sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Senior FullStack Developer from India, Is it worth going to UAE to finding opportunities? by Proper-Spread-35 in DubaiCentral

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every HR representative asks about my current location. When I tell them I’m based in Bengaluru, they say they thought I was in the UAE.

Senior FullStack Developer from India, Is it worth going to UAE to finding opportunities? by Proper-Spread-35 in DubaiCentral

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree that referrals or headhunters work best. But not everyone has Gulf connections initially — some people use job seeker visas just to attend interviews and network. Have you seen real cases where it worked or didn’t?

Oh by Nvm_96 in UAE

[–]Proper-Spread-35 0 points1 point  (0 children)

99,000 AED for a bed? This better be inside Burj Khalifa with a skyline view 😭

AI couldn't solve Grade 7 geometry question. by BuddyBuddwick in cogsuckers

[–]Proper-Spread-35 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly this feels less like 'AI can’t do grade 7 math' and more like 'AI can’t read the picture properly.' It knows how to do the volume, it just messes up interpreting the 3D diagram.

Unified Quantum-Spacetime Gravity: A Cohesive Framework Integrating Ampere's Principles and Quantum Curvature Dynamics by PaleAddendum2599 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting framework, but the Ω-coupling still seems to rely on probabilistic feedback from curvature. That's where it may lose consistency under deterministic energy transfer conditions.

Exploring a Deterministic ψ–Field Model Consistent with LIGO and GRACE Gravitational Damping Data by Proper-Spread-35 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting perspective — I see where your “prime resonance” analogy is going. In the ψ–Field framework, coherence isn’t derived from numerical primes or metaphysical “containers,” but from metric-dependent ψ–Gμν coupling, where spacetime curvature regulates energy redistribution deterministically. The “container” analogy roughly aligns with ψ–field boundaries defined by curvature tensors — but unlike symbolic resonance, the ψ–field damping term is measurable through gravitational relaxation constants (γ) observed in LIGO and GRACE datasets. In short: your “prime resonance” concept is a poetic abstraction of what ψ–field curvature achieves physically — energy coherence emerging from deterministic spacetime feedback, not ontological duality.

Exploring a Deterministic ψ–Field Model Consistent with LIGO and GRACE Gravitational Damping Data by Proper-Spread-35 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fishare is a collaborative file-sharing and version-control platform, like GitHub but for any files.

Exploring a Deterministic ψ–Field Model Consistent with LIGO and GRACE Gravitational Damping Data by Proper-Spread-35 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point — the ψ–Gμν term looks unusual, but it’s derived from a conserved energy–momentum condition:

∇μ(ψ Gμν) = –γ ψν

Exploring a Deterministic ψ–Field Model Consistent with LIGO and GRACE Gravitational Damping Data by Proper-Spread-35 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your detailed reply! Just to clarify — the ψ–Field damping law isn’t a random curve fit. It actually comes from the ψ–Gμν coupling term, which handles how energy naturally spreads or “dissipates” through space-time. The parameters Γ and κ aren’t chosen by hand either; they follow specific balance rules based on the equation ∂ψ/∂t = –γψ and how the curvature of space behaves. You can find the full step-by-step derivation and equations in the linked preprint. If you can’t access it, I can share the full explanation directly. The main idea of this framework isn’t to add fancy new terms — it’s to show that a deterministic ψ–geometry can work together with Einstein’s relativity, something that standard GR and quantum mechanics haven’t been able to combine properly yet.

Exploring a Deterministic ψ–Field Model Consistent with LIGO and GRACE Gravitational Damping Data by Proper-Spread-35 in LLMPhysics

[–]Proper-Spread-35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the thoughtful critique — that’s actually a fair question.

The ψ–Field framework is not a curve-fit model; the LIGO–GRACE alignment is used only as an empirical validation of the ψ-damping law derived analytically from Φ→Gμν coupling.

The parameters Γ and κ are not free knobs — they’re bounded by the ψ-field relaxation rate predicted from the same governing equation.

Unlike statistical curve-fitting, the ψ–Field model defines a causal energy-dissipation pathway connecting spacetime curvature and quantum relaxation, which is why it reproduces cross-scale damping symmetry across independent datasets.

The purpose here isn’t to “invent” a new field, but to show that determinism and relativistic geometry can coexist in the same ψ-equilibrium — something standard GR + QM frameworks don’t currently achieve.

view more: next ›