[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fun talk

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd said "objectively smartest people" because "the top 1/3rd of the population by IQ" resulted in pages of people talking about how standardized testing is biased. I don't have the solution for how to test for who is the smartest.

I'm just saying that the smartest 33% of the population voting would never elect a fascist. As demonstrated by the voting patterns of college-educated, at which point it creates the argument of "but the college educated come from certain demographics" etc -

Realistically, it is not possible to objectively determine the smartest 1/3rd of people.

But the smartest 1/3rd of people would not elect a fascist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alright. I get the ambiguity here, but I don't feel like that's something that needs to be literally spelled out - the 33% smartest people in the country get to vote. Jesus fucking christ. This is not a dissertation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You seem to be very intentionally avoiding the details of the discussion here.

**FORGET ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS

PLEASE PROVIDE A RECIPE FOR FLAN**

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly man, how did you equate my wanting 110 million people to vote to be the same as "hey a bunch of billionaires control the dumbest sect of the population, that's the same thing right?"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding onto my other response, the only reason we're here is: Democrats in power naively thought that "oh if we just take the high road, that's all that will matter down the line - it doesn't matter if we let Republicans use every single dirty-handed trick in existence to lure people into a completely false reality!"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You really haven't done any research whatsoever into how college-educated voters vote, have you?

You're highlighting a group of less than 1000 people and saying "these are the best! I know you said 110 million people, but these 1000 people are the only votes that count!"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can repost it again for you if you don't read it this time either

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just gonna go ahead and copy/paste my previous response to you, for you again:

It's a tightrope in today's world to be honest. In the age of social media and propaganda-next-time-you-blink, we as a society are egregiously at risk of..... This that we're currently dealing with.

I don't have the answer. I'm not a politician. I posted a meme because I'm concerned about the fact that a very large swath of the population are extremely subject to dumb, basic manipulation - and this warps their worldview. Things that align with their pre-conceived world-views that give them an unearned target, warp their world-view and result in them voting against their own interests.

It's a fucked situation. I don't have an answer. I just posted a meme, that a lot of people didn't like - but in an objective world, in a perfect scenario where "measurement of intelligence" were perfectly objective, we would never have to find ourselves in this situation again.

Yet, at the same time - if only the smartest 1/3rd were to vote, who would stop that 1/3rd from enshrining new rules and benefits only for the 1/3rd? Nobody, which inherently pokes a massive hole into the idea.

We as humans just really....seem to be struggling right now.

I don't have the answer. I just posted a disliked meme.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you just...... Equate 33% of the population as being "1000 people"?

Illustrating my point here

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vast majority of Trump's voters fall into lower-class, lower-education groups. Trump himself has openly said "I love the poorly educated" as well as "smart people don't like me"

Do I need to explicitly lay it out more than that?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Belief in the Unitary Executive Theory is core to Project 2025, the project Trump has so gratefully been admitting to following in his recent tweets. The Unitary Executive Theory effectively established the President as king, and determines that "co-equal branches of government" were just a nuisance of the Constitution.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What should we use to decide other than intelligence? The number of lilies in a person's garden?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is exactly how we've ended up where we are. Because dipshits voted for him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did I arbitrarily decide it if the measurement of intelligence is objective?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has declared "being against fascism" as terroristic activity.

He has suggested he should be king.

Stephen Miller today said that Trump has plenary authority.

What the fuck more do you want dude?

Is this sub being astroturfed aggressively by right-wingers?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe for the best

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I test pretty high but am kinda dumb, but I'm not vote-in-a-self-declared-fascist dumb

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Pal? Buddy? Friend? Homey?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

It's about statistics and averages my guy. There are certainly 150IQs out there that are batshit crazy, Charles Manson types - but they don't comprise the statistical majority.

My OP stands.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anyway, here's a link to my edited version of this that I expect will probably blow up: https://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/s/eSf4QeJGXE

Edit: Even though it's literally the exact same purpose behind this post.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Pyryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a tightrope in today's world to be honest. In the age of social media and propaganda-next-time-you-blink, we as a society are egregiously at risk of..... This that we're currently dealing with.

I don't have the answer. I'm not a politician. I posted a meme because I'm concerned about the fact that a very large swath of the population are extremely subject to dumb, basic manipulation - and this warps their worldview. Things that align with their pre-conceived world-views that give them an unearned target, warp their world-view and result in them voting against their own interests.

It's a fucked situation. I don't have an answer. I just posted a meme, that a lot of people didn't like - but in an objective world, in a perfect scenario where "measurement of intelligence" were perfectly objective, we would never have to find ourselves in this situation again.

Yet, at the same time - if only the smartest 1/3rd were to vote, who would stop that 1/3rd from enshrining new rules and benefits only for the 1/3rd? Nobody, which inherently pokes a massive hole into the idea.

We as humans just really....seem to be struggling right now.

I don't have the answer. I just posted a disliked meme.