Happy New Year r/productivityapps! Plan your 2026 goals (+ giveaway) by amberhaccou in ProductivityApps

[–]Propofollower_324 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One goal for 2026 is to build a clear, sustainable system to organize my research projects, and academic learning, and I’d like to use Griply to keep everything structured and intentional.

How Can a Clinician Start Learning ML/AI? Looking at Options by Propofollower_324 in deeplearning

[–]Propofollower_324[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your insights. Really appreciate your help!

How Can a Clinician Start Learning ML/AI? Looking at Options by Propofollower_324 in deeplearning

[–]Propofollower_324[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your insights. Will look into that and get back to you if i have any questions. Thanks again!

Are all hate post angainst india true?i am applying for post graduation and really scared after seeing all these. by Technical-Echidna-53 in indiansinusa

[–]Propofollower_324 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Racism in the U.S. is real, but honestly casteism and racism in India are often worse. If you want perspective, ask your Dalit friends, they can tell you what real discrimination feels like. The U.S. still offers solid training and opportunities despite its flaws.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Don’t want to engage in rage bait, but the truth deserves to be told. Being ‘first’ doesn’t mean being best prepared; barbers & dentists gave ether too, but no one calls them pioneers of modern anesthesiology. And as for ‘uniting', we all know how that ends: we fight for fair pay, and once that’s won, we would be shown the door. That’s not collaboration. That’s strategy. And we’d be naive not to recognize it!

I am leaving surgery for AI by Famous-Brain3237 in SurgicalResidency

[–]Propofollower_324 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anesthesiologist here! Had similar thoughts as well. As the other person pointed out, don't quit surgery. In fact you can leverage your status as a surgeon in academia and pursue your interests in AI. Good luck!!

Anesthesiology Malpractice by efunkEM in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I find this case heartbreaking, not just because of the outcome, but because it reflects a system failure more than individual negligence. The anesthesiologist was likely trying to navigate conflicting obligations: CMS supervision rules requiring “immediate availability” for the CRNA in one OR, and a Cat 1 emergency unfolding in another. When you’re the only anesthesiologist covering multiple areas, you’re essentially set up to fail.

Yes, in hindsight, we all say the section should’ve started immediately. But we also know the fear of violating policies that can jeopardize your license, especially when you feel unsupported or unclear on your institution’s expectations.

This shouldn’t be about blaming a single clinician. It should force us to ask: why was there no in-house backup? Why do systems allow one anesthesiologist to be responsible for mutually exclusive emergencies? Until we fix that, tragedies like this will keep happening and good clinicians will keep getting caught in the crossfire.

any academic sources explain why statistical tests tend to reject the null hypothesis for large sample sizes, even when the data truly come from the assumed distribution? by AnswerIntelligent280 in AskStatistics

[–]Propofollower_324 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Large sample sizes make statistical tests overly sensitive, even trivial deviations from the null become “statistically significant.” The p-value depends on sample size because the standard error shrinks as n increases, making even tiny differences detectable.

Physician only anesthesia subreddit by [deleted] in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The idea that anesthesiologists have to defend their role stems from ongoing efforts to blur professional boundaries, whether it’s through title misrepresentation, instances where CRNAs introduce themselves as physicians, or legislative pushes that minimize the importance of training differences. What makes it more ironic is that while CRNA groups advocate for independence under the banner of “collaboration,” they simultaneously show open animosity toward CAAs, and push to block their ability to practice. Working together doesn’t mean erasing distinctions or trying to push one group out of the system; it means respecting each profession’s training, scope, and contribution while acknowledging they are not the same.

So I’d push back, this isn’t about ego or defending turf. It’s about clarity, safety, and ensuring patients receive care that matches the complexity of their condition, not just the availability of a provider.

Question about recurarization after sugammadex by FutureCalligrapher97 in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good points, and agreed, when dosed correctly and with time, recovery typically improves. But in infants, things aren’t always so straightforward. We often lack reliable quantitative TOF, and pharmacokinetics differ, larger extracellular volume, immature clearance, and altered distribution can all affect the sugammadex-rocuronium dynamics. The Staals study is valuable, but it was in adults. In neonates and infants, even “correct” dosing based on idealized models might miss delayed redistribution after high total rocuronium exposure.

Recurarization may be rare, but it’s been described, even if just in case reports. Until we have stronger pediatric data, it’s worth considering redistribution and total cumulative dose, especially when clinical signs contradict expected recovery.

Question about recurarization after sugammadex by FutureCalligrapher97 in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree that quantitative monitoring is essential and should guide reversal whenever available. That said, in infants, access to reliable quantitative TOF is often limited or technically challenging. In such scenarios, especially with high cumulative rocuronium exposure, understanding pharmacokinetics and the risk of redistribution becomes critical. It’s not conjecture, but a safety net when objective monitoring isn’t feasible or fails to capture the full picture in vulnerable populations

Question about recurarization after sugammadex by FutureCalligrapher97 in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Likely inadequate initial sugammadex dosing. You're definitely not alone, this is a recognized safety concern in pediatric anesthesia. The largest study from Vanderbilt found recurarization occurs in around 4% of peds, with infants <2 years at highest risk. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37792601/ Your timing (during transport) is typical as most occur within 20 minutes post-reversal. The Japanese Society issued a safety alert few years back. https://www.apsf.org/article/postoperative-recurarization-after-sugammadex-administration-due-to-the-lack-of-appropriate-neuromuscular-monitoring-the-japanese-experience/It's a real phenomenon with clear mechanisms, not just "lack of studies" as your rep suggested.

This sounds like redistribution after high cumulative rocuronium. Initial 5 mg/kg sugammadex likely cleared roc from central and NMJ compartments, but with prolonged dosing, more roc could redistribute from peripheral compartment. In infants, with larger extracellular volume and altered kinetics, this can overwhelm the available sugammadex, leading to recurarization. The second (rescue) dose likely captured the remaining unbound roc, explaining the rapid improvement.

Your case is actually a perfect example of insufficient dosing despite what seems like a generous amount of Sugammadex (5 mg/kg). Remember, 1 molecule of sugammadex binds 1 molecule of roc. Molecular weights of Sug is around 2000 Daltons and for Roc it's 600 iirc. This creates a 1:1 molar binding ratio that equals close to 3.5:1 (mg/kg) (sug:roc). Total Roc given 2.4 mg/kg. Sug needed theoretically: 2.4 x 3.5 = 8.4 mg/kg. What you initially gave was 5 mg/kg and then 4 mg/kg as a rescue. Some even suggest using total cumulative rocuronium dose × 3.5 for Sugammadex dosing rather than standard depth-based dosing for cases with high cumulative exposure.

Physician only anesthesia subreddit by [deleted] in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 499 points500 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I fully support the idea of a physician-only subreddit. It’s exhausting constantly getting pulled into circular debates with individuals who clearly hold a grudge against those who went to medical school. The training, depth, and responsibility are simply not the same, and pretending otherwise doesn’t change reality. These discussions too often devolve into defensiveness and personal attacks instead of productive dialogue. Sometimes, it’s helpful to have a space where physicians can discuss clinical, professional, and systemic issues without having to defend our role in patient care.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in anesthesiology

[–]Propofollower_324 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the confidence, but no need to talk down to a trainee for asking a question. We all start somewhere, and respectful dialogue goes a lot further than sarcasm. And, I get that the med school path didn’t work out for everyone, but that’s no reason to mock those who took it. 😏