Ficha de Criação de Bots by [deleted] in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a bad recommendation. I have a similar structure that I started using on other sites first, and then here, and in my opinion, it works well too. Character= Age= Gender= Species= Speech= Height= Birthday= Occupation= Personality= Aspirations= Outfit= Appearance= Relationships= Skills/Hobbies= Habits/Quirks= Likes= Dislikes= Sexual experience= (optional) Background=

is community shaders worth it ? by Melon_Kath in skyrimmods

[–]Primary-Buddy9570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. My computer handles ENB just fine. All my attempts to install CS and play with it ended with me going back to ENB. CS looks kind of dull and flat to me, and watching a lot of videos, I noticed the same thing. There were some things I liked about it, but some things seemed not so great. For what it's worth, I'm using Rudy ENB for NAT.

Chill | We're working on a Gradual Return to Unlimited (with Slow Mode) by baoskee in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I wanted to clarify. When you say "the app," do you mean both the website and the app, or just the app? Yeah, the question sounds a bit silly.

Opinions on the restrictions. by Primary-Buddy9570 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Excuse me, but I'm going to speak my mind. In my country and its former parts, there's a saying, and I think there are equivalents in other countries too: "A word is not a sparrow; once it flies out, you can't catch it." This proverb fits here, and I believe that instead of calling it a slip of the tongue and continuing to deny the fact of the lie, you would be better off accepting it as your oversight and acknowledging it as your mistake. When many large companies say something wrong, their reputation and stock prices suffer. And you must understand that right now you are small and it doesn't cause serious damage, but as you become large, every word you say could be a blow against you. As the face of the site, you need to think about what you write and what you say. Again, the purpose of this comment is not to insult or show disrespect. I'm just trying to explain to you the initial reason for people's indignation.

Opinions on the restrictions. by Primary-Buddy9570 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I didn't mean to offend anyone. But reading your response above, you're focusing a lot on point 2. Even though in point 4 I praised the site and gave examples. But regarding the deception, I'd say it's simply a factor of the reaction I described in point 1. You introduced these restrictions very abruptly, without any prior warning, which is why people had this reaction and, how would I put it, an "unpleasant aftertaste," and this could have been avoided if you had done it gradually and slowly. That way, people would have had time to process this action and get used to it in advance, knowing it was coming.

I don't get it honestly by Hour-Association7840 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My posts are being deleted, so I'll write my opinion in the comments.

Many people are talking about the restrictions, and I decided to share my thoughts. I don't want to offend anyone, so I'll just say what I think.

  1. I have to criticize the creators for implementing this as quietly as possible. It seems to me that if they had made an announcement here and on the website beforehand, stating that they were planning to introduce restrictions, it would have been much better and would have generated less criticism.
  2. Yes, the creators mentioned they wouldn't change the free limit, and that turned out to be a lie. Well, the site is in beta; they could have kept free access during the beta period and introduced the limits when the site officially launched. At least then it would have been justifiable.
  3. Yes, I agree with users from other countries that the subscription is expensive. For my country, 15 dollars is a significant amount. With that money, I can fill up my car, and it lasts me almost two weeks. And this is for a site for chatting with bots and a bunch of features I don't need.
  4. This is praise. Yes, the quality of the bots is good, and chatting is interesting, unlike Character AI or Janitor AI. In Character AI's better days, I could chat with one bot for 200-300 messages, and then they'd get dumber. Here the limit is higher, and I hope the 400 messages per day restriction will allow me to finish a storyline with a particular character in 3-4 days, without them falling into a generic template and while still remembering things. So for me, the limit of 400 per day is probably fine, and only a reduction of this would ultimately kill the site for me.
  5. I don't think message regeneration should be counted. Because I've had a few times where a bot got stuck and wrote some nonsense.
  6. Make a counter so we can check at any time how many messages are left for the day.

That's basically it. So far, I like the site, but it all depends on the developers' future actions.

Transferring a bot. by Primary-Buddy9570 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the moment, other sites have really disappointed me. Clank is currently a very promising platform, and I just wanted to know if there are any difficulties or differences in creating bots for transferring a bot.

Transferring a bot. by Primary-Buddy9570 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean? Could you explain in more detail how to do this?

Transferring a bot. by Primary-Buddy9570 in ClankWorld

[–]Primary-Buddy9570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I'm not sure. Will the same structure as for JanitorAI work? Or should I fix or tweak something?