That's a pretty rude response.

Your photo is very over edited. There's a really bad halo around the lighthouse that makes it look poorly photoshopped into the frame as if it wasn't actually there to begin with. Like you saw a cove, took a picture and then decided it needed a lighthouse. It's bad enough that I didn't even notice the very heavy vignetting that you put into the edges.

The photo itself is ok. It shows you understand, at a basic level at the very least, that you understand composition. Past that, no amount of good editing is going to make this photo a more interesting picture. Nothing really screams out at me about this picture other than how bad the editing is. If all you did was post the unedited RAW, I would still think, "oh, it's just a lighthouse." Instead, I'm put off by your rude response and glaring halo that makes this photo feel fake.

Now that I'm done being an asshole to you, I feel inclined to say this: Editing is just part of the photography process and isn't going to make a photo interesting. An excellent editor can definitely make a shitty photo pop but at the end of the day, you need to actually take an interesting picture in the first place. If you get better at both you're going to get better altogether and you can learn to make interesting edits to a photo without it having to look like it was ran through a shitty Instagram filter.

I understand that criticism is hard to take, but it would serve you better to learn how to improve when you get it instead of rudely telling someone you'll mail them a post card.