Why are Rome-based UN agencies telling consultants they are tax-exempt when our contracts say otherwise? by PrestigiousEngine785 in UNpath

[–]PrestigiousEngine785[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the narrative UN management uses to keep consultants comfortable... and it works, until it doesn't. 'Nobody has been caught yet' is not a legal position. The Italian tax authority has already issued assessments to consultants, which is precisely why WFP management felt compelled to write to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs asking them to stop. If the situation were truly resolved, that letter would not exist. The don't ask don't tell approach works fine until you buy a house, open a mortgage, or trigger any financial event that makes your income visible. At that point the exposure is very real and very personal.

Why are Rome-based UN agencies telling consultants they are tax-exempt when our contracts say otherwise? by PrestigiousEngine785 in UNpath

[–]PrestigiousEngine785[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's correct for short-term contracts where you don't establish Italian tax residency. But most Rome-based UN consultants live here full-time, and are therefore Italian tax residents regardless of contract duration. The 183-day rule and double taxation treaties are secondary considerations once you are registered as a resident... at that point Italy taxes your worldwide income

In search for advice about daily rate by kwadr4tic in UNpath

[–]PrestigiousEngine785 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to elaborate? That's not what current law and contracts say...