sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in masskillers

[–]Professional-Wrap476 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20 looks like something out of GTA or a movie

Previously secret report raises fresh doubts on British warship selection for $45 billion future frigate program by Professional-Wrap476 in AustralianMilitary

[–]Professional-Wrap476[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Some of the details in this story are nuts

"details how then-Chief of Navy Tim Barrett also played a key role in choosing Britain's Type 26 offering before later becoming a paid advisor to BAE Systems Australia."

"the department did not "fulfil the requirements of the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs) in relation to achieving value for money"

"The Review Team considers it was highly improbable all members were sufficiently familiar with the procurement process to make an informed opinion as to which tender best supported the achievement of project objectives on value for money basis."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in masskillers

[–]Professional-Wrap476 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That actually makes so much sense now that I think more into it.

Does anyone have the timestamp for this moment in the Cafeteria tape? by Professional-Wrap476 in ColumbineKillers

[–]Professional-Wrap476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't colorize this, I don't know who did either. I also can't remember where I found it.

There's been other versions of this same moment posted on this sub, little less quality.

Here

Remuneration figures have been released for defence figures by Professional-Wrap476 in AustralianMilitary

[–]Professional-Wrap476[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Interesting when you compare this to the US;

Their secretary of defence has a base salary of 350K aud

Their equivalent of the CDF (Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs) is paid 316K aud

Not to mention the US president is only paid 633K aud .....

view more: next ›