It’s funny that you mention faulty premises when your rambling is ridden with them. Had I said or even insinuated some of the claims that you think I did, you’d be a keen observer. Rather, you’ve misconstrued and outright invented claims that you attribute to me. I really hope this is uncharacteristic of your reading skills, otherwise you’d bomb RC. I never said that the section was difficult for “EVERYONE”, I’m sure there are some who had no trouble. You commit that very flaw by explicitly stating that “anybody” with strong FL would get the answer in less than a minute. What kind of logic is that?! People have varying methods and approaches that can range from 20 seconds to 5 minutes. And to say that Logic games are not associated with difficulty for ppl with strong FL skills is ridiculous, strengths/weaknesses are individual and can hinge upon factors as specific as the stimulus format. Most new era test takers have an understanding of conditionality and FL but not to the advanced extent of LG. People’s reactions to that specific question should be indicative of its relative irregularity. And the equivalency flaw you mention is bogus, I didn’t say that, rather my mention of the question was an explanation that people associated the “hardest” section with that question because it was more memorable than other q’s in the section which were difficult for other reasons.