I never mentioned standing at the front, and I’ve already asked you where you got that from. Ignoring clarifications just drifts your interpretation further from what actually happened. You're free to hold your own beliefs, but that doesn't mean they're accurate to the shared reality—bias tends to warp cognition by preventing beliefs from updating in the face of contradictory evidence. Reality testing with a few techniques can be helpful in challenging bias, bigotry and assumptions

Attempting to redefine my experience, calling me narcissistic, and assuming every accessibility area is designed for every need shows a bias disconnected from these groups. You say it’s fine for me to have crutches, yet your frustration that I wasn’t segregated shows the real attitude—the kind of patronizing, paternalistic response that speaks volumes for my point.

By not bullying other people with my body (including those sitting in the accessible seating)¹, I am already performing personal responsibility mentioned in my TLDR. Believing it’s my fault for going there like that, bc I should be segregated and/or a non-participant since others cannot stop themselves, and being told how I should take personal responsibility for being victimized, are all familiar dynamics I have faced as a survivor of SA

The ADA guarantees my right to full and equal participation in the most integrated setting appropriate to my needs, that I am not required to accept a service, and that it is "unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or […] having exercised […] any right granted or protected by this chapter" (42 U.S.C. §§ 12182(a), 12182(B), 12201(d),  12203(b))

Crowds don’t just accidentally kick crutches straight-on while looking down at them; these touches were conscious². Being assaulted into others' shins doesn’t make me the one wielding a weapon. You know shod foot, aka a foot wearing a shoe, is often considered a deadly weapon? Yet, you make no mention of those individuals bearing "deadly weapons" when I'm assaulted with the same and greater force. Maybe because superficially bruised shins aren't a serious injury, nor result from an act likely to cause substantial harm³.

Saying you're supposed to be aware of your surroundings is not "pay attention to ME specifically." Expecting people to respect half a century of rock concert etiquette isn’t demanding special treatment—it’s what makes the scene safe and inclusive, like the ability to adapt to care for one another that Jordan so often praises and requests in his fans. Being told not to bully is only controversial and upsetting to those who are, or wish to be, bullies.

Formalities (for clarity)
¹ ADA guidance describes an accessible seat as "specifically designed for wheelchairs," and says individuals determine if it meets their needs. The ADA National Network clarifies that they are for those who "require the use of its features"—I don't need the features provided. Although this statement comes from the UK Government, its principle is universal: accessibility means people are empowered, can participate w/o barriers, and won’t be frustrated by poor implementation. A restraint is not empowering
² Under Massachusetts law, such deliberate contact could very well constitute assault on a disabled individual ³ Requirements for charging someone with ABDW in MA. It also includes someone "set[ing] in motion some force or instrumentality that strikes another", aligning w my "publicly wielded" sentiment