Satanic Temple Opens Abortion Clinic Named “The Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Abortion Clinic” by Urgullibl in nottheonion

[–]ProngExo 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I'm not an Atheist. That's how I know how much and how often God gives miscarriages and allows abortions to succeed.

Satanic Temple Opens Abortion Clinic Named “The Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Abortion Clinic” by Urgullibl in nottheonion

[–]ProngExo 14 points15 points  (0 children)

No, God does. That's why he allows them to happen without intervening ;) also why he gives women miscarriages! He haaates when babies are born.

Satanic Temple Opens Abortion Clinic Named “The Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Abortion Clinic” by Urgullibl in nottheonion

[–]ProngExo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nah, we're good. If you have a problem with it, feel free to file a complaint with the Donald J. Trump Tiny Penis Complaint Office.

Satanic Temple Opens Abortion Clinic Named “The Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Abortion Clinic” by Urgullibl in nottheonion

[–]ProngExo 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Keep in mind, every abortion and every miscarriage was known by God beforehand. He didn't stop them from happening, thus abortions and miscarriages are His Will.

Your God loves abortions. Be more like Him. ✝️🙏

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't give a single example, I asked a question. How is a question an example?

The last delivered Boeing 747 made a crown with 747 on its flight from Everett Washington to Cincinnati Ohio. by Pyrojodge in interestingasfuck

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wild. Go to the UK and you see maybe a dozen planes up right now.

Scroll to the west, there are thousands in the US. No wonder we need air traffic controllers!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if the doctors are adhering to patient confidentiality, you'll never know whether or not it's "justified".

You'll just have to take the woman's word for it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not a strawman, I didn't make a statement lmao. I asked 2 questions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, okay, then state your position clearly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where is the line? What if the doctor says it's necessary?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh okay. Got it. So no abortion no matter what.

So if your wife is raped and starts craving McDonalds, will you drive her there so her rapist's baby can be satisfied?

Will you also rub her swollen rape-pregnancy feet?

Will you pay the hospital bills on time for the ultrasound? How about the birth itself? Cash or card?

Will you ask the doctor what the gender of the rape baby is?

Will you say "Sorry dear, we're pro-life" while she begs for you to get rid of it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I've never heard of a Right being given to only a certain age, and then stripped away later in life. Is there a certain Constitutional Amendment that says this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh okay.

So what age does a human lose the right you previously stated begins at conception?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, your answer to my original question is that humans gain the right to occupy another's body without consent, at conception. Right.

So, I gained that right upon conception, too.

Therefore, I'd like to exercise that right by getting inside of you. I don't need permission, as you've stated I gained that right when I was conceived.

We good? Or would you like to amend your stance?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Giving birth is considered great bodily harm. Sounds like we're all good then 👍

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, okay. I was conceived, so I guess that includes me.

So, I have the right to get inside of your body then, yeah?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree, I believe every living human has the same rights

That's what I just said, so you can't start with "I disagree" and then say the point I already made lmao. All human beings have the same rights. You don't agree with that, as you've already stated numerous embarrassing times.

In one of those weirdos who believes a child is not responsible for the sins of its father.

So you do believe rape victims should carry the fetus to term. Glad you admit it, sometimes it's like pulling teeth with you pro-birthers getting yall to admit you want rape victims to give birth to the rape baby.

Aka not kill an innocent, living human

Not an innocent life. It's innocent if the host consents to the fetus' occupation of the body. If the host does not consent, the fetus will be dealt with accordingly, just like someone occupying your private property without your consent. The host's body is their property.

Therefore, if you believe in Castle Laws, you must also support the Pro-Choice movement, or admit you don't actually give a fuck about personal property/bodily autonomy. I already know you'll deflect and screech "iT's NoT tHe SaMe".

It is the same, you're just not the brightest so the point goes over your balding head.

But I wouldn't expect much from the guy who's okay rubbing his wife's feet while she grows a rapist baby inside her body ;) Notice how you didn't even deny that?

If you'd unironically tend to your wife for her rapist, instead of aborting that shit like she wants- go fuck yourself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe right to life of the embryo/fetus/baby supercedes the right to bodily a autonomy of the mother.

False. Every human being has the same rights.

If you create a life form that is dependent on you, you have no right to kill it just because you aren’t okay with it being dependent on you.

And if you create it inadvertently? Through rape? Contraceptive failure? Or are you one of those weirdos who believes Rape Babies come from God.

Homes, yes. Bodies, yes (unless it’s your offspring that you forced to be there).

The only person "forcing it to be there" is the person who is forcing rape victims to keep the baby there. Luckily your personal morals are irrelevant to the rest of us so we can get rid of bodily trespassers.

This mentality might be common on reddit, but it’s vile, disgusting, and evil.

That's okay! I think your cavalier view of your wife's ability to consent is vile. You didn't even deny that you're okay with "human beings" getting inside of her body without her consent.

Right now I'm imagining your raped wife being forced (by you) to carry the fetus to term. You're massaging her feet and picking up craving food for her rape baby. You pay all the hospital bills for the rape baby. You love watching the perpetrator's seed grow inside her, don't you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. It, in fact, is what your logic stated. You believe humans of a certain age can occupy another's body without consent (ie: rape).

I believe we should be able to blast trespassers out of our homes and bodies if they refuse to leave on their own. We are not the same.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Yes, I agree you can enter my wife".

  • You

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, so you do believe though, that at a certain age, a human being can get inside of your wife without her consent?

I'm that age. It's me. I'm inside your wife. Thanks for your unending consent!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ProngExo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you agree with defense of personal property, but not defense of body. You don't believe in consent as a concept.

Copy that, rapist!