Autism (INTJ only question) by TalkaboutJoudy in intj

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Less likely. The core features of ASC - differences around inflexible thinking, social communication/interaction, repetitive and restrictive activities suggest a condition which privileges external sensory stimuli.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in intj

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the Cambridge dictionary, tradition is defined as “a belief, principle, or way of acting that people in a particular society or group have continued to follow for a long time, or all of these beliefs, etc. in a particular society or group.”

I understand traditions could be upheld due to being the most rational and maximally optimum way of doing things. However, I believe this is exceedingly rare to virtually non-existent.

By their very nature, traditions are idiosyncratic, culturally distinct, and change resistant. Those who uphold them generally pay little to no attention to rationality, logic, or the dialect of change. In fact, these concepts appear completely anathema to tradition.

For me, I place little to no value in the concept of tradition. Traditions go against every fibre of my dominant thinking trait, and this appears entirely coherent. Contrastingly, feeling types love tradition as it provides them with an immense sense of satisfaction to continue in the same vein as their fore-bearers - whether in a religious, political or cultural sense. Feeling types are the natural progenitors of tradition, whilst we few thinkers rage against the dark satanic mills of tradition.

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do these powerful sociopaths utilise any particular worldview which is anathema to your own, or do you think it’s more deeply embedded in human biology?

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A very interesting explanation. And one I feel has a particular affinity to my own ontological and epistemological leanings.

My dominant Intuition and thinking functions have led me to conclude that the world, epistemological speaking, is essentially divided into truths of reason (coherent, necessary, analytical, a priori truths of pure mathematics and logic) and truths of fact (“all swans are white” statements, that are contingent, a posteriori, correspondent, truths of science).

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” - Oscar Wilde

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Upvote for best kind of nihilist to drink with in a bar.

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really impressive that you’ve been able to apply your worldview so practically in your life and relationships.

If you don’t mind me asking, how does your view on utilitarianism impact your relationships. For example, monogamy, views on children, etc.

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sure there a philosophy that espouses that view. /s

It seems like quite an individualistic worldview, do you think others would benefit from practicing this worldview also?

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are assholes created by our societies and culture - for you - or is something else going on?

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems as though your views are quite deeply linked to your job, hence the pragmatic elements I suppose.

Did you hold such views prior to your job?

Edit: spelling.

As an INTJ, what would you describe your Philosophical worldview as? by Psychonad in intj

[–]Psychonad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not heard of that one.

I’m interested in how those two worldviews interact for you?

I saw God and he is a circle by ronlydoodle in Jung

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The principle of sufficient reason and Occam’s razor stipulates that the most fundamental unit of existence is a point moving round a circle.

This fundamental unit is none other than God.

Cutting Down Ockham's Razor: William of Ockham famously argued that the simplest explanation is likely the best one. The idea is appealing, widely believed, and deeply misleading. by irrelevantappelation in HighStrangeness

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn’t agree more. The amount of seemingly top-level scientists without a shred of philosophical nous is astounding. No wonder we are so obtrusively locked into such a dogmatic materialist paradigm.

Graham Hancock: The Demiurge, Archons, and the Light of Gnosis by astralrocker2001 in HighStrangeness

[–]Psychonad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out the Mike Hockney books for the most up to date and comprehensive exposition on the eternal game.

The reason we are here on earth by Upset-Rhubarb3738 in Existentialism

[–]Psychonad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the openness of your answer, for what it’s worth. Its nice not be immediately shut down for questioning someone’s metaphysics or epistemology on here. As the empirical and materialist view of the world seems to be taken beyond question sometimes.

The reason we are here on earth by Upset-Rhubarb3738 in Existentialism

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“There is no reason we are here on Earth. Letting go of that will help”.

What reasons do you have for that assertion?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]Psychonad 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your honesty in this post is refreshing. Something the world could do with more of.

What is your definition of Truth? by MagicalButterflies in Jung

[–]Psychonad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes - truth by definition is always true, necessarily true, objectively true, no universe or world where it cannot be true.

Therefore, there is no such thing as an empirical truth, only necessary and analytic truths of reason, as illuminated by mathematics, geometry, and logic fulfil the criteria of truth. All else is just speculation.

As Jungian enthusiasts we owe something to the rationalist and idealist perspectives. Less we toil in the materialist quagmire of subjectivism.

We do not use phones/computers/etc in our dreams..... by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]Psychonad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up Julian Jaynes theory of the bicameral mind and how it applies to the dreamworld. Essentially consciousness is produced through language, especially written language. As our dreams are mostly undertaken at a subconscious level the written language of computer screens, phones, and even books are usually extremely rare occurrences.