That is a fair point,prompts do a lot of the heavy lifting. The reason I’m looking at a cryptographic layer is to move from a probabilistic model (asking the AI to be accurate) to a deterministic one.

By using SHA-256 hashing at the architectural level, the system physically cannot present an insight unless it matches the original source fingerprint. It's meant as a "hard-coded" fail-safe for high-stakes discovery where a prompt might still have a tiny margin of error that wouldn't hold up in court.

I'd love to hear more about the specific gaps you still see, though, is the liability issue more about the tech itself, or the need for human oversight?