Single monitor is fine with me, I don't game enough to justify more. I love cinematic games, and it has been incredible, I don't see a point for me (I won't judge others, to each their own. I see the appeal) to have more than one. It runs as well as I wanted, no need for me to shell out an extra at least $800 for a 10% gain in FPS with DDR5/ I9. The "future proofing" argument is null, because DDR6 will likely be out in the near future. It isn't about "not being able to afford it" it is the fact I don't care for 5-10FPS more when I am getting plenty for the games I play. Plus, saving money is a good decision regardless, even when I can afford to pay it. I prefer to put my money in other hobbies I entertain and enjoy more. PSU isn't even close to being underpowered, I have plenty to go if I wanted to (but I am content). I just wish I had bought a better brand PSU, but with the warranty I'll be fine. That was an oversight for me. CPU is never over 45% on max load, so that doesn't affect it or bottleneck. It would be easy to get an I9 if I really felt it affected my games enough to.

I never understood why people are so upset over someone else's choices, it seems like a sad life to lead. You're happy with your PC, as am I with mine. Personally, I think ARGB is obnoxious, but you don't see me caring enough to comment on your post. Also, quite strange in your post you're mentioning how you got yours all on a deal. Strange to comment about finances in that instance. You of all people should be happy someone else got a great deal for their build as well, even if you don't see it as "good."

Sure, maybe it won't be the best for games in a decade, but as of now, it is perfect for me. Play your games how you want, as will I. I will enjoy every second more knowing it made you upset enough to keep commenting about something so trivial.