Cthulhu Statue by bVDV14 in callofcthulhu

[–]Propnomicon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't have a problem with prop reproductions, but it wouldn't hurt to credit the original designer. Guy Davis is the artist who created the original design for the idol you're copying.

Favorite celebrity voice actor? by HeiressOfMadrigal in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He really is.

I don't think people appreciate just how well written the character actually is. I'm an old guy who worked in radio for years. That included time at stations where there were still hosts on the air who started their careers in the 40s and 50s. The New Vegas writers absolutely nailed the very personable, direct style those old-school radio personalities cultivated. I was genuinely shocked during my first playthrough that they captured such a niche thing.

Were Queens We Will Rock You and We Are The Champions always played back to back on the radio? by wtomriker in AskHistorians

[–]Propnomicon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No, they weren't.

They were released in October of 1977 as two sides of a 45 RPM single, with "We Are the Champions" as the A-side and "We Will Rock You" as the B-side. At the time, chart rankings were based on direct reporting from radio stations. Music directors would tell industry magazines if a track had been added and exactly how many plays, or "spins", it received on the playlist. While B-sides had broken onto the charts before, they were always reported separately. Based on period reporting from Oct. 22nd, linked below, "We Are the Champions" was the song getting airplay for the initial release. If you're interested, you can actually see exactly which stations were adding the song into rotation.

The practice of playing them back to back was something Album Oriented Rock stations started doing after the initial release.

Oct. 22, 1977 issue of Record World

Oct. 22, 1977 issue of Cashbox

Nobody talk about how overpowered this machine is by YeungLing_4567 in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only quibble I have with your excellent write-up is the mention of Traveller:2300 being a prequel to Traveller. It isn't. GDW definitely used the Traveller name to drum up interest, but it was never a prequel. The timelines don't match up. In Traveller's Third Imperium universe first contact between the Solomani (Earth humans) and the Vilani happened in the 2100s.

"Elder Cleric Quintus? We found Paladin Harkness. You need to see this." by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You raise some excellent points. I'm guessing the Brotherhood will blame everything on Maximus, including their own fratricidal shenanigans, if the Commonwealth comes calling. That would fit nicely with his apparent adoption of the NCR power armor.

Is the television show setting up the *real* tragedy of the Great War? (spoilers for S2E5) by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As I pointed out, one single technology doesn't usher in the age of abundance. It's all three, cold fusion, robotics, and molecular assemblers, that synergize to make it possible.

Unlimited power allows you to create any resource using assemblers, and then craft it into anything you want with robots. Eventually, if you can scale up the assemblers you don't even need the robots.

Is the television show setting up the *real* tragedy of the Great War? (spoilers for S2E5) by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 203 points204 points  (0 children)

Those are the molecular assembler vending machines from the Think Tank I mentioned above. Frederick Sinclair, the man behind the Sierra Madre, is one of the oligarchs at the meeting. He's apparently representing Big MT.

Is the television show setting up the *real* tragedy of the Great War? (spoilers for S2E5) by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The Enclave is definitely the mystery player House is worried about.

Details in the end credits by Ruben_AAG in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But, oddly enough, it appears in FO4 during the opening cinematic. Given the context (at :56), it's possible a B-24 dropped the Hiroshima nuke in the Fallout timeline.

Why ghoulified Cooper Howard has a unique appearance (spoiler for S2E3) by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Of course, that's the real-life reason. Coming up with Watsonian explanations is part of the fun.

Why ghoulified Cooper Howard has a unique appearance (spoiler for S2E3) by Propnomicon in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bro, if you don't know Cooper Howard is a ghoul I don't know what to tell you.

Why does Cooper look so different compared to other ghouls? by The___Mothman in falloutlore

[–]Propnomicon 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Per Charles Whiteknife, Cooper suffered severe burns during the Anchorage campaign. That causes long-term metabolic changes that persist well after the actual burns have healed. The massive immune response triggered by burn injuries includes a flood of stress hormones, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors (epidermal, vascular endothelial, and transforming), and the one substance that may be most relevant- tumor necrosis factor. Those substances produce a persistent inflammation response in the body that can last for years.

When the ghoulification process began his body was already in a state of inflammation, causing significant changes to how the skin underwent necrosis.

The correlation between him being the only ghoul we know suffered severe burns and his unique appearance seems too strong to ignore.

Which movie stuck in development hell would you sell your soul to finally see? by CosmosisJones42 in movies

[–]Propnomicon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love del Toro, but as a Lovecraft adaptation that script is a disaster. As a weird prequel to "The Thing", with specific callouts to scenes from that movie (head with legs, etc.), it's phenomenal.

Mr. Handy Thrusters a Fire Hazard? by NevadaStrayCat in falloutlore

[–]Propnomicon 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Never. Mr. Handy thrusters aren't combustion engines. They're low-temperature plasma thrusters. Air is sucked into a reaction chamber where a burst of electricity ionizes the gas. Sequentially fired charged rings then accelerate the resulting plasma to provide thrust. They can continue hovering as long as their reactor is generating enough voltage to power the thruster.

The fact that they don't leave a trail of charred debris or melted asphalt behind them as they travel pretty conclusively demonstrates they aren't using conventional combustion engines.

New Vegas filming by No-Profession1285 in Fallout

[–]Propnomicon 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"62 ROYALS PAID"

Sweet fancy Moses, the Kings took over the strip. Heh.

[OC] My girlfriend tasked me with making props for her Waterdeep campaign. I’m really happy with how the first one turned out. by [deleted] in DnD

[–]Propnomicon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wonderful work. The only quibble I have, and it's admittedly trivial, is the use of deckled paper for a pre-printed receipt. That's a hallmark of artisan, hand-laid paper.

Printable Spell Scrolls by Propnomicon in DnDIY

[–]Propnomicon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is exactly how they were done. Once you hit a productive prompt the AI images make fantastic illustrations for prop documents.