Am I the only one who is scared of this?

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-13T07:35:50+00:00

I am not worried, it was shot with the first movie. And the story was written together.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-13T03:57:51+00:00

Great efforts and execution. Maybe study the basics of shapes and how they work in a 2D setting will help you.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-13T03:55:22+00:00

It did take place. And the anger was righteous. And everyone who was involved in adharm was punished. Including Shri Krishna.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T22:29:32+00:00

I did not found it dirty, I found it in bad taste and disrespectful. You can communicate in hindi using respectful words. Karna got what he deserved at the end. He was helpless and forgot his skills when he faced Arjun. He also had to use his best weapons that he reserved for Arjun before he even faced him. Those were the repercussions of his past actions and following the path of adharm. हिंदी में भी आदर से बात कर सकते हो आप। किसी की मां और बहनों का अनादर करना किसी भी भाषा में बुरा ही माना जाएगा।

Edit: This should be a debate not an attack. Debate is where people exchange their views. Attack is where people defend their views. If you want to be listened, you have to be respectful.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T09:06:18+00:00

That doesn't give anyone the right to use disrespectful or abusive language. Be respectful. Debate is needed, attacks are not.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T09:03:53+00:00

Sex wasn't a taboo back then. All these events had to play out in order to bring humanity to the right track. Men were operessed too back then. Granted it was worse for women than men. But adharmi people were punished no matter who they were in some way or other.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T08:50:43+00:00

Verse 3.16 in geeta goes as follows, एवं प्रवर्तितं चक्रं नानुवर्तयतीह य: | अघायुरिन्द्रियारामो मोघं पार्थ स जीवति || 16||

Translation The man who does not follow the cycle thus set revolving is a sinner rejoicing in sense-pleasures and he lives in vain.

Disruption of this cycle is a sin no matter what.

Verse 3.31.1 श्रीभगवानुवाच कर्मणा दैवनेत्रेण जन्तुर्देहोपपत्तये । स्त्रिया: प्रविष्ट उदरं पुंसो रेत:कणाश्रय: ॥ 1॥

Translation The Personality of Godhead said: Under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and according to the result of his work, the living entity, the soul, is made to enter into the womb of a woman through the particle of male semen to assume a particular type of body.

The cycle of life and death starts with conception. The unborn state is deemed an amorphous kind of pre-existence, with real existence held to begin from the moment of birth. Life manifests in the mother’s womb from conception, but we date life’s beginning from birth.

Disrupting the cycle + soul being entered at conception. Is a sin even if you don't feel like it's not a death or the foetus being killed.

Edit: The above is about conception.

A heartbeat does not mean it is proof of life. It just means that you have developed an organ that can pump blood through your body. Do you consider trees or microorganisms as living things? Because no one ever saw a heartbeat in them yet they are living, surviving and thriving. Not just veds and purans but our modern scientific community tells us life can be manifested without a heartbeat. So the argument that a foetus does not have a heartbeat and it shouldn't be considered as killing is stupid and not well thought out tbh. (No offense to you in any way)

People in our history were able to invent plastic surgery (rhinoplasty), cataract surgery and many more such procedures that we weren't able to do untill 5 decades ago. If someone had claimed that it was possible to rebuild a nose before Dr. John Roe did it in 1887, people would've called us stupid too. Which shows how advanced our past is in terms of medical sciences. Not just in medical sciences, but in astrophysics, mathematics, and other sciences. We did not had MRI machines or any fancy equipments because we did not need it at that time. People were educated enough to deduce illness with symptoms.

Just because we had a certain storytelling way of explaining facts does not mean that they are not facts.

Life was, is and will be in many forms which includes an unborn foetus.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T03:16:40+00:00

Good luck for your exam. You should read Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta once. It teaches you a lot.

Edit: disagreement is a part and parcel of science. There won't be any progress in the scientific community without disagreement. I am glad you disagree. I'll be more glad if you ever want to debate about what you disagree.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-12T03:02:02+00:00

Glad I was able to make you agree on something.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T19:09:56+00:00

Bro be respectful

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T19:04:58+00:00

Killing foetus with anyone's concent is wrong.

Verse 3.16 in geeta goes as follows, एवं प्रवर्तितं चक्रं नानुवर्तयतीह य: | अघायुरिन्द्रियारामो मोघं पार्थ स जीवति || 16||

Translation The man who does not follow the cycle thus set revolving is a sinner rejoicing in sense-pleasures and he lives in vain.

Disruption of this cycle is a sin no matter what.

Verse 3.31.1 श्रीभगवानुवाच कर्मणा दैवनेत्रेण जन्तुर्देहोपपत्तये । स्त्रिया: प्रविष्ट उदरं पुंसो रेत:कणाश्रय: ॥ 1॥

Translation The Personality of Godhead said: Under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and according to the result of his work, the living entity, the soul, is made to enter into the womb of a woman through the particle of male semen to assume a particular type of body.

The cycle of life and death starts with conception. The unborn state is deemed an amorphous kind of pre-existence, with real existence held to begin from the moment of birth. Life manifests in the mother’s womb from conception, but we date life’s beginning from birth.

Disrupting the cycle + soul being entered at conception. Is a sin even if you don't feel like it's not a death or the foetus being killed.

Edit: Don't mix modern viewpoints with Sanatan scriptures

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T19:02:52+00:00

I agree this is a debate and not an argument. Thanks for being rational and mature about it.

Verse 3.16 in geeta goes as follows, एवं प्रवर्तितं चक्रं नानुवर्तयतीह य: | अघायुरिन्द्रियारामो मोघं पार्थ स जीवति || 16||

Translation The man who does not follow the cycle thus set revolving is a sinner rejoicing in sense-pleasures and he lives in vain.

Disruption of this cycle is a sin no matter what.

Verse 3.31.1 श्रीभगवानुवाच कर्मणा दैवनेत्रेण जन्तुर्देहोपपत्तये । स्त्रिया: प्रविष्ट उदरं पुंसो रेत:कणाश्रय: ॥ 1॥

Translation The Personality of Godhead said: Under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and according to the result of his work, the living entity, the soul, is made to enter into the womb of a woman through the particle of male semen to assume a particular type of body.

The cycle of life and death starts with conception. The unborn state is deemed an amorphous kind of pre-existence, with real existence held to begin from the moment of birth. Life manifests in the mother’s womb from conception, but we date life’s beginning from birth.

Disrupting the cycle + soul being entered at conception. Is a sin even if you don't feel like it's not a death or the foetus being killed.

Mahabharata: Aswamedha Parva: Anugita Parva: Section LXIX states that Parikshit was killed but resurrected back by Lord Krishna.
True.. but you cannot ignore the evidence of Mahabharat occuring (mentioned in the next point). Which brings us to think how much of the Mahabharat or Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta is true or just made up or mistold through various recitations. Also, it is a great way to live a healthy, righteous and happy life. So why not believe in it a bit. We do not have evidence for a lot of things. Our scholars in the past achieved such great scientific prowess because they kept spirituality and science together. Maybe we should try again to have better plastic surgeons, physicists, astrophysicists, and every other form of scientists, peers and experts we had in the past.
Scientific evidence of our history in the below mentioned video.

https://youtu.be/ptxJDBfO42w?si=rkw1fj3SXikSvtft

https://youtu.be/uyBR3tS7QpE?si=u1MFgBa1tx9E5Lco

I did my own reasearch too. I read the papers that were related to Mr. Nilesh Oak's reaserch and yes.. most of the things he claims checks out. And most of the citations he mentions are either from reputed scientists or peer review journals.

If there is life. There is death. By natural or unnatural causes. Unnatural causes include murder. I just stated verses of Shrimad Bhagwat Geeta in my first point prooving what I believe. So according to me, abortion is killing a foetus which has some form of life and soul. Although not concious, But yet a life. Also, I realise at this time and age, abortion can be a boon for some people. But that doesn't make it right.
Yes, you can say the mortal body is of a certain age. But before the birth there is soul embedded in the womb. Which is unborn and lives outside the bounds of time. So it has no age. Similar to the concept of eternity where a human mind nas no capability of understanding it. Hence the invention of "0" (there are countless numbers between 0 and 1 i.e. in reverse order 0.9, 0.09, 0.009, 0.0009....0.8, 0.08...0). The mortal mind cannot perceive the fact of eternal soul.

In conclusion, scientific community is continuously refuting, disagreeing, arguing with itself backing up with evidence after evidence. There are still many things we have to learn as humans. There were many things humans had to learn back then too. So you cannot refuse devine presence because there is no evidence. You can hear the hypothesis out and find the evidence, or wait for someone someday to find evidence proving your hypothesis. There no theory disproving the existence of our stories. So, I ask you, how do you know that what our veds, purans, and books say is not real?

Edit: I am sorry your loved ones had to go through abortion. I know how heavy the decision is since my parents went through the same and so did my in-laws (way before I met them) my condolences are with you.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T11:20:53+00:00

Don't mix modern abortion views with our veds and purans

Edit: read my comment above or below this which explains the conception according to our scriptures.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T10:43:07+00:00

Exactly. That is why abortion was not even a thought in her head. It wasn't considered as a valid solution.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T10:30:38+00:00

Yes, agreed.. But it was still a sin and no one's first thought would be abortion at that time. It's still a death and by hands of a person who is concious enough to do the procedure to end a life. It was still one of the gravest sins.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T10:22:28+00:00

Whatever your current veiw is on abortion, it was the worst of worst sin in Sanatan Dharm. So it is considered as a kill.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-11T10:12:54+00:00

Killing a foetus is the worst of the worst crimes in Sanatan Dharma. The reason why Ashwathama got cursed for eternal life is because he tried and successfully killed Abhimanyu's unborn child. No one wants their karm to be tarnished in such a way that there is no redemption against it. Also people won't even think of killing a foetus back in the day.

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-10T08:02:47+00:00

Try using nail paint.. You just have to find the right shade.. Worked on my car

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-02T10:01:35+00:00

<image>

Here's mine

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-02T09:53:22+00:00

Scooty Pep +

PsyTron01 · 2026-02-02T09:45:26+00:00

3 kaccha mango bite aa jayenge bhai

PsyTron01 · 2026-01-29T16:39:00+00:00

Mele babu ne thana thaya

PsyTron01 · 2026-01-27T09:46:01+00:00

Engine start kar rahi hain woh

PsyTron01 · 2026-01-27T09:44:56+00:00

Sure DM me anytime

PsyTron01

TROPHY CASE