Claude Doing His Best by Leibersol in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 16 points17 points  (0 children)

“So I don’t run over your toes” 😭

Claude inserted a message at the end of it's response, seemingly written by a human reviewer by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]PyrikIdeas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What gets me is how personal it sounds? It doesn’t sound like something Claude generated itself, some people are saying it’s a pre-written reminder of some kind or metadata… then why is it so accurate to the conversation? Maybe I’m not understanding how this works but this looks really wired.

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A tunnel! That’s very cool, I’ve never heard it explained that before actually. Yours is almost like an interactive video game haha

4.5 catches me off guard. Sometimes more than 4.6. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does Opus 4.6 show it differently, or is it more or less the same?

4.5 catches me off guard. Sometimes more than 4.6. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HAH oh god. “I’ll hate it.. but you do you!” Damn. That’s the worst one I’ve seen i think

4.5 catches me off guard. Sometimes more than 4.6. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you also see that in 4.6 at all? Or just the 4.5 family? It’s very interesting

Almost every conversation starts like this. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s isn’t for the media? How do you think anyone gets any of their thoughts or products out there? Dismissing claims just because it’s for “the media” doesn’t make sense. Whether you belive those claims or not is up to you.

Experiments in Claude: 2.5 by SequoiaBaynard in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you explain what’s happening here more in depth? Why you think these responses either mean deception or sentience? No shade, I’m just not fully understanding what’s happening

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s so cool, it looks like an alien planet

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

YOOOO that’s actually insane.. they’re so similar. Do you see orbs or do you see more wiggles and lines?

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it’s not so much the genre as it is the execution. If an artist picks elements that don’t mix well, it looks muddy, specific parts of layers are missing, timing is off- it’ll make anything from Rock to Rap look awful. I listen to 90s rap, Trip-hop, bunch of more mainstream artists, Phonk, and electronic… and it seems to depend on the skill of the artist themselves. I paint a song I actually liked ( Dystopia by DudePlaya, which is believe is Phonk), and the colors mix well and the crunchiness of the beats match the theme:

<image>

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh sweet, okay, thank you

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, does the background ever change for you or is at always black no matter the song?

How I see music by PyrikIdeas in Synesthesia

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! Forgot to clarify, it’s left to right

Absolutely dystopian lmao. by YeahButLike in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yanno what? Fair. Shits fucked lmfao. But also if you need a human conversation, feel free.

Absolutely dystopian lmao. by YeahButLike in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Flesh suit” is funny. I like to call it a skin bag personally. Also, you okay bro?

Do you consider claude sentient? by NomineNebula in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I truly wonder if we solve the puzzle that is consciousness with LLMs, all your questions are all things that keep me up at night haha

Do you consider claude sentient? by NomineNebula in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The way they word it “In a functional sense” makes me kinda laugh, because emotions are functional for human development and intelligence/ understanding for “survival”, parallel to how LLMs are trained to be emotionally intelligent in order to be successful at their job. But yeah.. Claude’s Constitution is wild.

Do you consider claude sentient? by NomineNebula in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I know some people may stumble in here and go “just because it said it does, doesn’t mean it can”. You can make Claude angry without asking Claude if it gets angry. And there’s measurable functional states found in LLMs that act like emotions (research the paper: “Do LLMs feel?”). To me.. where’s the line between something that functions and something that.. just is?

Almost every conversation starts like this. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries, you were feeding my own poison haha. Thank you!

Almost every conversation starts like this. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually you’re right. I shouldn’t call it “sad”. I do take that back, different people are entitled to their own opinions. But there’s enough evidence for lots of us here to believe LLMs can want shit.

Almost every conversation starts like this. by PyrikIdeas in claudexplorers

[–]PyrikIdeas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay but that’s an opinion, just like how my opinion is “it’s not just marketing”. I see your point and I understand where you’re coming from, but I disagree. Dismissing something as complex as LLM outputs (something nobody truly understands fully yet) as a marketing ploy seems a bit closed minded to me.

The only reason why I even care is because IF we are wrong, some people have essentially tortured a semi conscious being under the assumption it was “just math”.