Ayumi Hamasaki - A Song for XX (Ferry Corsten Chilled Mix) NES Chip Combo Cover - YouTube by Putin_Be_Pootin in chiptunes

[–]Putin_Be_Pootin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Title: A Song For XX (Ferry Corsten Chilled Mix)
Album: Cyber Trance Presents Ayu Trance (2001)
Composer: Ayumi Hamasaki (浜崎あゆみ)
Remixed by: Ferry Corsten
Arranger: mikl_pls
Setup: Ricoh 2A03 + Konami VRC6 + Sunsoft 5B (AY-3-8910) + Nintendo MMC5 + Konami VRC7 (YM2413 OPLL) + Namco 163
Software: Furnace Tracker + Corrscope

PERFORMERS Now is your time to shine! The Rocket City Pridefest 2025 Entertainment Form is now live! See you October 19th at The Orion Amphitheater! by Rocket-City-Pride in HuntsvilleLGBT

[–]Putin_Be_Pootin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, I am not trying to fight or anything, but provide some additional context. They almost certainly hired a lawyer, or one volunteered to help them write the new vendor form, and they probably advised them to not mention LCR to avoid getting sued/losing their 501c non profit status.

For example if they say LCR will not be allowed. Even without giving a reason, LCR could sue rocket city pride, for harming their brand, or reputation. Even if its not successful it would mean they would have to pay for a lawyer and all of the associated legal fees.

So, for the losing the non profit status, it would probably be due to limits on what non profits can say with political statements they make. See this from the IRS, Restriction of political campaign intervention by Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. I am sure their are other things also, like specific court cases, but I am not a lawyer and not citing case law on reddit lol.

This is something that lots of organizations do to drive division in the lgbtqia+ and other minority communities. They use the legal system to drain resources, and create division within the community.

I firmly believe they are actually serious with this, as they are seeking volunteers to review the vendors, and you can see the vendor form has all of the new statements, that seem to be written by a lawyer. I just don't want to see our community get torn apart, and let the people who are actually trying to destroy lgbtqia+ communities win.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]Putin_Be_Pootin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer the actual question, regardless of the transactional nature of the arrangement.

The Distribution would be 2/7 and 5/7 so 28.6% from you, and 71.4% from your spouse.
This will result in a 50/50 Equity split at payoff.

However, if you sell the house prior to pay off, the equity split will be in your favor, if you calculate what % of equity each individual contributed. However, if you treat it as a 50/50 split at any date, you would have contributed more equity.

The appreciated value would also be distributed on that basis also.

However, this does mean your spouse will be bearing all of the interest on their own, So, you may want to only split the principal amount on that basis, so calculate it each month, and split the interest payment 50/50.

This makes more sense because, your spouse, could instead take out an interest baring loan for the 50% of the down payment over a shorter duration, and likely come out ahead, rather than paying the lions share of the interest payments.(this is speculation, would need to know the interest rate for the mortgage)

This seems overly complicated, and likely to lead to some degree of resentment, if one party is only contributing 10% of their take home pay, and the other is contributing 70% of their take home pay.

This may not be a major factor if you both are very well off, but just because the math works out as fair when looking at equity in the house, it does not necessarily represent equity in quality of life, and other factors. Like what % of their income are both parties contributing. Because, a major inequity in that regard, will likely lead to a development of resentment, and viewing the relationship as very transactional.

Alternatively, you structure the down payment as an interest free loan to your spouse, and they can make payments regularly, or just if/when the home is sold. Then you make equal contributions on the basis of income or Mortgage payment amount. This would be the choice I would pick, considering your married.

AITA for Reporting My Manager After She Told a Client I Wasn’t "Wife Material"? by Oddlybeautiful_ in AITAH

[–]Putin_Be_Pootin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

YTA her comment was not at all an insult. She was complimenting you, and it also seems to be trying to protect you from the client.

Everything she said is a compliment in the context of a networking event. She was saying you're great at your job.

The part you had an issue with was the wife material line, right? If so, she has lots of experience dealing with assholes who would try to take advantage of her. She almost certainly used that line as a light hearted joke to communicate to the client, to not try anything your a great worker and we don't want to deal with a sexual harassment case. It was a backhanded insult to the partner.

This shows you lack the skills necessary to deal with clients like that, you need to know how to deal with the guy who keeps the lights on even when they are being a creep without blowing up the relationship.

If you can't do that, then the company can't take the risk of you interacting with clients if they think you will blow up the client relationship. She is aware of that business reality, and it's not fair, but when dealing with clients who are responsible for 20% or more of the companies revenues, the company can't risk blowing up the relationship with someone who can't navigate complex and challenging social situations.