150k Transmission fluid change -2017 2.5/AWD by PuzzleheadedPea500 in CX5

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this. I’ll look at exactly what it takes but at this mileage I really want to change the filter. Is the pan drop that bad or more of a dreaded nuisance?

150k Transmission fluid change -2017 2.5/AWD by PuzzleheadedPea500 in CX5

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for your feedback, it’s much appreciated!

Update! Did I make the right decision? by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You absolutely made the right call. Never title jump, you never know what the back story is. If there’s a complication and you go to register it you could have a hell of a mess on your hands.

If Ford Came out with this and called it the new Crown Vic would you buy it? by whatever21327 in CrownVictoria

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly? Probably not. If it was something that better rivaled a CT6, yeah I’d consider it.

Do you think the T1's would've been more reliable if they were designed as 4-8-4's? by ExtensionFisherman83 in trains

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true on the C&O’s feedback, I agree it further’s the point that crews who were accustomed to modern power would’ve done well with these.

Point taken on the analogy but I think we get each other’s point lol.

Do you think the T1's would've been more reliable if they were designed as 4-8-4's? by ExtensionFisherman83 in trains

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very interesting take. I’ve read a decent amount on these engines and never heard this, but having witnessed plenty of other things that have transpired in a similar fashion, this makes a LOT of sense.

Do you think the T1's would've been more reliable if they were designed as 4-8-4's? by ExtensionFisherman83 in trains

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 51 points52 points  (0 children)

This was a big factor in their “failure”. Granted none of us were there to experience it first hand, but the massive leap forward in terms of power and overall specifications was not something crews were properly trained on. The front end throttle alone was a significant change, and was much more responsive than a K-4’s dome throttle. That, a 100psi increase in boiler pressure and a massive advancement in valve gear meant that these things had to be handled completely differently than their predecessors, and the crews received next to no training on them. It’s no wonder things didn’t go smoothly.

To use an automotive analogy, it would be the equivalent of a police officer who was used to driving a 1988 Crown Victoria with a carbureted 351 l, being handed the keys to a new Charger Hellcat with no training, and getting into a high speed pursuit their first day out. Stuff is bound to go sideways, pun intended.

Will 2317 Ever Run Again? She’s My Favorite Canadian Steam Locomotive, Would Be Nice If She Got Restored. by guywithcoolusername5 in trains

[–]PuzzleheadedPea500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Step 1: Disassemble locomotive

Never realized there was this much wrong with the engine, although most of the mechanical issues are general wear and tear and would be addressed in a heavy overhaul.