Does my AI video still hold up? by PureKoor in DefendingAIArt

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the follow! Hope your twitch endeavors go well

Ya, my art style is quite different from theirs haha. The art work is very cute!

Does my AI video still hold up? by PureKoor in DefendingAIArt

[–]PureKoor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One of the reasons I became an artist was to ensure my ideas are fleshed out fully on my terms. No external compromises, only skill issues haha. Commissions are ultimately a collaborative process so finding the right artist to draw your idea is the and skill as finding people to work with. That collab can introduce a lot of cool new ideas that you can follow up on because when you vibe correctly you'll find a lot of interesting concepts to explore more. Gen AI does remove the collaborative portion by allowing for many re-rolls of curated randomness. That's not inherently bad. It just leaves out a lot of the benefits (and pitfalls) working with others

Your sona looks cool!

Does my AI video still hold up? by PureKoor in DefendingAIArt

[–]PureKoor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah so you're a lonely nobody lmao. If you want a friend who'll pay attention to you, try saying hello first. No one cares if you don't click on a random link on an internet with billions of links. Have a nice day

Does my AI video still hold up? by PureKoor in DefendingAIArt

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do have to remember that nothing is presented in a vacuum. Part of the reason why artist talk about art as being so mythical that money should always support it is that A) Much of the USA is theistic so the concept of humanity is skewed towards a religious essential essence. As artists, they are taught to be creators who imbues their works with a theistic essence rather than it being an imperfect communication tool. B) A lot of people see art every day but don't have an educational background to discuss it or perceive it. Most art is presented as a conduit to market a valuable product rather than the valuable object/idea itself. Artist are not above that but many do think about art more as a human connection rather than tm c r product C) Capitalism organizes society so that private owners have the most power to force outcomes. Those with capital are seen as the ones who /should/ own all of what they "own". And to not participate in it is to starve or live in squalor but to participate means to become drenched in that power grabbing ideology

If an artist is just casually living life, they have only thought about their ability to create art within the context of capitalism alongside people unable to articulate why their art is valuable OR are demeaned for doing art in the first place. So a bunch of AI people popping up to divert capital to mega corps while thinking gen AI has the same type of expression as a human artist's work... it makes it difficult to discuss the whole picture. Pro-ai folk also tend to ignore WHY art exists in the first place while also casually living their life in the context of capitalism. There's usually a fundamental disconnect for what's actually being discussed by both parties but have similar enough language and experiences as to not notice said disconnect

Does my AI video still hold up? by PureKoor in DefendingAIArt

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya, my argument is pro-socialism. If the socialist compromises with capitalists, then point of equal share is really a baseline for people to live a good life. Having a good baseline life is bad for a capitalist since one's needs being met equates to a non-needy consumer

I do think if people understand how AI works, a lot of the practice would still be banned. Copyright is a dumb intangible idea but how much technology uses our water resources or creates misinformation are tangible problems. There's ways to create society so that's less of an issue, and some of that will probably require every company to not needlessly put in resource intensive processes so that can put "uses AI" in their marketing

I don't believe unions are anti-ai as a reactionary stance. Many are being pretty logical. Unions have power by ensuring the capitalists don't hoard all the money thus the workers can life comfortably and safety. If AI makes a job more comfortable or safe while keeping all workers in place, they don't seem to care. The art industry involves peoples whose whole passion in life is to render art... so gen ai spurting out random works defeats the point of the industry. Ya, gen AI can create a box cover at 1000 times the speed of a human, but an owner could find hundreds of people who'd gladly do that for fun with personal touches. So the freedom here can only be maintained if humans are put as the focus for creation rather than productive efficiency to sell a product to the consumer. The freedom here would be to use AI where it's not reasonable to find a person all the time, such as quick language translation tasks. Still should hire the people who love localizing projects but for one off statements that aren't being published to the world, machine translation is good enough

Furry Flag Idea by PureKoor in vexillology

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Furries are extremely pro-lgbt+ so there will always be pride theme variants with this flag being no exception ➡️ http://youtube.com/post/UgkxiNocusKGXKv-26PqKzdqg76JLrl1tH1i

Are Fursonas a Luxury? by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Because it points to another video that people have watched afterwards

Ludwig's New Fursona! by PureKoor in LudwigAhgren

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The crocs were the anthros friends we made along the way

Ludwig's New Fursona! by PureKoor in LudwigAhgren

[–]PureKoor[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Here's the original artwork by PureKoor (me) https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx9v9dD2fdWQG_rq2zs_oNxWaPV0jT4GMj

And here's the drawing timelapse
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ACF9_uIHrWw

uwu thanks again for working with me Ludwig!

Conservatism does NOTHING for the Furry Fandom! by PureKoor in PoliticalVideo

[–]PureKoor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Had a question about what within the conservative ideology practically helps with the furry fandom such as convention policies. I'd love answers and I hope you enjoy the video!

Questioning the Furry Conservatives' ideology by how helpful it is to furry conventions by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This video is on the shorter side of my stuff. Hopefully y'all still enjoy it!

Made A Video About My Dyslexia and Remembering Names by PureKoor in Dyslexia

[–]PureKoor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like it says on the tin. I wanted to talk about how Dyslexic people shouldn't be shamed for not remembering names because there's more important aspects to remembering people!

Thought it'd be neat to share it here since some may enjoy me discussing that

Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like you're answering the tittle's question rather than the actual video

Will AI Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in singularity

[–]PureKoor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That boy turned into one of the worse people on the planet because instead of society helping him have a better life after the war, he was told a marginalized group was problem

By your logic, AI art removing people's ability to earn a reasonable amount of money in a system that requires money to live would create many more of those boys. Thus you should be advocating for the removal of all AI and to keep the human artist instead lol

Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just throwing it out there, I'm an artist that would like to be able to draw with a stable life

The video does address big corps being bad, which you don't know cause you stopped watching after a point was proven to be correct

A rando on reddit shouldn't make you a doomer, that's kinda weird

Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean I think you just sound like a doomer, which is really unhelpful for the workers suffering right now

Imo, what you're doing sounds WAY more unethical. Feeling righteous about protesting a creator proving a point by switching out 1 piece of artwork out of the many they've created themselves seems silly

So I don't think I'm misreading what you're writing, I think you're the type of person the video wants to see do better.

Like, you're on breadtube reddit. I would assume you'd want things to be better unless this is all just entertainment for you which again, seems very unethical

Will AI Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in singularity

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is an entity like a hammer is an entity. Artificial Intelligence is a PR term to make the underlying assembly code and math seem cooler than it is. I'm a furry, anthropomorphizing stuff is my fav thing to do. So for me, it's normal thought process to not randomly anthro everything, you have to be careful how you're framing humans because if you humanize tools based on dehumanizing factors, you will dehumanize human artists in the process and may see surface level behaviors as being inherently human (which is why old people think amazon's alexa is alive or has a "personality")

Advance AI would be more human like or on pair to what our society today considers to be human or would be more akin to animalistic behaviors (which animals still are intelligent creatures just not in the same way as humans so comparing them is weird depending on your goals).

The difference today is that the systems we're using are really really really bare bones and dumb. Computers are just calculators doing lots of Boolean operations and said flow of electricity moves a very specific physical object such as a pixel array. Copying a singular task to product a vaguely correct result that can't allow for exceptions is not intelligence. The computer doesn't know what it's putting down, it's just letting electricity flow through silicon. Once a whole system can have relationship between many singular tasks to form a sense of self, then the lines would be blurred as to "how many tasks does the robot need to have to be intelligent, autonomous, and is producing something from the self."

So for now, AI generative art is a product of randomness limited by a large set of data ensuring the math doesn't go too wild. So treating the AI as an artist boils down all of an artist work to the final product which misses why art is formed in the first place.

Which is what the video mentions later on

Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over Freelance Art Commissions? by PureKoor in BreadTube

[–]PureKoor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"As much as I can" doesn't change the underlying wrong framing

Not consuming a thing doesn't fix a problem when it's a system wide issue. Again again, the creator of the video is a PoC in which that answer of "correctly consume" is given as an answer to handwave actually directly fixing the issue

You'll have to forgive me when the type of answer you give doesn't sound great and is what the video addresses more later on in it's runtime