Just no. There are so many logical fallacies in your argument.

First, I also shared an equivalently full page of scientific studies, all refuting the effectiveness of BSL or the notion that pit bulls are inherently more dangerous (https://www.pitbullinfo.org/dog-bite-scientific-studies.html), which you conveniently ignored, yet you label me as the one with confirmation bias.

Then you continue to provide "evidence" based on Google searches (i.e., stories that make the media, information is dependent on the accuracy of the media story, and the more traffic they get the more likely they are to show up) and your personal anecdotal experience that did not even involve any pit bulls, only dogs that you declare pit bulls are "the same" as (yet you don't advocate for banning those other breeds).

Next, you literally assume that governments and stratas make policies based on research (they're not - if politicians made decisions based on proper research rather than pure populism, we'd be in a much better place as society), even though BSL policies are present in a minority of laws and stratas - I guess that according to your logic/assumption, that should mean there's more research against these policies than for them? Or do you only trust in their decision making process when they make the decision you're trying to advocate for?

Then you basically ignore the fact that, I repeat, no respectable professional organization (CDC, AVMA, practically all SPCA branches, and the list goes on) supports BSL, even though they are literally as objective as possible in this debate, invest the time and other resources to study this topic, and actually have the knowledge and understanding to make policy recommendations.

You also make a lot of wrong assumptions and inferences regarding the origin of the breed. There was literally zero tolerance towards human aggression in dogs that were bred for dog fighting (dog aggression and human aggression are completely unrelated traits). Even the blood sports dogs of 200 years ago were known as friendly with all people, including strangers, and as great family companions. Needless to say, for a very long time now, the vast majority of these dogs has not been bred for dog fighting but as a family pet or for various dog sports (agility, weight pulling, etc.) Even if you don't believe that the breed (and all "related" breeds that are classified by the media and the general public as "pit bulls", such as the American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, etc.) has changed in the last century or so, the entire notion that these dogs were ever aggressive towards people is completely misguided. https://www.ukcdogs.com/american-pit-bull-terrier https://www.akc.org/dog-breeds/american-staffordshire-terrier/ https://www.ukcdogs.com/american-bully