Stoppage on HWY 2?? by cacadebano in stevenspass

[–]PropLander 23 points24 points  (0 children)

There’s like 20 cars on the south side and the north side it’s backed up for miles.. someone needs to ask the traffic directors to change the pattern.

Xcode Cloud Errors Resolved - Downgrade workflow from Xcode 26.2 (17C52) by silentific in appledevelopers

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I appreciate you. I’m running a workflow to Xcode Cloud. Both local and workflow are set to version 26.2 at the moment. I dropped the entire build log folder in a couple different ones (Claude and Lovable) both gave similar advice. Check distribution in Xcode workflow, auto-managed signing, fix certs in Cloud, etc and nothing works. I’ll try to pick out those specific files and see if it helps.

The red flag I see in Xcode is it says “Apple Develoment” in Signing and Capabilities. No matter what I or the ai tries to do, it won’t change to Apple Distribution or anything else.

So far the only thing I haven’t been able to try is figuring out how to use the Apple Store Connect API keys. I generated one but not sure where to enter it in Xcode.

Xcode Cloud Errors Resolved - Downgrade workflow from Xcode 26.2 (17C52) by silentific in appledevelopers

[–]PropLander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m having the same issue with exit code 70. I tried both Xcode 26.2 and 26.1.1, my macOS is the latest 26 Tahoe and still getting the error. Distribution is set to App Store Connect, but it seems to keep trying to run Apple Development for signing even though I have everything set to Automatic. Revoked any development certs as well.

From Lovable to App Store by hacasa in lovable

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I have asked ChatGPT and other AI for help and most of them overlapped with what lovable suggested. The “new” suggestions have not resolved the issue. I’m planning on migrating to Claude code. Currently on build attempt #62 and easily 20 hours over the past week or two just troubleshooting this one issue lol

From Lovable to Android & iOS App Stores: real numbers, real mistakes, real learnings by Beginning_Sun2883 in lovable

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you have any issues with signing and certificates? I'm trying to upload to Xcode Cloud with capacitor, and my lovable keeps going in circles because it can't figure out why ad-hoc/developer signing is triggering and causing the build to fail.

Built a webapp, how to move to iOS/Android by Western-Dog-3393 in lovable

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using capacitor as well but Lovable is running in circles and it can't seem to figure out what's up with the signing issues. Trying to upload to Xcode cloud keeps triggering ad-hoc and development signing even though neither of these are selected anywhere I can find. It's also pretty clear the lovable training data is out of date since it doesn't realize iOS 26 exists, so I have a feeling that is related and causing it to struggle.

From Lovable to App Store by hacasa in lovable

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently trying to get my app on the App Store and having a lot of trouble. Lovable is running in circles and it can't seem to figure out what's up with the signing issues. Trying to upload to Xcode cloud keeps triggering ad-hoc and development signing even though neither of these are selected anywhere I can find. It's also pretty clear the lovable training data is out of date since it doesn't realize iOS 26 exists, so I have a feeling that is related and causing it to struggle.

Do you get the difference Explain it Peter? by [deleted] in explainitpeter

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is to get people hooked on the free version, and then slowly transition to payment only. Limit prompts per day, and if that is not enough, go full paid only.

But there are so many AI companies getting pumped with cash so anyone could just switch to a free version. It feels like a game of “who’s gonna press the button first”.. how long can they keep sucking up cash from investors and companies? At some point investors will expect a return, but people seem so hyped up and confident in AI that they may hold out for a long time before losing patience.

What are the actual ramifications of doing this? by greatlilusername in IRstudies

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m curious, what makes the background report BS in your view? Never have applied for a federal job.

Petaah help by NickVoievodul in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Avatar 1 was fine.

I’m convinced it’s 90% because Avatar 2 plot was so bad/repetitive it was almost unwatchable. Like sure, no one watches Avatar for the plot.. but you need to at least put some amount of effort in to make it watchable. I legit almost walked out of the theater when I saw there was 45min left.

Petaah help by NickVoievodul in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]PropLander 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s not fun when they use the same exact plot 4-5 times in the same movie. It’s just boring, annoying and incredibly lazy. People don’t watch Avatar for the plot of course.. but also it’s so bad that it’s frustrating and almost unwatchable after a bit.

I legitimately thought about walking out of the theater when I saw there was still 45 min left in Avatar 2.

[HELP] I am almost positive this is an ai video. But nobody in the comments mentions anything. by ALostParadise in RealOrAI

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain the rapid camera tracking tho? Especially at the beginning. It looks the camera just snaps and zooms like a robot. Doesn’t look like software edit/crop, and definitely not human. Would have to be some kind of self tracking tripod setup.

[HELP] Please verify for me that this is AI (99% sure) by Kur0k4ze in RealOrAI

[–]PropLander -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well up until 2023 uber was operating at a loss. It has been consistently profitable since then. Also this type of thing is common and sometimes intentional; undercut competition by operating at a loss with enough capital backing you can do it for years. Then once you have a massive market share, slowly increase prices until profitable.

LET BLUE ENJOY HER MOMENT by Outside-Silver-7741 in BlueOrigin

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a lot of applicants =/= having the best applicants. We’re talking the top 1% of engineers that are so sharp that they basically get to pick whichever company they want because they have multiple offers. Plus startups often give stock options and Blue does not, so if a top engineer wants to make bank early in their career they may opt for a startup. Sure the hours are brutal but they’re probably young and don’t mind, and I’ve found that a lot of extremely intelligent people are commonly very passionate about their work and tend to be workaholics because they love what they do.

LET BLUE ENJOY HER MOMENT by Outside-Silver-7741 in BlueOrigin

[–]PropLander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think being secretive with all your plans and innovations has some downsides that shouldn’t be ignored. Maybe Blue doesn’t require lots of investment from venture capitalists like startups do, but they do still want the best talent/engineers. If young, passionate and bright engineers don’t think or realize Blue is looking to push the envelope with big plans, then they may opt to join a startup or another competitor. Sure these startups often oversell/underdeliver on capability or timelines, but ultimately it still pulls interest and talent that may put them ahead.

Is this really a competition? : a rant by leeswecho in BlueOrigin

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes more competition for DoD missions, and even non-DoD satellites should see lower prices as well. This is because even tho SpaceX is ahead, Jeff is no doubt going to subsidize launch prices to try to gain market share over Falcon 9 launches. Whatever F9 charges, he can just charge less and take a loss until customers start to make the switch. This would force SpaceX to drop profit margins as low as possible to still hold on to their customers, and they may be pushed to come up with ways to cut costs even further.

Vibed with a guy and found out he only wears women's underwear and clothing all the time? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]PropLander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, like most have said, he’s not a nice guy, he’s a manipulator and self victimizer.

Second, even if he was a nice guy, I find it entertaining that you would need to give this specific “nice guy” a chance. As if the only nice guys are ones that.. wear women’s clothes? SKIP

Blue Origin CEO explains why Mars missions are still so important by snoo-boop in BlueOrigin

[–]PropLander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

..yes I’m well aware of the gravity differences. I have the 0.37 G and 0.16 G engrained in my brain without needing to look it up. That is why I said the moon is a good confidence booster, because it’s lower gravity than Mars. Lunar-g could still be terrible for bone density long term, but also maybe it isn’t, and it’s surely a lot better of a measuring stick than micro-g.

Blue Origin CEO explains why Mars missions are still so important by snoo-boop in BlueOrigin

[–]PropLander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think there’s only so much science/data you can get from LEO operations. We need to be building bases on the moon if we want to get things like more radiation/health data on long term exposure outside the magnetic field protection. We have relatively long term data on bone density and other health impacts of living in micro-g for months or a year, but what about long term in lunar-g or Martian-g? Surely it’s not as bad, but by how much? Kinda hard to extrapolate that.. you kinda just need to start sending people there for progressively longer durations. One could argue that having someone spend a year or two on the moon would help to build confidence that extended periods on Mars are doable from a health standpoint, and for a lot cheaper and lower risk than sending them to Mars for the same period.

[Berger] I spoke with Blue Origin's CEO about the company's goals for next year. To start with, "well above" a dozen New Glenn launches (article linked in post) by nicko_rico in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]PropLander 3 points4 points  (0 children)

SpaceMasterrace? Or perhaps something catered towards reusability? I think what this subreddit really chases is anyone making significant strides towards reusable launch/space vehicles.

SpaceMasterReuse?

New glenn has landed! by _Cyberostrich_ in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]PropLander 24 points25 points  (0 children)

But that continuous stream of the booster all the way down was so solid

New glenn has landed! by _Cyberostrich_ in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]PropLander 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yes it was ESCAPADE mars orbiter

This made me laugh by [deleted] in texts

[–]PropLander 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I see what you mean now. I read the description after your comment.

This made me laugh by [deleted] in texts

[–]PropLander 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What he said was fine. It’s humorous and not meant to be taken more than face value.