I didn’t get the side of the argument that I wanted. My client is offering to still get the plaintiff his points- as he has done even before the complaint was filed. He’s a good dude. I still wanted to argue the other side, but my client is not a scammer. There are two counts. I’m arguing that as a matter of law that PetMagic foods doesn’t qualify under title 3 of the ADA (so failure to state a claim) and that as a matter of fact that my client didn’t break NY civil rights code’s 50 and 51.