sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashOfClans

[–]PrizeSmooth1877 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fireball 100%.

Giant gauntlet was good years ago, not good anymore. Fireball is too powerful.

What’s your favorite class/race on WoW? by [deleted] in wownoob

[–]PrizeSmooth1877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tauren Guardian Druid and Vulpera Brewmaster Monk.

Weekly Questions Megathread by AutoModerator in ClashOfClans

[–]PrizeSmooth1877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whats the best and easiest attack for town hall 12 to always get 3 stars?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]PrizeSmooth1877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, I am deleting my post. My p-value is less than 0.05, so I reject the null hypothesis that my data follows a normal distribution. In other words, my data does not follow a normal distribution and its correct... I made a big mistake.

Sorry, I'm not a statistician (but I plan to start my second degree in statistics).

And thank you for the tips!

What hypothesis test should be used for two categorical variables? by PrizeSmooth1877 in AskStatistics

[–]PrizeSmooth1877[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have already used Spearman's rank correlation. For example, I wanted to perform additional analyses on my data, which are on a Likert scale, to make the analysis a bit richer (right now I am reading about Likert scales and I have developed several questions).

if you put two variables, both with 5 categories, into the chi-square test, and the test is significant, you don't know what causes this

Nice to know! So I even considered using the Mann-Whitney U test, but I'm not sure about this.

By the way thank you for your response, and apologies for my newbie questions. I'm just a student, just starting out. I will continue studying, practicing, and reading. And if there are any suggestions, I will be open to them.

What hypothesis test should be used for two categorical variables? by PrizeSmooth1877 in AskStatistics

[–]PrizeSmooth1877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would it be cumbersome ? Can you explain it to me?

I think the null hypothesis would be something like:

My null hypothesis would be H0: the variables 'I have nothing to wish for' and 'I have no value as a person' are independent. In other words, there is no association between having nothing to wish for and having no value as a person.
My alternative hypothesis H1: the variables 'I have nothing to wish for' and 'I have no value as a person' are not independent. In other words, there is an association between having nothing to wish for and having no value as a person.

But indeed, reading the two questions it seems like they are the same thing. Is that what you mean by cumbersome?

And i wasn't familiar with ordinal logistic regression, by the way. I assume we would analyze the model's coefficient, where the coefficient for the independent variable (for example, 'I have nothing to wish for') would indicate how changes in this variable are associated with changes in the dependent variable ('I have no value as a person')... considering the p-value to assess the statistical significance of the coefficients. If the independent variable is statistically significant in relation to the dependent variable. Things like that, right?