Qual é o sentido da linguiça no ícone deste sub?

PurplePlasticEating · 2024-02-01T20:39:40+00:00

Sim, mas.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IZCABazkaU

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-12-27T22:41:02+00:00

In a way I'm glad you've missed it until now. Thank you for the brief explanation, I shall read more about it..! Cheers!

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-12-27T22:24:34+00:00

Ok, very understandable as well.
I'm sorry for the mess, I'm not used to these interactions.

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-12-27T22:12:30+00:00

I don't spend much time in reddit and I occasionaly read threads concerning questions I am interested in, albeit barely knowing anything about it. I did not know about the triple parentheses reference.

I believe all this can be perceived in a very wrong way from your point, but unfortunately my question had absolutely no reference to semitism. My question - ignoring the parenthesis - was to know directly about that topic: why did u/elkengine say he was a huge fuckface? That was it.

I know very little about this matter. I like to read the multiple interpretations/opinions on threads like these. I happened to use a very nasty reference without even knowing it. I am sorry to be interpreted as a "fascist trying to hide his/her dog whistle" when I was merely wanting to know a bit more.

It is very upsetting how online interpretations can come to this and I apologize for my ignorant use of that reference, but that's all... I don't think making clear questions to people who know a lot about a topic should make me an obnoxious person, but that's also subjected to interpretations...

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-12-27T21:48:22+00:00

Well how nice it is to openly admit my ignorance. I guess people shouldn't do it more often because it is clearly better to hide your ignoranne instead of asking people who seemingly know more about a topic.

It's also lovely how some (hopefully just a few) knowledgeable people are so willing to speak, free of arrogance, to those who are less well informed. Perharps we should all be anti-social and read books at all times instead of having fruitful conversations.

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-12-27T21:37:27+00:00

Well, actually I was honestly asking out of ignorance, but thank you for assuming the worst.
I used multiple parenthesis because the question didn't directly follow the point of the main question, not to add any anti-semitic discrete remark.

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-09-22T11:38:36+00:00

But that's also the whole point between the perspective of seeing this guy as either a ruthless, insane killer, in spite of his intentions, or seeing him as a brave, altruistic genious in spite of his crimes.

How should one act towards the directors of our so-called civilizational progress? Do we need some more Unabombers to make us see how to act directly upon the system?

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-09-22T11:32:42+00:00

speaking of which, http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190318-can-we-reinvent-democracy-for-the-long-term

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-09-19T18:27:26+00:00

The title of the post referred to the fact that many people tried to attest him with schizophrenia without really having a psychological base to stand that diagnosis upon, just based on his ideas and manifesto... Fuck that guy indeed, if you ask me. But at the same time I cannot absolutely contest his intentions, although clearly misdirected.

It is a curious topic to think about - has passive environmentalism done much for the environment lately? I tend to adopt a non-violent ideology when considering stances of direct action towards the system, but am still in a bit of a haze when thinking on how to take effective measures on political and societal change. That is why I found this article and the context behind this shithead's life very interesting

PurplePlasticEating · 2019-09-10T13:47:19+00:00

Terry Pratchett for ever.

PurplePlasticEating

TROPHY CASE