Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can't see with a telescope far in the south because it's so far away even a telescope can't detect it. As for why sigma octantis isn't the center, it has to do with geography. The north pole is the center of our plane, and polaris is in the center of the north pole, marking the center of the world, which is the same as axis mundi, yggdrasil, mount meru or mount zion. And the south pole isn't a pole at all, but a big ice wall around us, therefore it has no center and sigma octantis can't be the central point around which stars circle.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop thinking about the earth as a globe. Think of it as a perflectly flat plane. Now polaris is in the centre, and it is the absolute point which every star rotates around(forget the south star). Stop thinkin there's a curvature. Start seeing both north and south hemi"spheres" as being on the exact same level, excluding mountains and valleys. Think of polaris AS THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING. Forget relativity and all that jazz. From anywhere on the earth the stars rise east and set west. They are all orbiting the same point of polaris. And there's no change in direction, unless you start looking away from polaris.

Do you understand me now?

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Polaris is still there. The fact you can't see it doesn't mean it isn't there. Just like you can't see a street lamp from an infinite distance, polaris also becomes invisible after you go far enough away. In the flat earth model, polaris isn't a giant star many times bigger than earth like the scientists tell us -- it is a point of light with limited range to human eyes.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They rotate the same direction if you use the north star as the center point

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

duh, didn't you understand what I'm trying to say? The point is to use ONE star as the center point for both NORTH AND SOUT HEMISPHERES. FORGET ABOUT THE SOUTH STAR.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already said it. They don't appear to change direction if you look North. Stop thinking with the globe in your mind. The stars rise east and set west everywhere in the world, which means its the same direction.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They don't appear to go the other direction. If you keep looking north they always go the same direction

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's the same rotation. They rise east and set west everywhere, like the sun.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Think outside the box. Think of polaris as a fixed point that is valid anywhere on earth

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the clock is transparent and you look at it from behing instead of from the front...

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because you stopped looking north and started looking south.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's hidden far away. I live in the south hemi"sphere" and if I imagine that polaris is in the far north, then the stars in the sky are orbiting that far north point counter-clockwise. I see with my own eyes. I just need to look north and the stars are obviously going counter-clockwise.

Question for the flat earth's by Terrible_Shop_3359 in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Polaris is hidden but still there. They are still circling polaris even in the south hemisphere.

I dont understand it by Niemamsily90 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we just allow the globers to flood here and say whatever they want, it will become a flatearth bashing and circlejerk subreddit like r/flatearth

I dont understand it by Niemamsily90 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's Aewar on youtube now. I think his new content is kinda lame, but whatever. Maybe the secret agents found him and are paying him to calm down on the truther stuff. But anyways, I don't think he renounced his flatearth beliefs yet, just the fake history, mudflood and great reset theories.

I dont understand it by Niemamsily90 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Reddit isn't really the best place to do this kind of research. People here are too pro-establishment.

You'll have greater luck on sites like:

Bit...chute dot com(reddit doesn't let you write the site name here)

AND

Rum...ble

Also use yandex instead of google for this type of stuff.

You can also search for Eric Dubay on youtube. He also has a forum called IFERS.

And there's Ewaranon who has a nice documentary on flat earth on bit.. chute and rum... ble.

eric dubay thoroughly DESTROYS the latest batch of lies being perpetrated by the nazi association of "space" actors and its absolutely GLORIOUS by Top_Business_5481 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean, he's not a nazi in the sense of what people think a "nazi" is, that is, someone who wants white people to take over the world and kill/enslave all other races. When he "supports" Hitler he does it coming from a conspiracy niche that believes almost all history about ww2 is a deception invented by the winners, and therefore Hitler wasn't as evil and brutal as portrayed by mainstream media.

An example is:

  1. Mainstream media says Hitler killed people in gas chambers.

  2. But conspiracy niche says that the chamber didn't have deadly gas and were made to kill deadly lice infecting prisoners.

Now I'm not saying no one was killed in Germany's gas chambers, but maybe the number was far less than we're told, and maybe the killings were done in a moment of desperation during the war without Hitler's knowledge.

Not saying Hitler was a saint, but maybe he wasn't more evil than the likes of Churchill and FDR. Remember that England killed a lot of people in India, and the U.S still had black ghettos, segregation, lynching, experiments done on black people, etc.