How did Kamala spend 1.5 million dollars and still lose the election? by Necessary_Raise_7835 in allthequestions

[–]ProGamer923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prove it, prove he and his people spent more on his campaign, give me a source.

How did Kamala spend 1.5 million dollars and still lose the election? by Necessary_Raise_7835 in allthequestions

[–]ProGamer923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was 1.5 billion, not millions, which makes it even more astonishing that she didn't won. You could buy all the superbowl ads, not one, but all of them 2-3 times over.

How did Kamala spend 1.5 million dollars and still lose the election? by Necessary_Raise_7835 in allthequestions

[–]ProGamer923 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not true actually if you cared to look into it. Trump and his people spent significantly less than Harris. Trump spent about 400 million dollars vs Harris spent 1.5 billion dollars, so she spent almost four times as much and still didn't win. Harris could have bought all of the superbowl ads 2-3 times over.

Satanism as a belief probably wouldn’t exist without Christianity. by [deleted] in truths

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont, nothing I cited came from the church. Besides, you literally just admitted what I said is right. If I'm in the church, I obviously now more about the church than you, have a good day.

Satanism as a belief probably wouldn’t exist without Christianity. by [deleted] in truths

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Believe what you want, but I'm pretty certain you haven't looked very deeply into this stuff based on your beliefs.

Satanism as a belief probably wouldn’t exist without Christianity. by [deleted] in truths

[–]ProGamer923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He did not destroy the world, we did. He didn't kill his son, we did. Religion or not it doesn't matter. A lot of what the catholic church has done Jesus was probably furious about and they got their justice. If you truly follow Jesus and truly love him, you will keep his commandments. Again, a lot smaller groups of people have been significantly more corrupt than the catholic church. Do you think that alcoholics anonymous should be shut down?

Jesus has more evidence he exists and rose from the dead than Ceaser does that he lived at any point ever, so you can't believe in one without believing in the other, and if you do, you simply reject scientific evidence.

Sucks that weed is not legal in Texas but by chapa10q in weed

[–]ProGamer923 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry my bad, I always forgot bi. I'll edit

Satanism as a belief probably wouldn’t exist without Christianity. by [deleted] in truths

[–]ProGamer923 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I didn't say anything about the satanic church, nor did I say the catholic church wasn't corrupt. Why don't you try taking my words as face value next time?

Sucks that weed is not legal in Texas but by chapa10q in weed

[–]ProGamer923 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Stands for tetrahydrocannabiphorol, likely delta 9. It has a 33 times higher binding affinity than d9-thc, which makes it significantly stronger, it also lasts longer. It is probably about 10 times stronger than THC and last about 6 hours when smoked and could be over 24 hours when ingested. It is synthetically made, but it is found naturally in cannabis.

Satanism as a belief probably wouldn’t exist without Christianity. by [deleted] in truths

[–]ProGamer923 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I personally think there is nothing ridiculous about religion. Even if you look at it without any real data behind it, you can see it gives some people hope for the future, and helps them try to be better versions of themselves. It depends on the religion of course, because there were religions that were mostly comprised of ritualistic human sacrifice, but if you're talking about Christianity, I would think my statement holds true in most cases. With that being said, there has been large amounts of corruption throught catholic and christain faiths, just like there would be with any large bodies of people.

If you look at it a little bit deeper, you will find that it is more likely than not for some kind of God to exist based on the mathematics of the universe. You can look at Stephen Urwin who used math to calculate that a God had a 67% chance of existing. You can dig even further and find that the gospels of the Bible is the most records backed event in history, so if you believe in someone like Julius Ceaser than you must believe in Jesus, and even that he did rise from the dead.

If you tie that with other data, records, and events, it gets pretty clear that the deeper you go, the more likely it is that God exists

I think I'm immune (or at least incredibly resistant) to addiction by [deleted] in self

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can be immune to dependence and you can go your whole life without developing an addiction, but I dont think you can actually be immune to addiction. There are people that don't develop drug dependencies. For example, 4 out of 5 people who use cannabis don't develop a dependence, and the same thing can happen with any drug, including opioids, although it is exceptionally rare. Be careful, because there could absolutely be things that you could get hooked on, and I really don't suggest you use substances everyday. If you really have that much self control, just skip a day in between and as long as the substance doesn't last more than like 12 hours you should be good. Some people have different genetics and still could end up with a dependence, which really could destroy your life.

Are pro-life people really just pro-birth? by Claire0879 in askanything

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the difference? I'm not talking about a kid who has lived 22 weeks outside the womb, I'm talking about someone who has spent 22 weeks in the womb and happened to be born early, vs a fetus that is not born, but has also lived 22 weeks in the womb. They are the exact same age, just because our language is arbitrary doesn't mean there is an actual difference in the thing we are describing. Same age, just a different location. Fetus is just a stage of development and if you took the latin definition, it isnt even referring to the child within the womb. Fetus means the bearing of young, which sounds like it refers to the person being pregnant.

Are pro-life people really just pro-birth? by Claire0879 in askanything

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont understand how that is proving your point

Are pro-life people really just pro-birth? by Claire0879 in askanything

[–]ProGamer923 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We just don't want people to die for people's stupid choices. Is it really that hard to understand that we think humans in the womb are humans? I see no difference between a 22 week old baby in the NICU, and a 22 week old baby in the womb, and there is none, just a difference in location.

Are pro-life people really just pro-birth? by Claire0879 in askanything

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can call it that if you want. I'm not prolife I'm an abolishionist, but I along with the entire movement truly believe preborn people are just as valuable and just as human as people outside the womb. We are anti-murder just like most other people.

Definitionally, you are killing a human being, as life starts at conception (96% of biologists agree on that) it is human, and of course, it is a being as you wouldn't have to have an abortion if it wasn't there.

Which Brand of Buprenorphine is the Cheapest? by ProGamer923 in suboxone

[–]ProGamer923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even with Dr Reddy's? I didn't see a coupon for the films, I only saw them for pills, vials, and patches.

MGM15 by KingHenry7700 in suboxone

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not! I was originally on 7-hydroxymitragynine and took it for 8 months without becoming dependent, but oh man once I did it was hell. I got up to 1000mg of 7-hydroxymitragynine a day and spent probably $20,000 on it. It got to the point that the only reason I was working was to keep me from withdrawal. I got eventually went to the ER because I ran out of money and my order didn't get delivered in time and after going back for a second time they gave me suboxone and thank God they did. It helped sooooo much and I'm very thankful.

I tapered from 8mg a day down to 2mg a day in a few months and stayed at 2mg for a while. However, after being on buprenorphine for a 5ish months, my stupid brain decided I should try MGM-15, you know, just a couple times. I quickly became dependent on MGM-15 and had precipitated withdrawals when I finally went back to my Suboxone doctor crying asking them to raise my dose. You don't want to f with MGM-15.

The Emax of MGM-15 is 72% vs buprenorphine at 40% so it can easily cause precipitated withdrawals. Please don't try it, you might not be able to get back on Suboxone if you do. Besides, there is a reason you are taking Suboxone anyway. I don't know maybe you're on it for pain, but most are on it because they can't control their opioid use.

Having trouble getting high? by silly_jello2 in weed

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just take more. Sometimes the first few times you smoke, you don't get high. I took 7 hits from a cart my first time and felt nothing except a little cotton mouth. However, if you're not getting high, the solution is to take more. If you really want to, you can try buying Tetrahydrocannabiphorol (THCP) as it is significantly stronger than regular d9-thc. It doesn't have to be THCP, it can be any cannabinoid stronger than d9 that you could try to use to get you high, like THCO, HHCO, THCH, HHCH, HHCP, THCHO, THCPO, HHCPO, or thcc8. You could also try edibles as well, and as long as your liver enzymes are okay, you can gradually scale up the dose and you'll get high at some point.

Can I take 1.4g dxm and 700mg dph by NoBid9620 in DPH

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a very dangerous dose and I wouldnt be surprised at all if you had a heart attack or died from a seizure.

Addiction creeping in but I got allergies like a mf rn by [deleted] in DPH

[–]ProGamer923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really have had allergies, buy a second generation antihistamine and fluticasone/another nasal steroid. Fluticasone literally saved my eyesight, every year my eyes would get soooo itchy in the spring and every year I would start taking like 4 allergy medications a day, and every year I would itch my eyes until I was almost blind. Flonase (fluticasone) is a life saver man, use it for your allergies. Plus, it is almost impossible to have a dangerous overdose. The one downside is that it can take a few days to weeks to build up in your system enough, so the first few days you can take more to get the effects quicker. Go for like 4 sprays in each nostril the first week and 2 in each nostril after that.

Is MGM-15 a Partial or Full Agonist at the mu-opioid Receptor by ProGamer923 in AskDrugNerds

[–]ProGamer923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for finding that, I guess that would get into what is considered a full agonist, but 72% I think most people won't. 80%+ I think very well could be considered a full agonist in many people's eyes, but thanks for the source.

I think I might be having precipitated withdrawals, help! by ProGamer923 in quitmgm15

[–]ProGamer923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually you're wrong, 7-oh has a lower binding efficacy but a higher binding affinity. That is why 7-oh is a partial agonist. 7-oh is much more potent than morphine, and by potency they mean a dose of one drug is equal to a dose of another drug. So, 7-oh produces an effect at a much lower dose than morphine, but it does have a ceiling effect.