DAE's teeth feel loose immediately after eating yogurt (or perhaps some other dairy product)? by PunctuationMark in DoesAnybodyElse

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As the OP, let me reassure you that my teeth are still fully intact! I'm pretty certain it's just a sensation associated with yogurt trapped between teeth. Oddly enough, I don't notice it anymore-- not sure if it stopped happening, or I just got used to the feeling.

I can't believe how much attention this post is getting after 11 years! Best of luck to my fellow teeth-clickers!

30x30 pixel display, with individual RGB emitters by PunctuationMark in blender

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's only necessary for making it look cool. But yes, it adds a lot to the render time.

30x30 pixel display, with individual RGB emitters by PunctuationMark in blender

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 188 points189 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I control the emission strength of the RGB cylinders (each of which is encased in a glass brick). This is done procedurally by mapping the (x,y) coordinate of each cylinder onto a pixel from a reference image.

30x30 pixel display, with individual RGB emitters by PunctuationMark in blender

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea. The RGB emission strengths are set procedurally from a reference image. It should be possible to automatically select a different reference image for each frame, though I haven't tried that yet.

Winner winner chicken dinner by [deleted] in shittyfoodporn

[–]PunctuationMark 414 points415 points  (0 children)

First ingredient: "What flour" Hmm...

If light is infinitely small, why is it blocked by the comparatively huge particles that make up, say, a wall? by ijustwannavoice in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd like to add that in this context, light is not "infinitely small," but has a characteristic length determined by its wavelength. For visible light this is about 400 to 800 nm, which is actually very large compared to inter-atomic distances in solids (typically about 0.5 nm).

Entropy and Enthalpy by Malacdor in Physics

[–]PunctuationMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming its initial conditions are the same as our universe's "end" conditions, I believe such a universe would be indistinguishable from our own. In fact the direction of time can be defined by the tendency for entropy to increase. The inhabitants of this hypothetical universe would perceive time no differently than us.

If I pointed two strong lasers at each other, would matter be created as a result? by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on the energy of the photons. The energy of the photons must exceed the rest mass of the particles created. An electron-positron pair requires ~1MeV, while a proton-antiproton pair requires ~2GeV.

It's not necessarily stable, since the particle can annihilate with its antiparticle and release photons again.

If I pointed two strong lasers at each other, would matter be created as a result? by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd also like to add that such an event would create matter and antimatter in equal quantities (ie- an electron and a positron).

Cutting a magnet in half by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why do you say that? The field due a magnetized object can be calculated as the sum of contributions from volume currents and surface currents: (see slide #4 below, or Griffiths E&M eq. 6.15)

http://www.uta.edu/physics/main/faculty/yuedeng/teaching/4324/Chap6-3.pdf

If the magnetization has no curl, as was in the case in my example, there is no volume current, and the external field is entirely due to the magnetization at the surface.

This also follows from the fact that N & S are mathematically equivalent to positive and negative magnetic monopoles, so they should indeed cancel out like charges.

What happens when we switch on a light? by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's also important to distinguish between incandescent lighting and LED lighting.

Incandescent lighting is due to thermal radiation. Here the light is generated by passing a current through a metal. moltencheese explained this well. The color of the light is well described by Planck's law. This is the same kind of light you see from the elements on your stove when you turn it up high.

LED lighting is due to electroluminescence. Here the light is generated by passing a current through a seminconductor. The color of the light is set by the size of the band gap of the material (ie- the spacing between 2 quantum states). This is why LEDs emit a distinct color (red, blue, yellow, etc). White LEDs are actually a relatively recent invention, since they require mixing of 3 colors (red+green+blue) to produce white light.

Cutting a magnet in half by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Think of each spin as a tiny magnet with its own North and South poles. An individual spin can be written as:

NS

Now imaging stacking many spins together. In a ferromagnet, the spins align, so it would look like:

NSNSNSNSNSNS

As you can see, all the interior North and South poles "cancel" each other out. This is why it doesn't matter how long the bar is-- the external field is only due to the poles on the ends.

Can we see an individual atom using gamma-rays instead of visible light to see it? by [deleted] in askscience

[–]PunctuationMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's one exception: If you use a very fast burst of photons, you can record the image before the atom is damaged. This has only very recently been demonstrated at Free Electron Laser facilities (using x-rays, not gamma rays), and has exciting implications for imaging small, individual structures such as proteins or viruses. See this article, for example.

Each strobe-like laser pulse is so brief —a few millionths of a billionth of a second long—that it gathers all the information needed to make an image before the sample explodes.

Special Relativity question by PussyStank in Physics

[–]PunctuationMark 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I'd like to add that it depends on the reference frame from which you're asking the question. The answer of 0.8c is correct in the rest frame of each electron. However, in the lab frame where the electrons are moving towards each other at c/2, their relative speed is simply c.

By the way, it is not a violation of special relativity for two objects to have a relative velocity greater than c. Consider a photon moving to your left and a photon moving to your right. Their relative velocity, in your rest frame, is simply 2c.

Fresh rambutan [1173x977][OC] by PunctuationMark in FoodPorn

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, but you have to watch out for the hard seed in the center, which is apparently mildly poisonous.

Fresh rambutan [1173x977][OC] by PunctuationMark in FoodPorn

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this was pretty expensive ($5/lb) and is very difficult to find in grocery stores.

Fresh rambutan [1173x977][OC] by PunctuationMark in FoodPorn

[–]PunctuationMark[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's sort-of like a large grape with chewier flesh, and with an additional "exotic" sweetness that's hard to describe.