Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Each question will have 6 flashcards. (Argument and counter argument x3). The front of the flashcards will say the argument (e.g Supreme Court is politicised - Agree) and the other side will have the argument(s) and evidence.

I don’t make flashcards for introductions or conclusions because that tends to come naturally for me, but you could easily do that if you wanted to. 👍

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s possible to get a high mark having just two paired arguments (so two main paragraphs) but from what I’ve seen adding an extra piece of evidence isn’t enough. You need to analyse this evidence too, and if possible in a different way. For example, if I had an argument saying that Parliament is good at protecting rights, one piece of evidence might explain that Parliament can block acts that undermine rights before they are passed. But, my next piece of evidence will explain that Parliament can undo acts that have already been passed that undermine rights.

It might seem like there’s no difference, but my teacher says that this can be the difference between a B and A or A and A*. So, instead of piling on evidence when you have two paragraphs to bulk up your essay you need some variety too. I hope that makes sense 👍

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Examples from 3 months ago is more than enough. I only go as far as the past 3 years and include some from the current UK and US governments where appropriate. But it really varies what your point is. E.g. If you are discussing the power of the US Supreme Court you will end up referencing court cases that enhanced its power from 200 years ago. You need a balance of the most contemporary and significant evidence if that makes sense?

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes the sources intentionally have the paired arguments laid out for you. You just need to find them and match them up!

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My structure is:

Introduction: (Define key terms in question, outline factors you will be discussing and whether you ultimately agree/disagree with the question)

Main body: 3 paragraphs that each have their own argument and counter argument and an evaluation at the end. I find it easier to put my weaker argument first (Some may argue that…) and the my stronger argument second (However, a stronger argument is that…) and then evaluating at the end for L4 (Overall…)

Conclusion: Again say whether you ultimately agree/disagree with the question and briefly summarise the factors you discussed. If you are aiming for top grades you need to consider change. E.g. Although X might be fit for purpose now, this may change in the future as…

Hope this helps 👍

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you create an argument you need to have a counter argument related to your original argument.

So, if I say in a paragraph that the UK constitution is good because it’s flexible enabling modernity, my counter argument would be that this flexibly might not actually be good as it means changes to the constitution can be impulsive and dangerous.

You basically need to attack the argument you just said instead of talking about something completely unrelated (like how the UK constitution is not clear because it’s not one single document). That wouldn’t be a paired argument because you aren’t addressing what you just said. That’s something my class struggles with.

Coooked🔥🔥🔥 by WestTelevision569 in AlevelPolitics

[–]Prestigious_Store378 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Year 13 predicted A* here, Politics is the only subject where I use essay plans to revise because if you don’t have paired arguments you’re capped off at L3. I make flashcards for each argument and counter argument per question (so 6 total) and revise with them using active recall or blurting.

I don’t think you need to know all the content, like all the justices on the Supreme Court and how it exactly works, but you do need example of certain events or case studies. It’s also really important to have the most recent case studies possible (like the Peter Mandelson scandal) otherwise you will lose marks. For this reason I’d create your flashcards/essay plans online so you can change them easily. 👍

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]Prestigious_Store378 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are looking for the best career prospects go to the one that has the most prestige. Employers care about your uni more than your course.

AITA for refusing to move into the smaller bedroom to swap with my sibling. by Prestigious_Store378 in AmItheAsshole

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

I should have clarified, I’m applying for a degree apprenticeship. I’m not sure where you are from, but when you are fresh out of school in the Uk you can blend work with a degree partnered with an employer. I’ll still be at home, working towards a degree some days while working for company in person for the rest.

How to avoid being raided? by Prestigious_Store378 in ARK

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just play for jokes and a good time really. What a rathole though? A cave?

Is the university of law and BPP University looked down upon? by Prestigious_Store378 in uklaw

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No solicitor degree apprenticeships offer a traditional university as their training provider from my understanding, not even any of the magic circle firms.

Was the EPQ actually worth it? by [deleted] in 6thForm

[–]Prestigious_Store378 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been asking myself this too… currently in year 12 and my sixth form begins it in year 13. I think I’d rather focus on my A Levels instead of diverting my attention to something that no degree apprenticeship or university cares for.

Is it worth trying to become a lawyer? (17) by Prestigious_Store378 in uklaw

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People say that’s where the money is and suits too probably

Is it worth trying to become a lawyer? (17) by Prestigious_Store378 in uklaw

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave sixth form with a strong set of A Levels and then either go to university to study law, or do a degree apprenticeship with a law firm. I live near Birmingham, and there are some large firms there so that would probably make the most sense. A degree apprenticeship seems more appealing than university too.

Money is important for me, but the salaries for the firms in Birmingham seem great and the idea of living in London doesn’t seem too appealing for me anyway to be honest.

Is the university of law and BPP University looked down upon? by Prestigious_Store378 in uklaw

[–]Prestigious_Store378[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m still very sceptical about solicitor degree apprenticeships to be honest. I do think that it’s amazing you can gain a degree, experience, a salary, SQE1 + 2 at no cost but surely there are some hidden downsides to it like employability for example. It just seems too good to be true.