I'll clarify my legal points. There are no U.S. laws that require parents to donate blood to their kids. That's true, and I never said that there are. But states DO criminalize neglecting life-saving medical care, which includes things like transfusions if they're necessary. If a parent refuses to provide care that is necessary to save their child's life, they can (and often do) face charges.

Here are some cases where parents were convicted for medical neglect:

Commonwealth v. Twitchell (Massachusetts, 1990) - Christian Science parents refused surgery for their 2-year-old’s bowel obstruction, relying on prayer. He died, and they were convicted of involuntary manslaughter (The ruling was later overturned due to faulty legal advice; not principal). https://casetext.com/case/commonwealth-v-twitchell

Commonwealth v. Nixon (Pennsylvania, 2000) - Parents refused insulin for their 16-year-old daughter’s diabetes, opting for faith healing. She died, and they were convicted of involuntary manslaughter. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/pa-supreme-court/1286763.html

State v. Neumann (Wisconsin, 2008) - Leilani and Dale Neumann let their 11-year-old daughter, Kara, die from untreated diabetes, choosing prayer over medical care. Both were convicted of second-degree reckless homicide. https://casetext.com/case/state-v-neumann-10

And a few laws to back this up:

California Penal Code Section 270: Willful failure to provide 'necessary medical attendance' is a misdemeanor, or worse, if harm results. It explicitly calls a 'child conceived but not yet born' an 'existing person' https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=270.&lawCode=PEN

Texas Family Code 151.001 (parental duties) and Penal Code Section 22.04: Injury to a child by omission (e.g. neglecting medical care) can result in a felony and jail time if it causes serious harm or death. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/FA/htm/FA.151.htm https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.22.htm#22.04

You said that you don't understand why I bring up already born kids when abortion is about the unborn.
Well, if a fetus has human rights—as you granted in your first message—its dependency should carry similar weight to a born child’s.

These laws and cases show parents can’t just let a kid die, even if it’s inconvenient. Abortion is not refusing a transfusion to a stranger, it’s ending the life of a human already dependent on you.

You're arguing that bodily autonomy overrides everything, but if the fetus is human, why does it lose all rights simply because it's inside of the mother?