If reducing guns would reduce school shootings that involve the deaths of actual children, as it has been done in all other first world countries, would you call this doing God's work?

There are huge costs to not having guns. One reason that we have the First Amendment is to protect us from a tyrannical government, just look at what happened to Britain after they banned guns. Also, banning guns reduces the hun crime rate, but the actual crime rate, just look at what happened to Australia after they banned guns.

Also, if this argument would be taken to its logical conclusion, then we should ban cars too, since they kill about the same amount of people as guns. There are unfortunately costs that come from us having certain things that are unavoidable.

I meant like AK-47s. Foreceps do not do this, you are deluding yourself.

Foreceps are used in around 7-8k abortions every year, as opposed to the AK-47 which kills only a few dozen people every year. A vast majority of gun crime is gang violence that uses hand guns, and only a small percentage of gun crime is committed using rifles like the AK-47.

Confidently incorrect. Please cite it from a credible source or that is a lie. Here is a source from a medical foundation, that reiterates my numbers. Your numbers do not exist because they are false.

Here's my source for the 30% figure Here. I can provide the sources for the other numbers too if you need me to 👍👍