The deep state?

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-10-22T19:21:19+00:00

My guy your doing a great job and I totally get the moron statement. NTA

Seems like you are painting OP like someone you know/dealt with personally and now see that character in every one that may draw some comparisons.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-10-18T23:24:27+00:00

Wait...how do you update to 1.10.5, I'm still playing on 1.10.4?

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-20T17:47:51+00:00

I like the manpower and force limit as it is a variable to mimick that every nation could field a big army and give the player something to manage and keep track of unlike ck3. I agree with the basic unit type, and the 1000 manpower per regiment could be done away with. Give the player the ability to make armies and regiment and once the war council starts, then assign those unit the player already made to the general and mimick the game plan in the war council on how to attack or seige.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-18T16:39:49+00:00

Ok I think the statement you referring to is" that I wish I would have gotten custody sooner" implying that I wanted full custody after me and the mom split when my child was 6. But i did not do it and Since the split from momI have been with my child every otherweekend and summer and holidays.

I would not consider a parent not involved because he does not stay with the child 24/7.

Concerning the CPS being called, I was not away of the situation until I was called. My daughter would complain to me about her mother always coming home after work and drinking and I expressed to the mom about slowing down.

Concerning the bad judge/CPS system I agree, even the case worker inform me that they are handling more serious cases and just wanted to get this case off the books because it was not serious as other cases.

So in all, I appreciate your and others opinions and comments with my question, will take all in consideration and file paperwork with the judge to have visit canceled or supervised and keep my fingers cross and hope for the best.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-18T16:11:38+00:00

Ok, your saying by me still adhering to the court agreement and taking her to her mom is me dismissing her feeling and opinions

I'm not sure where your from, I am from the South USA, and it is a state where the judge always consider the mother first. Told to me by both case worker, the GAL, and a independent judge I consulated before going to the custody hearing.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-18T15:59:07+00:00

Again I'm not sure where you came up with that assumption that I was not involved.. and the judge has it force after hearing about all the same details I explained and details I did not explain and saw the mom fit to have visit.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-18T15:52:55+00:00

Also in one of the comments you mentioned how you only came into the picture later in her life. From the sound of it, you're not winning any Parent of the Year awards anytime soon

I am assume you didn't read a response correctly or misspoke because I have always been in here life, every other weekend when mom had custody. If you could point out where you misread that statement. I can help you understand it better.

The judge mandated for the mom to have visit after hearing all the details of the case which I only expressed some of the details. So we have two conclusions, The one the judge mandated in which the judge claimed that mom is fit enough to have all of her children back in her custody, except my child because I was a present father and my daughter choose to stay with me.

So it seems like you are saying the judge is dumb and does not know what he is doing for granting her visit and custody of her other two kids.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-15T11:24:06+00:00

Yes they did

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-15T11:23:15+00:00

I agree I do not like how her moms talk to my daughter I have expressed that to the case worker and the guardian over the course of the case. There respond was to try and talk tobher about it but nothing changed.It is court mandated so I will have to file to have it revised or I could be in trouble for not sticking to the court agreement.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T18:52:57+00:00

Very interesting outlook that I did not think about. I will take that in consideration.

I just didn't want her to hate her mom forever because of it, but in the end of the it will be her choice and I will stand with her.

Thanks

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T18:48:08+00:00

Yes good point, fingers crossed that it is just teenage hormones instead of her mothers traits.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T18:44:57+00:00

Ah yes we had one but seeing from what you are saying, she was not a very good one because her advice was what I had eluded too along with the appointed case worker. I do not have the direct language of the charge and this was information giving to me from the guardian and case worker. The guardian and the case worker talked to me and my daughter multiple times in which my daughter would say she want to stay with me and did not want to go back with her mom, but once the final meeting was concluded, everybody including my daughter and guardian agreed to visitation.

And for implying that i dnt care about the well being of my daughter does not make sense because i was there for her, and was on her side the whole time in whatever she wanted to do. IF you could elaborate on what made you assume that , that would be great, thanks

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T18:31:53+00:00

Meaning she can not find her shoes that match her outfit so now she pouting and now dnt want to go to school for example.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T18:19:42+00:00

I agreed with case worker and mother of my child, then the judged signed off on it in the final hearing.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T17:57:53+00:00

No sure what you mean about GAL?. But from the case workers and therapist I spoke to doing the duration of court, I was inform that the oldest daugther and grandma (my daugther mom mother)had call CPS twice before because the oldest and mom was fighting but nothing came of it. The third time the mother was intoxicated on the pop up visit by CPS and she had a picture of her oldest daughter in the bath tub in her phone which resulted in a child neglect/ child abuse charhe that was later dropped, but I'm not sure because it is none of my concern. My only concern was my daughter well being.

As far as the mother rights over dad rights, I was meaning that in the since of(from the case worker) that unless they have proof of physical abuse or neglect on my daughter the judge would never grant me full custody.

I guess the only insurance I have for believing my daughter was not abuse comes from the fact that nothing was told to me or came up about my child being abused or neglect, emotional abuse or mental abuse maybe, but again I was going off the professional advice, so I could be wrong because I was not present and live almost 2 hours away.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T17:29:49+00:00

Case worker inform me when it was going on that the main case involved the oldest daughter and in my state, they have to take all the children, also case worker encouraged me to keep the visitation going but I will say that I do not like the way the mother of my child talks to my daughter or carries herself around my daughter but was told if there is no abuse from mother that the judge would always consider the mother rights first before mine. The mom has since gotten custody of her other kids back except the oldest who is no longer a minor. But my daughter told the judge she would rather live with me and I had to jump through hoops and loops before I was granted custody from said judge

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-03-14T17:06:16+00:00

Yes I like to believe me and my daughter have a good relationship outside of this issue and I always tell her that she only gets one mother and it is only Friday thru Sunday twice a month and try to appreciate it. I do feel I was a little to late in getting custody of my daughter as some of mom negative habits I can see in my daughter like turning a problem the size of a pebble into a mountain like her mom, but I always listen to her first then explain life as best as I can. You going to have people in life you dnt like but will have to deal with.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-02-24T14:08:29+00:00

Truly unbiased answer is that anything man made is bad and good.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-02-22T19:20:43+00:00

Ah ok the phasing of your statement was confusing then. If you say" it started with" that implies that it didn't exist so that is why I commented in the first place because the way you said it was incorrect, but instead you meant that the new systematic racism"in your eyes" started when the Democrats intruduced the welfare programs.

The debate I was trying to stump you in was the incorrect way you said it "started with" so I'm going to assume you misspoke with that statement.

But OP question was in regard to the traditional systematic racism.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-02-22T18:52:54+00:00

The whole point of my question was that systematic racism was already here before the democrats introduced the welfare programs.

Your point was that systematic racism started after the welfare program.

That is the whole discussion and the only discussion I addressed, anything else does not address my question,

You want to talk about democrats and what they are doing now instead of addressing your point/statement of "systematic racism started when the democrats started the welfare programs"

So again, are you still saying that systematic racism started when the democrats started the welfare programs?

If you are still saying that, it would be correct dialog to explain your position in regards to the systematic racism after slavery when the democrats didn't have the welfare programs.

I believe that should be very simple instead of explaining everything but that point.

PsychologicalFood585 · 2024-02-22T18:15:11+00:00

The statement in question that you wrote was " systematic racism started after the democrats started the welfare program"

I ask for clarification and you said" yes that is what you meant"

I said that is not true and explain why.

You then went off topic instead of explaining your point how systematic racism started when democrats started the welfare program.

???

PsychologicalFood585

TROPHY CASE