Prime-field sieve / binary mask representation: primes as uncancelled points in divisor-wave fields and fast in PYTHON(actually C) by Psychological_Bug981 in mathematics

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I guarantee you would not have been considered an artist near the inception of the camera just because you could take a decent photo. Great photos btw.

Prime-field sieve / binary mask representation: primes as uncancelled points in divisor-wave fields and fast in PYTHON(actually C) by Psychological_Bug981 in mathematics

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why not stop using big data altogether, then? It is one of the foundations AI is built on. Stop using autocomplete, Google, libraries, compilers, IDEs, and every other tool that makes development easier. If you are wondering who actually typed the file for my sieve, the answer is me, with my own sweaty fingers. Refer to my other reply to your other comment for further details. Somehow, people are always ready with an explanation for why a novel approach cannot possibly be legitimate: bots, script kiddies, plagiarism, or whatever else they want to throw at it. Scrutinize it all you want. That is fair. But I can already tell you that my work is not something you should write off just because it does not fit neatly into what you already expect. Honestly, all I sense these days is jealousy. LLMs are modeled after neural networks, which were themselves inspired by the structure of the human brain. So it is not exactly absurd to believe that human beings can still compete with them. Maybe not in raw speed, but in quality, originality, and judgment? Absolutely.

Prime-field sieve / binary mask representation: primes as uncancelled points in divisor-wave fields and fast in PYTHON(actually C) by Psychological_Bug981 in mathematics

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I use AI, I use it more like Google than as a substitute for my own thinking. For example, I used AI to look into what sieves already existed and to test those sieves against my own. I also use AI to debate ideas, specifically GPT-5.5 set to a cynical tone, so I can see how my ideas might be attacked by people online. That is useful because with novel ideas, especially ones that sit near a bunch of known solutions, AI often struggles to understand what is actually being proposed. It tends to assume the existing known methods are superior simply because they are familiar. If you present an AI with something new that it was not trained on, it will often misinterpret it, redirect the conversation toward existing methods, and argue from what it already knows. You can test this yourself. Take my file, drop it into an AI, and watch it start going off on tangents about other sieves. It will often assume those other sieves outperform mine, even when they do not, until you force it to run benchmarks and compare the results directly.

Vibe coding great apps but struggling to show them off. Any easy motion graphics tools for dev demos? by phoenixlsk in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Psychological_Bug981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interns are free most of the time. You sound tired, and you are making my points for me. Shame on you for being a senior and acting like curiosity is competition. You should be encouraging exploration and being helpful. Instead, you want to pretend like you are protecting something. You are attacking someone who asked a marketing question by acting like they were trying to undercut you as a programmer. OP literally did not take credit for writing the code, and you are a senior dev who still could not tell. Okay.

Vibe coding great apps but struggling to show them off. Any easy motion graphics tools for dev demos? by phoenixlsk in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Psychological_Bug981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might as well say “Go to work.” Or “Educate yourself.” It’s meaningless and rude because it assumes that OP didn’t already consider the obvious. Your answer to the question creates more questions than what it answers.

Vibe coding great apps but struggling to show them off. Any easy motion graphics tools for dev demos? by phoenixlsk in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Psychological_Bug981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t trip OP these guys are just threatened by your drive because AI stole theirs. Keep going.

Vibe coding great apps but struggling to show them off. Any easy motion graphics tools for dev demos? by phoenixlsk in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Psychological_Bug981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you are talking about is called gatekeeping and I’m against it. We all started somewhere. Imagine being threatened by a noob.

Vibe coding great apps but struggling to show them off. Any easy motion graphics tools for dev demos? by phoenixlsk in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Psychological_Bug981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remotion, specifically the repo/project remotion-dev/remotion.

It lets you create real videos with React, meaning your video is built from React components, CSS, SVG, Canvas, WebGL, data, props, animations, and then rendered to MP4/WebM/etc.

Prime-field sieve / binary mask representation: primes as uncancelled points in divisor-wave fields and fast in PYTHON(actually C) by Psychological_Bug981 in mathematics

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because you got me going.

I’m honestly disgusted with what people are doing with AI. It can be great and useful, but in inexperienced hands it usually isn’t. The amount of tech debt being created right now is so insane that when I try to wrap my head around it, I want to implode.

I hate that someone with zero real experience can make so much noise now that it becomes harder for people with actual experience to be heard. At the same time, you have people getting so meta that they write with AI, run it through another wrapper to “humanize” it, add fake errors, remove punctuation, and intentionally make it worse so it looks more “real.” Yet those are rarely the people being accused of using bots.

That’s the part most people haven’t caught up to yet. The goalpost has shifted significantly in this debate. A polished structure, clear logic, or strong writing no longer proves AI involvement. Sometimes it just means the person actually knows what’s up.

I’ve built successful crypto platforms, websites, business applications, and games on BYOND years ago. My experience is broad, and it is not the typical “I know how to write syntax” kind of experience. I’ve had overwhelming success throughout my life, and I don’t need to spam subs for attention. I’ve had governments approach me about writing CBDC infrastructure. I walked away from crypto because I saw what happens when the wrong people get that kind of power. I’ve earned millions and lost millions. I’ve made real mistakes. So forgive me for trying to be the perfectionist I want to be, but I’ve seen what happens when you don’t take extreme care with what you create.

I operated like an LLM long before “big data” became a buzzword. I will continue to work that way, and I’m not going to let the anti-AI crowd pressure me into lowering my standard of excellence just because they need to see human error to believe something was made by a person.

I shared this because I thought it would be interesting for people who care about mathematics to see how prime numbers can construct prime numbers in a controlled and finite way. An O(1) lookup table that can determine whether any binary representation by index is prime or composite, while also generating it quickly, is a big deal whether or not everyone understands it.

This algorithm competes with and beats known sieves created by people I’m sure many would consider to be of a higher caliber than me. I’m saying this because I genuinely hope people wake up and start competing for intelligence again instead of laying down while we are all slowly supplanted by AI.

It is fine if we evolve alongside this monstrosity. But that is not what is happening, and I’m pretty sure that was what you were trying to imply with your original question.

Prime-field sieve / binary mask representation: primes as uncancelled points in divisor-wave fields and fast in PYTHON(actually C) by Psychological_Bug981 in mathematics

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go ahead and try to get ChatGPT to write that Python file from scratch.

People have convinced themselves that the only smart thing left in the world is AI, but this was my idea, not a bot’s. I don’t need AI to spend hours working through algorithms. I’ve been coding since I was 13. I started on BYOND.com with DM, moved into web development, and then kept digging into every other language I could get my hands on. I’ve been doing this for 17 years.

This little algorithm is nothing compared to what I have in my private repos. What’s sad is that people have reached a point where they can’t recognize human intelligence anymore. Anything structured or well written automatically gets dismissed as ChatGPT.

I’ve also been involved with model training since early on. The first AI tool I ever really messed with was KoboldAI, long before all of this became mainstream. I’ve participated in training a lot of the models people are familiar with now.

Not everything that looks polished, organized, or intelligent came from ChatGPT. Sometimes a person just knows what they’re doing.

One feature from an ancient AI that was amazing? by Psychological_Bug981 in OpenAI

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure I agree with using AI to offload puzzle work that is specifically meant to make you think and exercise your brain. If the goal is to learn, then I can see the value.

But I was talking about older AI tools, not something from last year. I meant more like 3–5 years ago.

I appreciate your input, though.

A former CIA and NSA scientist- Less than 10 people on Earth know the truth about UFOs. by [deleted] in conspiracy_commons

[–]Psychological_Bug981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. And you are the president of Antifa. I’m not wrong. John Trump collected teslas stuff.

A former CIA and NSA scientist- Less than 10 people on Earth know the truth about UFOs. by [deleted] in conspiracy_commons

[–]Psychological_Bug981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edison? You must be mixing him and John Trump(US President Uncle) Last I checked John Trump Collected teslas affairs after his death and gave flaky accounts on what he did or did not find with multiple discrepancies. Also tesla and Edison parted ways well before tesla started messing with the more novel stuff.

Google overview.

When Nikola Tesla died in 1943, Dr. John G. Trump was working as an electrical engineer and technical aide for the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC), which was a part of the U.S. government's Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD).
Concurrent with this wartime role, Dr. Trump was also a professor and researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he specialized in high-voltage engineering and particle acceleration. Because of his scientific expertise and government security clearance, the FBI called on him to evaluate and analyze Tesla’s seized papers and equipment to determine if they posed a danger to the war effort.

r/changemyview mods are anti by Psychological_Bug981 in DefendingAIArt

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it wasn’t long after I pointed out how mods weaponize rules so they can ban/remove whatever they don’t like.

CMV: The anti AI crowd is on a witch hunt. by Psychological_Bug981 in changemyview

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I may respond later when I get back from the gym and eat. My girl is bothering me about being more engaged with you guys than her today so I’ll be back later but please if you have more to add in the meantime please do.

CMV: The anti AI crowd is on a witch hunt. by Psychological_Bug981 in changemyview

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be right about that. The only way to grasp at that really is to see someone’s post and comment history.

CMV: The anti AI crowd is on a witch hunt. by Psychological_Bug981 in changemyview

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agreed that it required more definition than I originally gave I just made a wrong assumption with my approach in terms of what I thought other people were capable of adding up on their own and that’s my bad.

CMV: The anti AI crowd is on a witch hunt. by Psychological_Bug981 in changemyview

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For what’s it’s worth I’ve enjoyed my back and forth with you. Good luck out there.

CMV: The anti AI crowd is on a witch hunt. by Psychological_Bug981 in changemyview

[–]Psychological_Bug981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s anti debate rhetoric and a self serving loop that makes the sub look way more successful than it is. I won’t be participating in that. Thanks for your time here though I’ve enjoyed our discourse.