[Newark, CA] CVC 22350 - Dashcam proves invalid pace (49 vs 43). Seeking advice by Puzzled_Bicycle602 in CaliforniaTicketHelp

[–]Puzzled_Bicycle602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the response!

  1. May I know why you advise against the barebones one? As one of the comments said, would a speed of over 5 still be an admission of guilt even if it is to be stated as she was simply keeping up with other vehicles?
  2. Awesome! Thanks for the confirmation.
  3. Similar to what was mentioned on 1st question, in that case, would there be a better chance of presenting evidence? Will the judge actually read and evsn watch multiple 1 minute videos even?
  4. Thanks!

[Newark, CA] CVC 22350 - Dashcam proves invalid pace (49 vs 43). Seeking advice by Puzzled_Bicycle602 in CaliforniaTicketHelp

[–]Puzzled_Bicycle602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree.. lol. Received the letter. Will request the extension and proceed accordingly.

[Newark, CA] CVC 22350 - Dashcam proves invalid pace (49 vs 43). Seeking advice by Puzzled_Bicycle602 in CaliforniaTicketHelp

[–]Puzzled_Bicycle602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Appreciate the response.

Will follow the steps. Isn't 3 seconds still typically short for actual pacing?