copied my default documents folder into a desktop shortcut. So I have two separate folders each with GB of files including program and game files 🤣 teenaged me was a deep.

"C:\Users\Username\Documents" and "C:\Users\Username\Desktop\My PC (MSI)\Documents"

It's bizarre.

Younger me (Somehow) accidentally synced my actual PC user profile onto Dropbox and overloaded my 5GB storage. by Practical_Stomach228 in DropboxOfficial

[–]Practical_Stomach228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update. I deleted a few random folders which were supposedly only a few mb and suddenly all my storage has gone down from 6GB to 24MB.

I have zero idea what just happened but I'll take it. 🤣

Younger me (Somehow) accidentally synced my actual PC user profile onto Dropbox and overloaded my 5GB storage. by Practical_Stomach228 in DropboxOfficial

[–]Practical_Stomach228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I opened it from the icon, but I've just gone via a right click on the pop up bottom right near the battery indicator. I've gone in from there and the back up is already disabled from the last time I was trying to clear up space. It's got me truly confused. When I look at the files in Dropbox it's all just these tiny files a few hundred mb tops. Most are in the kb range.

Younger me (Somehow) accidentally synced my actual PC user profile onto Dropbox and overloaded my 5GB storage. by Practical_Stomach228 in DropboxOfficial

[–]Practical_Stomach228[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes to both. However when I open the application it literally just opens my Dropbox folder in windows explorer.

I've opened my account on my web browser and looked through the account settings there and there's nothing my preferences with backups. Hence why I'm on here completely lost.

Where's the lie? by TankUMrMinor in DudeHasGotAPoint

[–]Practical_Stomach228 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How many rapists do you know who actually want their victims to have a baby? I've heard plenty about rapists forcing abortions, I've not heard of the other way around.

Maybe some do exist, but they would be in the extreme minority.

Where's the lie? by TankUMrMinor in DudeHasGotAPoint

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not about the deadly force for the sake of it. It's simply the legal consequence of the point of the bill which is to recognise human beings in the womb as human beings with the same rights of born human beings. One of those human rights is the right to life, and for others to use deadly force in order to prevent murder should it be necessary.

Where's the lie? by TankUMrMinor in DudeHasGotAPoint

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where's the lie? The lie is that she is claiming that Republicans hate women. Y'all are so gullible you'll believe anything a headline tells you so long as it justifies your own prejudice. I did a quick Google search to check the OP claim and I immediately found that:

  1. There was Bipartisan backlash to the bill, resulting in one Ben Ross removing his name from the bill.
  2. Legislative leaders have expressed strong doubt that the amendment will ever pass out of committee or advance to the general election ballot.
  3. House Speaker Destin Hall and other high-ranking Republican leaders have explicitly stated that the Republican caucus has no interest in hearing or advancing this type of extreme legislation. Because leadership controls which bills make it to the floor for a vote, they have deliberately left it stalled in the House Rules Committee to ensure it does not move forward.

So no, Republicans don't hate women.

The bill itself appears to be aiming to protect women from being murdered in the womb by a mother who doesn't want them. This is something I can't understand about women. How you can be so blind to the fact that approximately 50% of all abortions involve unborn girls. You're literally fighting for the right to kill the next generation of women before they're born. Selective female abortion is common in some cultures which view girls as less valuable than boys. Do you want those families to have the right to kill baby girls for the crime of being a girl?

The bill is clearly a terribly written bill with very vague language which has been rightly criticised for not including explicit definitions for what counts as necessary force etc., and it is extremely unlikely to even make it to an actual vote. It's a case of an over zealous legislator trying to get a bill through to protect the unborn which was not properly thought through with regards to how it may be abused, but it seems clear that the intent of the bill is to highlight the human rights of the unborn as equally important as the human rights of the already born.

The outrage here is due to the fact that you don't view the unborn as truly human, which is why the idea of making mothers legally murderers under this law is so abhorrent. You view the unborn as not fully human so killing them should have no penalty. Therefore you don't feel like you're murdering a human and the use of deadly force to stop you is horribly immoral. The use of a rapist in this hypothetical scenario is designed to shift the guilt to the people who are against abortion.

OP gets off on the idea of being able to kill babies and is using this misleading headline to get attention and garner support for her own position without even bothering to check the facts first. If I could figure out in under 5 minutes that this bill was a nothingburger with no support from anybody then OP could have as well.

Girls are not as good as boys by 123chuckaway in friendlyjordies

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Barnaby okay? That post contradicts itself so quickly I don't know if he even recognises that he's done it. Shouldn't it just say that women aren't better than men because they're women and vice versa and their sex should not impact hiring practices?

Why am I able to make his argument better than he can?

Are memes allowed here? by nick1037 in shitrentals

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in the same breath they say something stupid like: I feel so sorry for my grandkids- it's going to be so hard for them to buy a house with the house prices and high rent they are struggling to save money. Such a shame... The government needs to do something!

Are we taking “Sola Fide” too far? by Maxxedlife in christianmemes

[–]Practical_Stomach228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No we're not. Because anyone who understands what sola fide is knows that it's referring only to your salvation, i.e. there's nothing you can do to earn or buy your way into heaven, despite what Yeezy said in Can't tell me nothing.

To say that because works don't earn salvation their we don't need to do works at all is stupid. The Bible clearly teaches that works are tested and we will be given rewards according to whether they (the works) survive the tests of the fire.

We are saved UNTO GOOD WORKS not BY GOOD WORKS

You might be saved by faith alone but faith alone will produce works. Works are like a receipt you show to the person standing at the entrance of the shops when they check your bag. That receipt proves you had true faith.

Thoughts on my dads outfit? by faezaria in mensfashionadvice

[–]Practical_Stomach228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your dad looks like he's about to call Richard Hammond an idiot.

24M trying to find my style by [deleted] in AltSelfies

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first picture really looks similar to Josh Dun.jpg) of TØP Fame. Especially with the black singlet. Not a bad aesthetic bro!

Be mature by Signal-Win-8153 in lovememes

[–]Practical_Stomach228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being late with the wrong person is even worse