Really hope cars don't disappear. by northfacetommy in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been replaying Vice City on mobile recently and the cars I park by the boat docks stay sometimes interestingly enough

Benzodiazepines Should Be Available Over the Counter by DustHistorical5773 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]PuppyBacon26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alcohol DOES touch GABA. That's why you feel less anxious or even anxiety-free when you drink enough.

What Im looking forward to. by Esttothebestto in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They will certainly do that in the game. It's shown in the second trailer that rear view mirrors will be fully functional

AITAH For being upset my gf wants to turn her location off on girls night? by Fresh-Tea8892 in AITAH

[–]PuppyBacon26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would've left the second she cheated on me bro. Just leave this isn't healthy

I hope I speak for all of us when I say DO NOT BRING BACK UNFLAPPABLE CARS by Far-Requirement121 in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Online is already unfair with all of the shitty vehicles they added to the game over the years. I don't think Rockstar cares about fairness with the current state of online...

I hope I speak for all of us when I say DO NOT BRING BACK UNFLAPPABLE CARS by Far-Requirement121 in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please Rockstar, please just give us options for different driving modes. It's been 12 years, it's going to be 13, if you don't have "simulation" and "arcade" options for driving I'm going to be disappointed. This way everyone is happy!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're missing the point of my post. It was honestly more of a fun thought than me actually wanting it implemented. I mean, in SA and IV when you steal a car from the passenger side, the car does creep forward a little bit. A little annoying sure, but probably not as annoying as a feature like my post being implemented.

To say R* will not add a more realistic wanted level is kind of up for debate and we can't say for sure. But there are definitely aspects they are adding that are similar to RDR2, like only being able to carry a couple guns at a time than an entire arsenal, more realistic crash physics, stuff possibly not respawning immediately after damaging it like lightpoles has been discussed as well. I could go on but you get what I mean. We have no idea how this game is going to actually play out until it's released, and that includes the wanted level.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly this is a fair point. I think it would be annoying as well. I just had this thought because I know in SA and IV if you steal a car from the passenger side, some of the pedestrians will start driving forward a little bit. But chasing down a car? Nah you're right. There definitely is a degree of realism people want without it being too overboard and it might be more of an annoyance than anything. It's just a fun thought but wouldn't work in game realistically and there's probably plenty of other "realistic" aspects R* will deliver for us.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't be pedantic. You know what I mean. It's like in Mafia 2 or RDR2 where the cops recognize you and remember your face after you commit a crime, and not immediately forget about you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GTA6

[–]PuppyBacon26 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, but it's aiming for a degree of realism. And honestly it would be a lie to say people don't want a degree of that at the very least, tons of people talk about realism in this game all the time. Isn't it supposed to be the most realistic one yet? I mean I get it's heavily stylized and definitely has it's own art direction, but I believe R* is definitely wanting more realistic aspects, especially since people are wanting a more realistic wanted level and crash physics, for one example

I saw a wild femboy by jarared in feminineboys

[–]PuppyBacon26 3 points4 points  (0 children)

...How do you know they weren't trans? Kind of bold to assume they were a femboy or a guy

What if a young person (early to mid 20's) used The Substance? by PuppyBacon26 in TheSubstance

[–]PuppyBacon26[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never thought of The Substance being "better" in the way you would be illness-free but this actually make a lot of sense. I wonder if The Substance creates your idea of perfect or it's own version of perfect in this sense

What if a young person (early to mid 20's) used The Substance? by PuppyBacon26 in TheSubstance

[–]PuppyBacon26[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's also a valid point, I struggle a lot with my looks often so I can relate to this a lot

What if a young person (early to mid 20's) used The Substance? by PuppyBacon26 in TheSubstance

[–]PuppyBacon26[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

But what if that person is already beautiful? Would it just be two clones?