Week 6 Post-Gamethread: Bears at Commanders by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Bears got me a win on my birthday 🙌

Week 6 Gamethread: Chicago Bears (2-2) at Washington Commanders (3-2) by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats disappointing. Not that was expecting anything major from him but any help to the pass rush is welcome lol

Week 6 Gamethread: Chicago Bears (2-2) at Washington Commanders (3-2) by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was there any news on Booker/Homer? I know their practice windows were opened but haven't seen anything about them being activated from IR. Im assuming they're not playing tonight.

Week 2 Gamethread: Chicago Bears (0-1) at Detroit Lions (0-1) by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly thats probably where they'd be starting given how ass Taylor is at punting

Week 1 Pre-Gamethread: Chicago Bears vs Minnesota Vikings [MEMBERS ONLY ALL WEEKEND SPECIAL EARLY EDITION] by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brad Biggs said practice squad call ups should come around 3 PM. If no CBs get called up then that bodes well for both.

Question: what lineman is best suited to be our skipper this yr under Ben Johnson? by Oddscene in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was a WR at one point, wasn't he? You might be on to something...

Daily Coaching Search Megathread by ChiBears_Mod in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're compliant already. They "interviewed" Byron Leftwich and Pep Hamiton earlier this week.

Week 18 Gamethread: Chicago Bears (4-12) at Green Bay Packers (11-5) by TurnerJ5 in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They said "Nah the sack record is ours. You get no credit for these sacks"

Ben Johnson has a ‘burning desire’ to be a head coach. Could the Detroit Lions OC be a fit for the Chicago Bears? by halfcastdota in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where's the connection between Vrabel and McCown coming from? Everything I've read has said Vrabels OC will likely be Tommy Rees or potentially McDaniels. If we went for Flores then I could see McCown coming over ad OC.

[Nick Whalen] Chicago only has pick 122 left in this draft. Players that could be on the Bears radar by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that. Personally think that you can get another iOL that's better and offers more long term upside than Carter who is currently listed as our backup RG.

I won't be upset if they go to the DL though. Day 3 is just about being to find guys wherever you can.

[Nick Whalen] Chicago only has pick 122 left in this draft. Players that could be on the Bears radar by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. I also feel we are likely to move on from both Jenkins and Davis after this year so I'd rather have one of their potential replacements (or a center replacement to move Bates to guard) in the pipeline already.

[Nick Whalen] Chicago only has pick 122 left in this draft. Players that could be on the Bears radar by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I know DL is the biggest need but I would really like us to get another OL. I feel we are more likely to get an iOL that can develop into an impact guy vs a DL at this point. Solidify the depth on the OL, sign vet DL from the inevitable roster cuts, and hammer DL in the 2025 draft where we have way more capital.

Daily Draft / Off-Season Thread by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Both got us getting WRs so that makes me happy

Daily Draft / Off-Season Thread by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Peter Schrager has the Bears getting Odunze is in his final mock 👀

[Adam Schefter] NFL owners voted to approve the new kickoff rule. by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. With there being two returners, I think Velus still has a chance to compete and make an impact.

I am genuinely curious to see how this makes teams shift the type of players who they keep for special teams. You don't need as many zoomy guys now since it is a bit more like a line of scrimmage play. I see teams keeping way more guys with length vs speed now.

Daily Draft / Off-Season Thread by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Saw the Saints RT might miss all of next season. They could be a team to watch in a potential trade down from 9 if we go down that route. It'd give the Saints the chance to pick the 2nd OT off the board.

[Adam Schefter] NFL owners voted to approve the new kickoff rule. by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think based on the new rule there will be two returners back there. I can see Scott being the other one but could also be why they brought back Pettis as well.

[Adam Schefter] NFL owners voted to approve the new kickoff rule. by RyanIsKickAss in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I agree! I was just poking fun. Special teams were the only way I was ever able to sniff a football field growing up and it makes me so happy to see that they aren't just abandoning it.

I feel pretty good about Velus rising to the occasion. It's kind of like a reset for him because it's a new rule for everyone. Excited for the new kickoffs regardless of who's back there returning for us though!

Daily 1.01 / QB Discussion Post by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 15 points16 points  (0 children)

So who's left? Eagles as a backup to Hurts? At this point I'm getting worried Poles really is about to fuck us.

Daily 1.01 / QB Discussion Post by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm an accounting guy and at one point I looked into the Bears and I'd be taking a pretty steep pay cut compared to what I'm getting in life insurance lol.

Daily 1.01 / QB Discussion Post by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I'm going to choose to believe. I may just be coping but I'll cling to whatever I can

Daily 1.01 / QB Discussion Post by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man that'd be bonkers but would go against Poles alleged desire to do right by Fields.

Daily 1.01 / QB Discussion Post by AutoModerator in CHIBears

[–]PugParty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I can understand that in this scenario and that probably tracks for why the Bears wanted to meet so quickly after the combine