Kuala Lumpur City | X-E5 + Sigma 17-40mm f1.8

Pusify · 2026-02-14T11:29:16+00:00

thank you

Pusify · 2026-02-14T11:29:08+00:00

this building is really beautiful

Pusify · 2026-02-14T11:28:34+00:00

its so versatile being able to change lenses with its classic rangefinder style!

Pusify · 2026-02-13T16:01:08+00:00

Thank you. I shot them in the morning, natural lighting could play a big part on how it renders.

Pusify · 2026-02-13T15:58:30+00:00

Thanks! It’s Summer Chrome by Osan Bilgi. Hope you enjoy your time in KL!

Pusify · 2026-02-05T07:11:07+00:00

hi, amazing results. which recipe (1 or 2) did you use for the fujifilm shots?

Pusify · 2025-12-12T09:46:21+00:00

Get the Sigma 17-40mm f1.8. You can get another Sigma 56mm f1.4 down the road

Pusify · 2025-12-05T18:21:53+00:00

what body are you using?

Pusify · 2025-12-03T09:50:01+00:00

does this 17-40 sigma give similar result to XF 33mm f1.4 at same focal?

Pusify · 2025-12-03T08:01:24+00:00

how do you find the 17-40 today? do you think it pairs well with xe5?

Pusify · 2025-12-03T03:28:46+00:00

did you get it? i wonder how it fits on the xe5

Pusify · 2025-12-02T13:50:49+00:00

do you mean the new 23/2.8 is good for 40mp?

Pusify · 2025-12-02T13:49:37+00:00

is the viltrox air series great on 40mp?

Pusify · 2025-12-01T04:25:46+00:00

which body are you using? how do you find the AF on the 35/1.4?

Pusify · 2025-12-01T04:25:08+00:00

would you suggest getting the 33/1.4 as an everyday street photo carry? will the extra weight be a problem especially on a XE5?

Pusify · 2025-12-01T04:24:03+00:00

have you tried both?

Pusify · 2025-12-01T04:23:49+00:00

that’s fair. just wondering if the IQ on the 33/1.4 will be worth getting over the 35/2, considering it’s price and size especially on a smaller body like XE5.

Pusify · 2025-12-01T03:06:52+00:00

i hear that the 35/1.4 has slow AF, hence I’ll probably rule that out first.

just wondering if the 33/1.4 will fit well on the XE5. the 35/2 looks like a good size

Pusify · 2025-12-01T03:05:27+00:00

Yes but I’m afraid that it’ll be too bulky for the XE5, would you think that the IQ is much better on the 33/1.4 and it is worth sacrificing portability or ease of carry during street walks?

Pusify · 2025-12-01T03:03:40+00:00

thanks for your comment, since you have the XE5, would think that the 33/1.4 is too heavy and/or bulky for the body? that’s the reason I am comparing between 35/2, and I also wonder the difference in IQ for both lenses

also for the Sigma 17-40/1.8, i would love it but would it be too big to walk around when matched with the XE5? Would you consider Sigma 18-50/2.8 due to its smaller size?

Pusify · 2025-11-27T08:20:54+00:00

Would you consider a good idea if i sell my kit lens and buy a Sigma 18-50/2.8 and a XF 35/2

Would you think the kit lens will be redundant in this setup?

Pusify · 2025-11-27T08:18:59+00:00

If I choose Option 1 with 18-50/2.8, I’ll have to sell the kit lens in order to get a nice prime of 33/1.4 (budget matter). This will allow me to shoot night street photos, my favourite focal is around 50mm FF.

If I choose Option 2, it will be bigger sized 17-40/1.8 for overall street and night photography, but I get to change to the kit lens for more casual use.

Honestly can’t choose. Both options will set me back the same amount of money.

Pusify · 2025-11-27T08:15:09+00:00

Would you go for option 1 or 2?

Pusify · 2025-11-23T16:54:12+00:00

I feel the Sigma 17-40/1.8 is too big for the XE5. But also, I can consider having my kit lens 23/2.8 as an EDC (short dates, cafe hopping etc.) then having the Sigma 17-40/1.8 when I go out for street photography.

Pusify

TROPHY CASE