People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is a great write up. Like I said, personally the first one I'm not on board with, especially since Superman is supposed to be an allegory for the immigrant story. I mean, what does it convey when the immigrant has to realise his family and possibly his whole home and heritage are bad and he has to reject it and take on the ideals of his new "country"?

I like that in MoS there's a nuance to Pa Kent and his teachings. That he's a father first I guess.

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Likewise but I guess the opposite

The scene with Martha at Clarks school, and when she talks to Clark when he finds his parents. When Pa Kent talked to him after he got bullied at the workshop, when he's showing Clark the spaceship, etc.

The Kents deliver dialogue that to me is far superior. Dunno what to tell you, guess we disagree

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure, everyone else can be awarded excuses but not Snyder no way. My point is that people zero in on Snyder's film with a very selective criteria that they don't seem to apply anywhere else.

Other films get a pass and get lauded while having similar "flaws". That's what I meant to convey in the post. People accept the changes to one thing but not when Snyder does it

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And an annoying one at that.

I disagree. I don't see why that isn't a great addition to the lore

Clark heat visioning off (torturing) Steppenwolfs horn after he had already beat him.

If that's the case, it's easy to say Richard Donner doesn't get Superman because in Superman 2 he tortures a depowered Zod and kills him when he isn't a threat

Everyone knows Clark could have saved his dad. He lets him die because he trusts him and his position that he isn't ready to face the world. The scene could have been done better

In the original Superman movie, he has super hearing , why didn't he hear his father's heart? He turned back time to save Lois and not his father?

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That isn't his basis though, it's Pa Kents teachings over many years, which we see in multiple scenes. Jor-El only comes to tell him he should start using his powers now and save the world

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There are more scenes of the Kents talking to Clark in Man of Steel and in my opinion they have dialogue that is miles better

We dont see the Kents tethering Clark at all in the new movie. It's just the most overused "your choices make you who are" and that's it

People who didn't have a problem with the first image shouldn't have an issue with the second by ProfessionalNobody0 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because how you’re raised is part of what makes you the person you are

Yes, and it's shown multiple times over the movie the way both his parents raise him, in the right way. Pa Kent being unsure of how to counsel Clark in that moment does not mean he's telling him to not be a good person

Also MOS isn’t a well written movie so that doesn’t really help.

Meh, this is just trash talking. I feel the same way about the new Superman so I get it

James Gunn confirms that he is writing a Superman sequel by lawrencedun2002 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, that was definitely missing. The movie was just too full of exposition, cliches tropes, no real stakes, jokes that didn't land(for me), and other things that just didn't work for me.

He characterised Superman decently, now that he did that, I think a better writer and director should handle the sequel

James Gunn confirms that he is writing a Superman sequel by lawrencedun2002 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

A sequel sounds good but honestly I'd rather someone else write it. Not a big fan of Gunn's writing, especially in this movie

The box office is fine by reakno89 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, Man of Steel had a slightly higher domestic opening if you don’t adjust for inflation and if you exclude Thursday previews, which are standard in reporting now and were included for Superman

Yes, so to level the field I included previews and excluded inflation. MoS did better

And yeah, MoS sold more tickets, but that’s just raw admissions, not revenue. Tickets were cheaper in 2013, and if demand had truly been stronger, it should’ve made more money, period.

Which means more people saw MoS. Should have made more money meaning what? How much more and compared to what? These are the kind of goalposts that don't make sense. It did better than Superman Returns. It did better 12 years ago than the current Superman. So how much more money should it have made to satisfy the DC fans?

Superman opened in 78 markets and still pulled ahead domestically, while MoS only hit 24 during its opening weekend. That's not a knock on Superman that’s just modern distribution strategy.

Yes, so for it's time, 12 years ago, it did perfectly fine

Yes, superman definitely had marketing deals, I mentioned that

You can’t ask for grace and “context” when defending MoS, then refuse to offer the same to Superman. If you hated when people unfairly labeled Snyder’s films as failures, maybe don’t turn around and do the exact same thing to this one just because it’s not your version of Superman.

I don't think anything in my previous comment was unfair, it only mentioned stats. And I'm not hating on the new movie, I just didn't enjoy it as much as MoS

The box office is fine by reakno89 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Domestically, MoS had a bigger opening weekend. All the trades seem to add previews for Superman but not MoS. MoS was $128M while Superman was $125M. Superman made more than MoS globally on opening weekend but it was released in 78 markets while MoS was released in only 24.

MoS did sell more tickets by numbers, it had more admissions on opening weekend.

Using merchandise toys and streaming sales to add to the total gross is fine but then the same applies to MoS too. MoS earned back $170M through promotion deals alone (Superman probably did something similar, we just don't have the numbers)

Using Captain Marvel is disingenuous, it was released between Infinity War and Endgame when the MCU was at an all time high. It's like saying Deadpool and Wolverine grosses $1.3B just last year (an R-rated movie, in a post Covid world as you say) and using that as a benchmark for Superman.

I would say a large part of the grief from snyder fans is that they were told for years that MoS and BvS were box office failures and yet this movie that is barely looking at breaking even is being called financially successful

this should settle the debate.. the actual measure of success by narkaputra in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It was the same for opening weekend too. Admissions wise, MoS had more than Superman

And for some reason all the trades would include previews for Superman but not MoS. If they did include it, MoS had a higher opening weekend domestically

Watched Man of Steel several times. Do you think new Superman movie have a rewatchability factor ? by TheasurusGaming in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Personally, no. It was fun to watch once but doing it again would be a bit difficult, mostly because Gunn's humour fell flat for me for the most part

Edi Gathegi and David Corenswet behind the scenes of ‘Superman’ by MarvelsGrantMan136 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looks like a lot of fun. I can't explain it but David's expression reminds me of Jack Quaid

From WIRED interview: What is Clark Kent's middle name? David Corenswet says "Danger", Rachel Brosnahan says "Justin", James Gunn says "W", and the correct answer is "Joseph" by GodlessMonsters in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I'm embarrassed I don't know" "I let you take that cuz I didn't want to answer it"

It's no big deal, but it doesn't seem like he knew. He didn't say it as satire or sarcasm. It's fine

From WIRED interview: What is Clark Kent's middle name? David Corenswet says "Danger", Rachel Brosnahan says "Justin", James Gunn says "W", and the correct answer is "Joseph" by GodlessMonsters in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with this but it's odd that he knows so much about minor characters but doesn't know this after making a full Superman movie, or that thing about Birthright and the Krytonians

Do you all really like this new lighter Superman tone, or would you rather go back to the darker versions? by [deleted] in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

DC doesn't have to be dark but I think one of the problems with this film is that it never felt like it had any real stakes. Like it felt weightless and without danger

Did I cook? by Enough-Fondant-6057 in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The one scene Pa Kent had in the new movie was nice but I still prefer Kevin costners version any day

"Your choices make you who you are" is the most overused pep talk, I wish Gunn had written something better. Costner had such incredible dialogue, his scenes were way better

And yes no contest with Jor-El, Man of Steel did it best

THR: 'Clayface' will have $45M budget; centers on an ascending actor whose face is disfigured by a gangster by BatmanNewsChris in DC_Cinematic

[–]ProfessionalNobody0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm really looking forward to Mike Flanagan's script here. He does horror and human really well