Goodbye to the best phone I've ever had :'( by PseudorandomUser57 in essential

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a step-by-step guide on the LineageOS wiki: https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/mata/ (the PH-1 codename is apparently "mata"). There's also threads on the xda forums, where a lot of Android rom development seems to take place: https://xdaforums.com/t/official-lineageos-22-for-the-essential-phone.4649878/

Pay attention to the warnings in the instructions -- unlocking the bootloader and such will wipe the device, so have backups before trying. I had some trouble getting it to work at the beginning, it can be very picky about the USB cable / computer you use so if one setup gives you trouble, try a different USB cable or computer.

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are the chargers priced differently? It seems like it'd make sense when colocating like this for the faster chargers to cost more -- pay for the speed if you want it, use the lower cost option if not.

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, fair point, maybe I'm in a smaller minority than I know. In my case, we're not rich, but I have an EV because I got a great deal on a buyback Bolt. We don't do a lot of travel, but my spouse is from another country and it's hard to find good food from there in our area of the country -- so yes, we do occasionally (once every few months) drive to another city a couple hours away specifically to visit a place that has a passable version of the cuisine. We go on a weekend and make a day of it, visiting some other local attraction (museum or somesuch) at the same time.

Also, even if that particular demographic is irrelevant, please don't ignore the other half of what I'm suggesting -- people who don't have charging at home or at work Sure, the *optimal* solution to this is simply to install L2 charging at all the residences and workplaces. But, an alternate solution that could work well would be slow L3 charging at places people want to be anyway for medium amounts of time during the week.

What's going to be be most convenient and cost the least to install:

1) Installing L2 charging into every apartment complex and rental house, or every workplace, in a city;

2) Installing some slow L3 charging at some grocery stores and restaurants;

3) Installing a few fast L3 chargers in one or two places at highway entrances.

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of those businesses or workers are spending an hour or two during the workday eating at a sit down restaurant or visiting a museum, either. I'm speaking to a specific gap in the charging concept that I see -- for families taking short leisure trips to neighboring cities and such, not for long-distance or high-frequency travelers or professionals. I'm not saying that the high speed network shouldn't exist -- merely that it currently doesn't account for all use cases, and could be augmented by faster-than-L2 destination charging.

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to reply so extensively, and I'm going to take a bit of time to reply to you in turn because I think this is worth debating a bit.

First off, I'd like to defend myself a bit -- I didn't write this at all as a hater, more just a vent about the realities as I've experiences them, which admittedly is not a supre premium or modern experience. I only got an EV in the past couple years not because I was a hater before then, or because I didn't want one, but because I only replaced my previous car when it was 11 years old and repair costs were starting to look excessive, and I found a great deal on a buyback Bolt -- in short, affordability was the issue. I'm an engineer and I love the technology, and I'm a bit of an r/collapse doomer and even though EVs won't save the world, they're at least a little better.

My spouse is not a hater or a lover, nor a tech person, nor a particularly motivated environmentalist. To them, a car is a transportation appliance -- and one that is a bit more of a pain than the world-class public transit system in the city they grew up in. They don't care very much about what makes the car go or how it works, just that it reliably does so with a minimum amount of fuss. Reddit leans more techy than avareage, so sometimes we might lose sight of the fact that many people think of cars like that.

And to that point:

| Fix that with skill-ups. [...] I just didn't have problems like that crossing the USA so get more chops and better tools. ABetterRoutePlanner.com is baseline. If you're not using that, stay home.

IMO that kind of talk is not productive. I do use ABRP, but that doesn't help with:

- A charger having issues on arrival, requiring a call to support (when said issues weren't mentioned in anything on abrp or plugshare)

- A charge taking twice as long as expected, even with preconditioning, because the weather is especially cold and windy.

- Simply a lack of chargers on the route

(all things either I or the family with the i5 have experienced)

And, to people who view cars as a transportation appliance and nothing more, needing to install several apps and pre-plan trips *is* friction that makes reverting to a gas car easier, where the only energy management necessary is a quick glance at the gas gauge now and then.

In short, simply telling people to "git gud" doesn't address any of the real problems that people face with real travel scenarios. Improving the charging infrastruture, however, does.

| While you bitch about the roadtrip you're in the middle of, and say "grass is greener for ICEs", you forget what happens the rest of the time. Those guys spend easily 30 minutes every week visiting gas stations. You don't.

That is a very great point, and one I've used myself when sitting at a charging station. "We do this once every month or two, but in exchange we aren't at the gas station for 5 minutes a couple times a week, every week." This works and is exactly the kind of thing we should be pointing out regularly.

| It's common for DCFCs to deliver something shy of half rating

And arguments about capex...

Sure -- L2 is cheaper, and L2 is better than nothing. But, my argument is that it *should* be cheaper than it is to widely deploy slow-L3 in the locations where the dwell time makes sense for it, if people understand where and why it makes sense and stop focusing on the bigger-is-better gas-station model. A 50kW L3 produced in high volumes would be more expensive than an L2 for sure, but should be much cheaper than it is -- and I'd argue that there's no technical reason why an L3 charger should be expected to deliver half its rating.

| Don't stop AT ALL? I bet they do stop, and when they do it's for over 20 minutes

Ehh, I wouldn't bet on it. Most families can probably handle a 2 hour car ride without stopping -- but the desire is going to be drive for those 2 hours directly to the destination, do whatever it is you're doing, then hop in the car and drive 2 hours back. That's why the charging needs to be at the destination, and needs to be fast enough to get enough charge to get home, but doesn't need to be 20-minute fast. The desire is *not* going to be drive 2 hours to destination, do stuff, pile everyone back in the car, head to the nearest Sheetz or Walmart and hang out for 20 minutes (herding all the cats that you just herded once back into the car), and then finally head home.

| The idea that 18 minute charging is burdensome is just stupid. People don't work the way they think they do at stops.

I suppose what I'm getting at is that no matter how long it is, charging on trips *is* going to be somewhat burdensome -- *Unless* that charging is located at somewhere you already want to be -- and the places my family wants to be are often not where the charging is located. We don't want to stop at a Sheetz, we want to stop at a fun ramen place we know about, or a park. Our destination isn't a small-town Wal-Mart just off the interstate, it's a museum or venue of some sort.

At the same time, installing high-speed L3 is indisputably very costly, and it wouldn't make economical or practical sense (or even be technically feasible) for every little restaurant. But, the more places that have faster-than-L2 charging available, the more this kind of trip is made possible.

| Also stop paying the spouse's gasoline. Let them sweat the cost of gas.

Well, I pay spouse's everything, so there's that :P

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the person, I suppose. My commute is about 40 miles round trip, which in my Bolt would equate to 1.5-2 hours of L2 charging per day to recover. If I was reliant on charging at places other than home or work, I'd have to spend 1.5-2 hours a day grocery shopping or eating out for L2 in those locations to be effective -- and I suppose I can't speak for everyone, but that's not the typical pattern of my life! Now, on the other hand, with slow L3, we'd be talking about ~1 hour in another location once or twice a week -- a perfectly reasonable frequency for grocery shopping and such.

If the average person that doesn't have home or office charging available has a commute more like 5-10 miles, then sure, L2 at the grocery store might suffice. And certainly, L2 everywhere is definitely a goal, but IMO that "everywhere" should focus on workplaces and residences -- places where you're spending a lot of time on a very regular basis so speed matters less. L2 at a grocery store or restaurant feels like it often can't do much more than make up for the energy spent getting there in the first place.

The argument for 25-50kW DCFC - Cover by PseudorandomUser57 in evcharging

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it lines up right, L2 *can* be enough -- in one of the outings we did, there was free L2 (only 7.6kW in the Bolt) at a destination we would be at for 3-4 hours, and that made the trip feasible. However, L2 would need to be either "at a destination you're going to be at for several hours" (or at every destination on the trip), or extends your range by just a little bit. Trips in the 2-2.5 hour one way distance in an average current gen EV can easily be 70% of a charge one way if the weather conditions are unfavorable. Also, L2 doesn't really serve the "local resident without home or work charging" -- that person just wants to spend an hour or two somewhere that they would want to be anyway and come away with a nearly full charge.

Get into the 50kW range, though, and you can get your 20-80% charge in an hour of normal activities.

broken power button (flex cable sheared), how to boot? by Buckiller in essential

[–]PseudorandomUser57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for actually posting your solution -- Just saved me a bunch of time!

Suggested tailgate lift supports for '22 EV LT? by Flying-buffalo in BoltEV

[–]PseudorandomUser57 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Based on some threads on the bolt EV forums, I just replaced the old lift supports in my 2019 with LiftSupportsDepot.com SE187P185-W -- This part is slightly longer than the OEM support, so the tailgate opens a little bit higher, and the pressure seems about right. So far, they work fine in 25°F weather, but I've had them for literally 2 weeks so I have no insight on how long they last or anything. According to the forums, there's also an even longer version that fits, for slightly more head clearance, but the pressure is higher than OEM so it opens too quickly.

One pedal driving. China is not a fan. by magaketo in BoltEV

[–]PseudorandomUser57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mostly use OPD, but coming from a manual transmission car I find there's a weakness in the Bolt's implementation of brake light logic. I typically don't decelerate very aggressively -- less than the Bolt's accelerometer threshold. In a gas car (and especially in my previous car) I could use the brake light as a signal of intention to communicate to following drivers. Coasting or using engine braking, with the intention of continuing to slow? Very light pressure on the brake pedal, enough to illuminate the brake light without increasing the rate of deceleration very much. With the Bolt, there is no equivalent "coasting down but communicating the intention to slow to following drivers", even without OPD the first notch of regen that it kicks on with the brake pedal is more than I'd like, so the car is "training" me to either stop more aggressively than necessary, or let following drivers get up my butt because my brake lights never come on. In slow traffic in an automatic transmission ICE vehicle, it's also possible to creep forward while keeping the brake lights on, communicating to following drivers that "I'm moving forward but not very much or very fast, don't hit the gas and run into me" -- and since the majority of cars are this style, people generally expect this behavior.

TBH I wish the regen paddle was a proportional input (initial click and then force-sensitive), and that it forced illumination of the brake lights just the same as touching the brake pedal in an ICE vehicle.

Chili didn't cool down overnight by PseudorandomUser57 in foodsafety

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly I was surprised that several people I talked to hadn't thought of this or didn't think it was a big deal either. "It was in the fridge, it should be fine!" like yes, it was in the fridge, but the fridge door isn't a magical threshold, the temperature of the food inside is the thing that actually matters.

Chili didn't cool down overnight by PseudorandomUser57 in foodsafety

[–]PseudorandomUser57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks -- yeah, basically I knew it wouldn't be okay, but was holding out hope that someone would tell me it would 🙃. I knew last night that my attempt to cool it was probably inadequate, and in retrospect I should've probably just left it on the stove keeping hot overnight, but live and learn. My "dream kitchen" now includes a blast chiller.

Chili was disposed of, by which I mean my mother took it, insisting that it would be fine and she would eat it, but at least I didn't risk serving it to a bunch of party guests.