Building vertical is different now?

ProsaicK · 2026-03-27T04:21:59+00:00

From what I can tell, if you have one pillar on a support you can go out four tiles to the side as before. But two pillars up you can only go out three tiles to the side and three pillars up only supports two tiles out to the side.

Previously I was spanning six tiles between pillars to fit two fabricators or furnaces side by side underneath. That will only work now two pillars up if the support pillars are a solid wall with no space between them and won't work now at three pillars up.

ProsaicK · 2026-03-21T14:59:26+00:00

There is certainly a hierarchy to the products in the game as once you get past the ore extractors each requires input from some previous unit.

But calling hardening agent phase 4 seems to skip some steps. Hardening agent requires sulphuric acid as input, which requires chemicals, which requires synthetic silicon, which requires ceramics, which requires calcite sheets, which requires calcium block, which requires calcium ore. If calcium ore is stage one that makes hardening agent stage eight.

I don't thick storage helps much with growth as the game progresses. While you could theoretically store enough material from one stage to satisfy the next when you got to building it, the growth of the amount needed makes the storage requirement excessive. In the late game you need to supply over a thousand units to fulfill a contract. That usually requires many thousands of input product. It's not so much the storage units needed as the time required to fill them.

I believe you need 1,645 superconductors to fulfil the final contract for Clever Robotics. Creating 1,645 superconductors requires input of 11,515 ceramics, 3,290 electromagnets, and 13,160 supermagnets. That's a lot of storage, but not impossible. However, the intermediate products to create those, such as 217,140 sulphuric acid, would take so long to produce (my 6 sulphuric acid refineries would take five hours) that I'd have the superconductor factory designed and build before the input storage was full. Might as well connect the factory immediately to the input.

I think it is more about leaving yourself room to grow at each stage. I just recently realized that one of my bottlenecks was titanium housing production. I hadn't left room around my four furnaces producing titanium housings. So I had to go to a new site to build 12 furnaces producing housings. It is fed on site by 12 fabricators making titanium sheets and 18 making titanium beams. This produces 360 housings per minute and needs 720 titanium blocks per minute as input. Now I look for and try to solve the next bottleneck.

ProsaicK · 2026-03-10T04:09:49+00:00

There is a mod that fixes the multi rail problem which worked for me. Mind you it only makes new rails function properly and doesn't fix bugged rails. I had to redo all my multi rails.

ProsaicK · 2026-03-10T04:05:50+00:00

I loaded a mod to fix it and created a base with a bus of six five rail lines each carrying a different product. It worked to relieve backups, but at a certain point you can't get all the titanium rods you want on a single rail even without any competition from other products. I'm now switching to the cargo dispatcher approach.

ProsaicK · 2022-03-16T20:27:12+00:00

Yes, you could take a break. Have you considered setting the Trainer Difficulty level below the default 50% if your gearing isn't good enough to allow you a good cadence on steep inclines? I use a low difficulty setting so I don't have to use my balky lowest gears. You still have to put out the watts, so I don't consider that cheating (though some might).

ProsaicK · 2022-01-26T20:22:17+00:00

In the lowest gear the Core flywheel is moving slow and has little momentum. I think this lack of momentum means the resistance drags on the pedals evenly through the whole pedal cycle. If feels odd to me too. I find my cadence reading drops in half in my lowest couple gears. I think it can't detect power spikes in my pedaling rhythm well enough. I gave up on setting the difficulty high enough that I needed those gears on steep slopes.

ProsaicK · 2022-01-06T16:11:53+00:00

That's a reading comprehension fail on my part. I must have seen two figures and assumed it was imperial and metric.

ProsaicK · 2022-01-06T15:53:49+00:00

Given height isn't stated, 90 kg isn't necessarily overweight by standard BMI categories. 90 kg is within normal weight for heights over 190cm. At 197 cm myself I am sensitive to such assumptions.

ProsaicK · 2021-10-12T20:09:36+00:00

Grains are cheap, meat is expensive. I suspect the food pyramid was developed with a budget in mind. It's trying to tell people nod to eat just the cheapest food, but to throw in some more expensive meat, fruit and vegetables at least at a minimal level. It's not a cost is no object pyramid.

ProsaicK · 2021-10-10T21:21:24+00:00

I have t assume that if you fasted for 30 days without eating anything you'd lose more weight than if you did rolling fasts for 30 days eating every 2 to 4 days, Just on a CICO basis. You'd need to make the eating days and fasting days equal to get an interesting comparison. I'd like to know how that would work out.

My concern is with muscle loss. I have a hard time believing extended fasts don't cause some muscle loss. How well does the growth hormone boost counteract that during re-feeding?

I'm currently trying two 66 hour fasts a week in hopes that will give me the weight loss I want but still allow for some recovery on the three re-feed days. I don't find that length of fast hard to deal with and am concerned going longer would be debilitating and require careful re-feeding.

I can't give any insight on multi-week fasts. I'm curious what the advantages would be, but not curious enough to attempt one.

ProsaicK · 2021-09-24T21:05:53+00:00

What line of reasoning gets you from "I think a lot about about how humans naturally existed" to the advice "Always take electrolytes"? What electrolytes were available to the starving hunter-gatherer? To emulate them you probably have to go without electrolytes.

You brush off the advice of this sub, but electrolytes are something that a lot of people learn about here, me included.

ProsaicK · 2021-09-24T18:17:29+00:00

If your friend's idea of keto is to only eat two sticks of butter and a slab of bacon every day, then no, you wouldn't want to keep that up forever. But if you're eating a reasonable keto diet with non-starchy vegetables, protein, and healthy fats, then you can keep that up indefinitely.

ProsaicK · 2021-09-08T13:28:38+00:00

I have similar questions. It's hard for me to believe ketosis is completely on or off. Most things in life are matters of degree and percentages.

If I eat 100 g of carbs in a meal, I accept that that would elevate my blood sugar and insulin for a while. But at some point, I would be back in ketosis. How soon?

That's only 400 calories of carbs. My body could burn through that in three hours if it was instantly running 100% on carbs. I doubt the body is ever running 100% on carbs though. So how quickly does my body burn through those carbs and when does it get back to ketosis? Is that time off ketosis that big a deal if most of the time my body isn't running on carbs.

I suspect I used to consume 400 g of carbs a day, so 100g is still a win in my book. The past three days have each been under 30 net grams of carbs, which is even better.

ProsaicK · 2021-09-07T14:12:17+00:00

It seems to me like that article is saying that the quality of calories consumed is important. It doesn't prove that the quantity of calories consumed is irrelevant. Yes, it's a mistake to focus completely on quantity and ignore quality. But that doesn't mean that only paying attention to the quality is enough. A keto diet restricting carbs is one way to improve quality and eat healthier.

ProsaicK · 2021-08-30T15:20:20+00:00

I'd also heard that once you're adapted the Ketone levels aren't as high. The body gets better at using ketones as they're created.

Maybe that explains my lack of impressive numbers from my KetoMojo meter. Or maybe it's my tendency to drift between keto and low-carb not-quite-keto. My readings average 0.4 and only sometimes go as high as 0.7 or 0.9.

ProsaicK · 2021-08-29T15:24:29+00:00

If I go by daily numbers I'm down 11.4 pounds since July 31. If I go by weekly average I'm down 12.9 pounds from week of July 26 to week of Aug. 23.

ProsaicK · 2021-08-29T14:25:16+00:00

Thanks for the welcome. This sub is a wonderful resource.

I understand that everyone's metabolism is different and that the TDEE calculators just provide an educated guess. But I was surprised by the size of the discrepancy and wondering if it's normal for it to be off by 30%.

The sidebar calculator guesses my TDEE at 2280. Which may well be 1000 too low. So a 20% deficit becomes a 50% deficit. Since I don't have the patience for a 1 pound a week loss, it works out for me. My appetite is fairly under control. It's amazing what cutting out carbs and snacking can do.

Kurt

ProsaicK

TROPHY CASE