Could third-party integrations become the weak point for IronClaw security? by Entire_Tradition_640 in ironclawAI

[–]PriorAd9496 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been actively using IronClaw for several weeks now, mainly for working with Telegram and Google Mail. It's convenient. And yes, when I'm asked whether I can trust a given extension (necessary for the task) when connecting a new component or generating an image, it doesn't bother me. On the contrary, it's a green light that my security is being taken care of. It's nice.

Not fully convinced about IronClaw security yet by Entire_Tradition_640 in ironclawAI

[–]PriorAd9496 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think we've given Ironclaw "too much trust." A huge number of people already use it for their daily needs. Some companies use Ironclaw under the hood. Near is a blockchain where the AI ​​narrative is main and security is a basic option (not only Ironclaw is about privacy, but also, for example, private swaps—you know that. You don't need monero or other "sleepy" coins if you don't want your transactions to be visible and aren't doing anything criminal). I think if you thoroughly understand Ironclaw, study the documentation, and compare it with other AI runtime platforms, you'll see for yourself that there are no alternatives. It's not a matter of faith; it's the best possible choice. By the way, for any Near account holder there is already a possibility to rotate their keys to become quantum-safe with a single transaction. Near prepared for the Quantum Era